ESPN *tried* to take Jemele Hill off the air...and failed.

[Numark3]

I'm sure you can think, but I'm beginning to question how well.

 

If that's a spelling error, or a typo, why not go fix it so you're effectively communicating.

 

Or do you come from an age group that's lazy and blames everyone else for your own errors?

 

edit: there you go. Now that that's behind us, do you have anything else to contribute?

Haha what are you talking about? I have a autocorrect gone wrong and you are saying blablabla about laziness and blames others. Holy smokes batman

 

I think you need to breath?

[TakeYouToTasker]

Haha what are you talking about? I have a autocorrect gone wrong and you are saying blablabla about laziness and blames others. Holy smokes batman

 

I think you need to breath?

Your claim here is that your autocorrect changed "agreeance", which isn't even a word (you're looking for agreement), to "aggreanacsa" which can't even be confused with a word; and you're disowning your introduction of "things people in your age group do" in your failed attempt at being clever?

[GG]

Haha what are you talking about? I have a autocorrect gone wrong and you are saying blablabla about laziness and blames others. Holy smokes batman

 

I think you need to breath?

 

I know. Imagine the hubbub if you had typed covfefe

[DC Tom]

Haha what are you talking about? I have a autocorrect gone wrong and you are saying blablabla about laziness and blames others. Holy smokes batman

 

I think you need to breath?

 

1) Autocorrect doesn't change imaginary words to imaginary words.

2) Autocorrect would change "a autocorrect" to "an autocorrect."

3) Both prove:

a) you're lazy

b) you blame others.

[RaoulDuke79]

 

1) Autocorrect doesn't change imaginary words to imaginary words.

2) Autocorrect would change "a autocorrect" to "an autocorrect."

3) Both prove:

a) you're lazy

b) you blame others.

I hate when autocorrect changes my correct words to other correct words that throw throw the conversation out of context and makes me look like an idiot. I'm not saying I'm and idiot, but I could be perceived as an idiot. Edited September 15, 2017 by RaoulDuke79

[Numark3]

Your claim here is that your autocorrect changed "agreeance", which isn't even a word (you're looking for agreement), to "aggreanacsa" which can't even be confused with a word; and you're disowning your introduction of "things people in your age group do" in your failed attempt at being clever?

Haha I'm having slow Friday afternoon at work so I can do this debate!!! Woohoo

 

agreeance is what I attempted to spell! Which is a word and I'll fight anyone on that. Maybe it's just used more commonly in my profession, but I see it plenty! And google agrees WITH ME!!!!

 

And no, it autocorrected my misspelled agreeance (I had two Gs I think) into something crazy!

 

And I don't think I was being clever, but uh pointing out I can't spell (which I can't). I haven't disowned anything, you made some silly jumps to lazy and something else I can't remeber.

 

1) Autocorrect doesn't change imaginary words to imaginary words.

2) Autocorrect would change "a autocorrect" to "an autocorrect."

3) Both prove:

a) you're lazy

b) you blame others.

Who have I blamed? And where! autocorrect does do that (though not in this situation, but don't let that fact get in the way)

 

I know. Imagine the hubbub if you had typed covfefe

The lamestream libtards would make nothing into something!

 

Man both sides have a lot in common, see e.g. this thread

 

 

 

Some of you need to work on not reading stuff into things that aren't there and work on logical reason, or else you may be called ignorant or something worse

Edited September 15, 2017 by Crayola64

[DC Tom]

Haha I'm having slow Friday afternoon at work so I can do this debate!!! Woohoo

 

agreeance is what I attempted to spell! Which is a word and I'll fight anyone on that. Maybe it's just used more commonly in my profession, but I see it plenty! And google agrees WITH ME!!!!

 

And no, it autocorrected my misspelled agreeance (I had two Gs I think) into something crazy!

 

And I don't think I was being clever, but uh pointing out I can't spell (which I can't). I haven't disowned anything, you made some silly jumps to lazy and something else I can't remeber.

Who have I blamed? And where! autocorrect does do that (though not in this situation, but don't let that fact get in the way)

The lamestream libtards would make nothing into something!

 

Man both sides have a lot in common, see e.g. this thread

 

 

 

Some of you need to work on not reading stuff into things that aren't there and work on logical reason, or else you may be called ignorant or something worse

It's a very cromulent word.

[Numark3]

It's a very cromulent word.

Oh my

[DC Tom]

Oh my

I admire your neologodaciousness.

[Numark3]

I admire your neologodaciousness.

You have me wallowing within myself right now.

[Doc Brown]

I never was into ESPN talk shows anyways. Around The Horn, PTI, First Take, this girls show, etc.... My problem with these shows is they cover so many topics that it's impossible for them to have in depth knowledge on most of the topics they discuss.

 

I don't think Hill should be fired as I never thought ESPN should of fired Schilling, Hank Williams Jr., or even Rush Limbaugh way back in the day. Have them apologize and move on.

