uticaclub Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 I know the decision to let Woods walk was under Whaley and Beane traded Watkins. But if it was the same leadership, do both those moves get made?
26CornerBlitz Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) They resigned from both of them. One to free agency and the other traded after declining the 5th year option. Edited September 22, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz
Alphadawg7 Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 Based on what I have seen from Beane, I don't think he would have resigned Woods either.
Big C Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 Based on what I have seen from Beane, I don't think he would have resigned Woods either. Especially not for that price.
Paul Costa Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) Especially not for that price. Agree Edited September 22, 2017 by Paul Costa
PABillsfan23 Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 Pay 8 million a year for a possession type WR? Doesn't seem like this regimes style
Freddie's Dead Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 We resigned them both, so what's the issue?
K D Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 We resigned them both, so what's the issue? I'm going to resign from this thread
Dr.Sack Posted September 22, 2017 Posted September 22, 2017 Yes Woods & Watkins would both be gone. Woods would have cost too much to retain. Watkins was worth a player & a #2.
Recommended Posts