Bills Pimpin' Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 http://nysportsbiz.com/2016/12/07/tyrod-taylors-numbers-withwithout-sammy-watkins-and-robert-woods-are-alarming/He did fine when he had Watkins and Woods healthy. Thats not a good look for Tyrod....
JM2009 Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Thats not a good look for Tyrod.... Good numbers when he has the better players on the field. Not as good with not so good players on the field. what a shock. This WR corp is bad in 2017 with the starters. If Matthews was hurt, holy cow, it would be terrible.
Bills Pimpin' Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 IMO Woods is not a better player than those on the field. Watkins is. Tyrod needs to be better with the guys on his team. The coach is giving him every opportunity to do so. He has a few weeks left.
Buffalo716 Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 I just don't agree with this. You can give him a few more weapons and it won't fix the major issues he has. Can't read a defense, can't throw to the middle of the field, not accurate, doesn't stay in pocket, thinks run first... He's bad. He isn't even average. The league told us all we needed to know about TT when nobody gave him an offer that was worth a crap last offseason but us. Sad! I don't believe TT ever had a chance to be contacted by other teams McBeane
TheFunPolice Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Not really, if it was TT wouldn't be starting after the Denver game. Time will tell. No better option right now.
100DollarBills Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 No better option right now. Doesn't have to be, just give the rookie some experience reps.
Bill_with_it Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Hey look another call out post from you. Cool Its not fair. Just not fair. What is this just not fair sentence you keep saying mean. Literally it pertains to nothing much like what you always post. Not surprising considering the poster.
xRUSHx Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) Over the course of a regular NFL season, Taylor has certainly piled up efficient numbers, but you'd be hard pressed to call them good IMO. No amount of receiving talent is going to change the fact that he's not a good quarterback. I'd also like to add that our OCs had no choice but to design the offense to be Taylor made, whenever it was changed up to be any different Tyrod failed in it. He's a one system QB, Taylor made so he must run his system to even move the chains for a chance to win. Sure there was a some success with his sytem but it proved to be not good enough since the good teams knew how to stop it. Make him be a QB, Tyrod will never have a playoff run, his best seasons are behind him.So...this thread resolved anything yet? Only thing I see is fans done with him and fans making excuses for him so nope same old talk. Edited September 20, 2017 by xRUSHx
QCity Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Its NOT FAIR for Jordan Matthews to have to deal with this in his contract year. Matthews' agent had to be fuming when the trade went down. It's going to knock a few mil off his next deal.
Fixxxer Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 No playoffs for 17 years and this poster is talking about a SB. This roster is far from being a SB roster, no matter who the QB is. great, bring the whole team down to justify the shortcomings of one player.
MAJBobby Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 http://nysportsbiz.com/2016/12/07/tyrod-taylors-numbers-withwithout-sammy-watkins-and-robert-woods-are-alarming/ He did fine when he had Watkins and Woods healthy. Yep fine .500 I don't believe TT ever had a chance to be contacted by other teams McBeane There was no market for him. He knew it. His agent knew it. Thats why he rebooted his prove it deal. What is this just not fair sentence you keep saying mean. Literally it pertains to nothing much like what you always post. Not surprising considering the poster. Sure it does. Everyone talking about TT says Not Fair. So i figure it can be used anytime. It just not fair. Bills set him up. Its a conspiracy to hold down a great QB
xRUSHx Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Question, does anyone think Billacheat would have Tyrod as his starting QB for one year let alone 2half?
kota Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 I was done with him the day he stepped into the building.
Roundybout Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Wait do cant use Not Fair for Matthews, but have to hear over and over how somehow being critical of TT is "Not Fair" It's one thing to be critical, its another to constantly whine and rage against the dude.
row_33 Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Doesn't have to be, just give the rookie some experience reps. can't lose 51-0 week 3 of the season while there is still putative hope Question, does anyone think Billacheat would have Tyrod as his starting QB for one year let alone 2half? He would if that was the only QB in town, he would also teach him how to play in the NFL and make adjustments every series for Tyrod to adapt to the reality of each game
xRUSHx Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) can't lose 51-0 week 3 of the season while there is still putative hope He would if that was the only QB in town, he would also teach him how to play in the NFL and make adjustments every series for Tyrod to adapt to the reality of each game That's funny you think that because it's totally untrue in my opinion . He would have given up on him right away and for sure wouldn't have given him a raise in my opinion. Edited September 20, 2017 by xRUSHx
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 Question, does anyone think Billacheat would have Tyrod as his starting QB for one year let alone 2half? this is a serious question? like you don't already know the answer.
MAJBobby Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 It's one thing to be critical, its another to constantly whine and rage against the dude. I really haven't talked about him in this thread in a long time, instead have raged on certain statements if we want to be truthful
row_33 Posted September 20, 2017 Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) That's funny you think that because it's totally untrue in my opinion . He would have given up on him right away and for sure wouldn't have given him a raise in my opinion. You can't destroy the season and say the hell with it and put in a rookie or scrub without great upside (and he doesn't have it) before the season is proven a total bust. getting keelhauled the next two weeks with Tyrod out there will be proof enough it's a total bust though. Edited September 20, 2017 by row_33
Recommended Posts