BBills14 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Hogan would be our #1 or #2 on this team while Gillislee would only be getting better. We should have paid up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Matthews isn't a 1 but Hogan is? Alrighty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Matthews isn't a 1 but Hogan is? Alrighty. Would be our #1 and is a #1 are two different discussions in this case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Really? these are the two guys that put the Bills over the top? You're reading too much Peter King . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianFan Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I don't think a slot is ever WR1. Really? these are the two guys that put the Bills over the top? You're reading too much Peter King . . . Even King wouldn't say that no LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Of all the things to ponder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Tyrod would not be finding Hogan down the field, and Gilislee definitely would not be finding holes Shady can't find Zero change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Silly man. The bills never make mistakes and you are not allowed to question their brilliance. So what if the pats see their value. What have they done that's so desirable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 When Hogan was here we used him as a chain mover, a guy in the slot that could get open and find the soft spots in zone. He wasn't very good at it, not sure handed and frequently not being able to find the 1st down marker. He goes to NE and they used him as a deep threat, it worked for them. Me thinks that we misused him while he was here so it's a moot point to compare team scenarios. Gilleslee could have helped this team against the Panthers, he's very good when Shady was out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 What if we still had Garrison Sanborn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Tuesday Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Interesting, this has never been discussed here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noogie75 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 We will still loose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 We will still loose Staying loose is better than being too tight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) I don't think a slot is ever WR1. Julian Edleman? Jarvis Landry? Edited September 23, 2017 by Sammy Watkins' Rib Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 LOL at this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 We will still loose And not by an arm or a leg, but by a foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 We will still loose a thread like this makes me loose my mind. on another note: "if" is the biggest two letter word in the dictionary. folks need to realize that those players that are gone and those that will be gone this upcoming off season are part of beanes plan in the direction he wants to take/build this team. they, along with the others are not part of the plan. the sooner you understand that the better off you'll be. not understanding that is just a case of denial and constantly complaining about the moves will not change that plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 (edited) Would be our #1 and is a #1 are two different discussions in this caseHogan would never be either so it doesnt matter. And to answer OPs question, we would be in the same spot we are not with both Hogan and MG still on the roster. Lets not be foolish. Edited September 23, 2017 by Bangarang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Hogan would never be either so it doesnt matter. I agree he doesn't deserve to be a #1 If we tendered him better he's also likely still gone now I think week one of 2017 if he were a bill he'd potentially be above the rookie and the late addition that didn't practice much and isn't a real #1 either though. Long term, who knows. And I'm no hogan lover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I agree he doesn't deserve to be a #1 If we tendered him better he's also likely still gone now I think week one of 2017 if he were a bill he'd potentially be above the rookie and the late addition that didn't practice much and isn't a real #1 either though. Long term, who knows. And I'm no hogan lover. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts