SaviorPeterman Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 It was great to take care of business and beat a team that many expect to land the #1 overall pick in next years draft. But the next three weeks will essentially determine this teams fate for the rest of the season. On paper the Bills should lose against the Panthers, Broncos and Falcons which would translate into a 1-3 record. But thankfully the games aren't played on paper. And as of right now I still think the Panthers and Falcons are guaranteed losses by default since they both road games against vastly superior teams and QB's. Denver looked pretty good last night but it was at home and I don't think Simian is anywhere close to the type of QB's Newton and Ryan are. Still thinking 2-2 is best case which would ensure the season isn't lost by Halloween, but if we do lose all 3 then it's time to start thinking about the bills own chances of landing the #1 overall pick next year.
Scott7975 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 I agree with most of what you are saying. I don't view Panthers as an auto loss though. I also think if we beat them people will just turn around and say the Panthers suck. Denver will be tough because of that defense. Atlanta will be tough because of that offense.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 What is so vastly superior about the Panthers? Have you watched Newton over the past 17 games he's played?
Jasovon Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 I think we all know who the Bills are, i'd personally be shocked if we aren't 2-2 or worse. If we get to 3-1 or somehow 4-0 then i'll be sucked in for this season with no looking back.
SaviorPeterman Posted September 12, 2017 Author Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) What is so vastly superior about the Panthers? Have you watched Newton over the past 17 games he's played? They are 2 years removed from one of the most dominating seasons ever that resulted in a SB appearance. That team from 2015 was very 90 Bills like especially how they dominated the NFC playoffs. Yes Newton isn't 100% but he don't need to be with defense the Panthers had and nobody can argue their week 1 performance was much more impressive considering they won by 20 points on the road against a team on the same level of the Jets, if not better than them. We can keep this game close if we go after Newton and he struggles but actually winning is a different story. Edited September 12, 2017 by SaviorPeterman
4_kidd_4 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 Well let's put it this way- we won a game we were "supposed to win". And that's a good sign. Didn't look like world beaters in the process, but we'll def take that "W". That's more of a statement on seasons past, however. How many "should wins" did we drop over the years? A lot. So I would agree, we will definitely have a better feel at the quarter pole of the season.
PromoTheRobot Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 Rule #1: The Bills always suck. If they do win it's because the opponent let them.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 They are 2 years removed from one of the most dominating seasons ever that resulted in a SB appearance. That team from 2015 was very 90 Bills like especially how they dominated the NFC playoffs. Yes Newton isn't 100% but he don't need to be with defense the Panthers had and nobody can argue their week 1 performance was much more impressive considering they won by 20 points on the road against a team on the same level of the Jets, if not better than them. We can keep this game close if we go after Newton and he struggles but actually winning is a different story. And they're one year removed from 6-10 and a terrible offense, production-wise. Look, I'm not saying it's a gimmie for us, but they aren't a vastly superior roster. If anything, they are strikingly similar.
KellyToughII Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 Funny, I thought it would take another couple drafts / Seasons to figure that out.
TigerJ Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 Panthers are not a great team, but Vegas thinks they beat the Bills without much trouble. That means it should be a good test for the Bills as a next step after winning a game they were supposed to win. The Broncos and Falcons are both good teams even if Trevor Semien is not a franchise QB. Buffalo is going to be a huge underdog in both games. I never say never when it coms to winning games in the NFL, it would be a miracle if Buffalo comes through that stretch at 4-0. I would be pretty happy with 2-2 at that point.
mannc Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 The Broncos and Falcons are both good teams even if Trevor Semien is not a franchise QB. Buffalo is going to be a huge underdog in both games.Are you serious? You think the Bills will be "huge underdogs" at home against the Broncos?? The Bills will probably be favored by a point or two. At worst, pick 'em.
SaviorPeterman Posted September 12, 2017 Author Posted September 12, 2017 And they're one year removed from 6-10 and a terrible offense, production-wise. Look, I'm not saying it's a gimmie for us, but they aren't a vastly superior roster. If anything, they are strikingly similar. I don't think the Panthers are close to that 2015 roster unless Newton returns to that form. But still think they are far more talented across the board compared to the Bills roster which is to be expected since they really aren't in or close to a full blown rebuild like the Bills. Vegas nailed the Bills/Jets in week one with a 9 point spread and they will likely be close in this one too. I don't think the Bills lose in a blowout but the Panthers should be a TD better at home which should be close to the margin of victory.
BuffaloBaumer Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 I am just glad the Jets game is over so we can start to see what this team really is
Domdab99 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 The next three games for every team will pretty much tell us who they are, too. You're basically saying after a quarter of the season and we should see who the good teams are nd who the bad teams are. No ****.
JM2009 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 Feel better going into these games if the Bills had a real deep threat.
K D Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 You mean beating the Jets by 9 points doesn't get us to the super bowl? I thought we already made it based on some of these posts. I didn't realize there were 15 more games vs actual NFL caliber teams
row_33 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 I used to laugh at the thought, but with elite college teams getting more intense and NFL teams completely falling to pieces, could a top college team at home beat the Jets?
nedboy7 Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 They are an average team with no deep threat which is the strength of their QB
Recommended Posts