[grinreaper]

I never was into ESPN talk shows anyways. Around The Horn, PTI, First Take, this girls show, etc.... My problem with these shows is they cover so many topics that it's impossible for them to have in depth knowledge on most of the topics they discuss.

 

I don't think Hill should be fired as I never thought ESPN should of fired Schilling, Hank Williams Jr., or even Rush Limbaugh way back in the day. Have them apologize and move on.

It's "should have". You are too good of a poster to continually make this mistake.

 

https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-grammar-mistakes-list

 

21) Of vs. Have

I have a bad habit of overusing a phrase that goes like this: "Shoulda, coulda, woulda." That basically means I regret not doing something, but it's too late to dwell on it now. For example, "I shoulda done my laundry on Sunday."

But "shoulda," "coulda," and "woulda" are all short for something else. What's wrong with this statement?

I should of done my laundry on Sunday.

Since it's so common for us to throw around fake worlds like "shoulda," the above mistake is an easy one to make -- "shoulda" sounds like a shortened version of "should of." But really, "shoulda" is short for "should have." See how it works in these sentences:

I should have done my laundry on Sunday.

I could have taken a shorter route.

I would have gone grocery shopping on Friday, if I had time.

So next time, instead of saying, "shoulda, woulda, coulda," I should probably say, "should've, would've, could've."

[Numark3]

It's "should have". You are too good of a poster to continually make this mistake.

 

https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/common-grammar-mistakes-list

21) Of vs. Have

I have a bad habit of overusing a phrase that goes like this: "Shoulda, coulda, woulda." That basically means I regret not doing something, but it's too late to dwell on it now. For example, "I shoulda done my laundry on Sunday."

But "shoulda," "coulda," and "woulda" are all short for something else. What's wrong with this statement?

I should of done my laundry on Sunday.

Since it's so common for us to throw around fake worlds like "shoulda," the above mistake is an easy one to make -- "shoulda" sounds like a shortened version of "should of." But really, "shoulda" is short for "should have." See how it works in these sentences:

I should have done my laundry on Sunday.

I could have taken a shorter route.

I would have gone grocery shopping on Friday, if I had time.

So next time, instead of saying, "shoulda, woulda, coulda," I should probably say, "should've, would've, could've."

Teehee you are a smarty pants

[Koko78]

Your claim here is that your autocorrect changed "agreeance", which isn't even a word (you're looking for agreement), to "aggreanacsa" which can't even be confused with a word; and you're disowning your introduction of "things people in your age group do" in your failed attempt at being clever?

 

So... you're not in aggreanacsa with him?

[KD in CA]

so to avoid inferred racism they have to be racist? seems counterproductive

Welcome to liberalism in America.

[Taro T]

Haha I'm having slow Friday afternoon at work so I can do this debate!!! Woohoo

agreeance is what I attempted to spell! Which is a word and I'll fight anyone on that. Maybe it's just used more commonly in my profession, but I see it plenty! And google agrees WITH ME!!!!

And no, it autocorrected my misspelled agreeance (I had two Gs I think) into something crazy!

And I don't think I was being clever, but uh pointing out I can't spell (which I can't). I haven't disowned anything, you made some silly jumps to lazy and something else I can't remeber.

Who have I blamed? And where! autocorrect does do that (though not in this situation, but don't let that fact get in the way)The lamestream libtards would make nothing into something!

Man both sides have a lot in common, see e.g. this thread

Some of you need to work on not reading stuff into things that aren't there and work on logical reason, or else you may be called ignorant or something worse

Likely true. And the Urban Dictionary claims you're a moron.

[TakeYouToTasker]

Back to the topic at hand, however, it's as wrong now as it was when it happened to Schilling. It shouldn't be illegal, but it should be recognized as a ****ty thing to do.

 

It's the moral equivalent of racism.

Edited September 16, 2017 by TakeYouToTasker

[Just Jack]

 

1) Autocorrect doesn't change imaginary words to imaginary words.

2) Autocorrect would change "a autocorrect" to "an autocorrect."

3) Both prove:

a) you're lazy

b) you blame others.

You haven't seen my phone.

[Numark3]

Likely true. And the Urban Dictionary claims you're a moron.

I can show you 500 judicial opinions with "agreeance" so gtfo . So please don't tell me it's not a word. Supreme Court justices use it, federal court of apppeals, and so forth... it's not an argument you want to have, so don't call me a moron unless you want to have it.

 

Judicial opionions, not urban dictionary child

Edited September 16, 2017 by Crayola64

[DC Tom]

I can show you 500 judicial opinions with "agreeance" so gtfo . So please don't tell me it's not a word. Supreme Court justices use it, federal court of apppeals, and so forth... it's not an argument you want to have, so don't call me a moron unless you want to have it.

 

Judicial opionions, not urban dictionary child

 

But...you are a moron.