oldmanfan Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Because Jerry Sullivan. I like some of his stuff, when he writes about college stuff or golf he's good. But it's pretty clear he has a vendetta against the Bills and Sabres, likely because Pegula put him in his place when he bought the Sabres. And his colleague Bucky is unreadable. The recent one he did about how he used to be a Bills fan was self serving nonsense.
thenorthremembers Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) A win is a win. They have wideouts, they will use them. Gotta start taking it on a game by game basis and not overreact to the first one. With that being said I unfollowed all the Blitz reporters when they made it 3 dollars a month. Not a lot of money, but the content doesnt justify it. Will only miss Carruci and Trepasso. Edited September 11, 2017 by thenorthremembers
4merper4mer Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Thanks dad. Well try to do better. You missed ha point. He is calling all of us dad and singing the praises of his new and improved generation.
billsfan60 Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 You missed ha point. He is calling all of us dad and singing the praises of his new and improved generation. How did this world ever get along before these enlightened and superior youths showed us the way into a glorious tomorrow?
CSBill Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) Posted Today, 06:06 AM Billsmovinup, on 10 Sept 2017 - 11:52 PM, said: Thanks dad. Well try to do better. Being of that older generation, I missed the new English they're teaching these days: Is that "well" as in, "Well, I will try to do better"? Or, is it suppose to be "We'll try to do better"? Or, is it really, "Well try to do better"? In which case, I have no idea what that means. Edited September 11, 2017 by CSBill
Fixxxer Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 I don't mind the question but if you're a professional reporter and the team you follow dresses only 4 WR with 3 TEs and 4 RBs you should be able to deduce what's the gameplan for the day.
MAJBobby Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Perfectly legitimate question. However maybe a week or two early.
papazoid Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Jerry Sullivan: Bills win, but don't read too deeply into it The Bills had defeated the hapless Jets on Sunday, 21-12. The Jets were supposed to be the worst team in the league and played like it Remember the Rex Ryan model? Sunday was a reasonable facsimile. Run the ball, play strong defense and special teams and ask Taylor to play a conservative, mistake-free game and run from trouble when he has to. http://buffalonews.com/2017/09/10/bills-win-still-lack-vital-resources/
oldmanfan Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Perfectly legitimate question. However maybe a week or two early. And a straightforward answer fromMcDermott. So why not accept the answer?
eball Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 When the team has just put up over 400 yards of offense and controlled the game (converting 50% of 3rd downs), it's not really a reasonable post-game question to ask why the WRs weren't targeted more or to ridicule what the coach said about balance. Do people really not understand that? Those of you who are paying that $2.99 or clicking on Sully's columns are fools.
T-Bomb Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 I don't mind the question but if you're a professional reporter and the team you follow dresses only 4 WR with 3 TEs and 4 RBs you should be able to deduce what's the gameplan for the day. Great Avatar, F4 is one of my favorite games.
Tenhigh Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Because this is a passing league and you need good WR's to be anything other than a middling team. Does it really matter what position the players is who is catching the passes?Hell, I would take post routes thrown to Ritchie Incognito if he gets open and catches them.
Fixxxer Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Great Avatar, F4 is one of my favorite games.
papazoid Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Those of you who are paying that $2.99 or clicking on Sully's columns are fools. fyi....I have not paid an "extra" ($2.99) currently, I get the hard copy paper delivered on weekends only subscription because "online" access" is included (free) and is actually much cheaper than getting online access "only" without the paper. I prefer online content, the actual paper never comes out of the plastic wrapper.
baskingridgebillsfan Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 the thought the idea was to devise a game plan week to week to win . Maybe Jerry could have waited a few weeks to see if there is a trand developing
GunnerBill Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 When the team has just put up over 400 yards of offense and controlled the game (converting 50% of 3rd downs), it's not really a reasonable post-game question to ask why the WRs weren't targeted more or to ridicule what the coach said about balance. Do people really not understand that? I think the question is fine except for the tone, which as you say was a snarky attempt to ridicule. Fine to ask a question about why the receivers were not targeted more and the Bills gave an answer that made perfect sense to me. But with Jerry it is never just a question..... it is always asked in a snarky manner and to further or create a new agenda.
nucci Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Why the hell do we care about who gets how many targets? As long as we get down the field and score, isn't that all that matters? apparently not to some
NoSaint Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Why is it that when other teams tailor their offense to what defenses are doing it's smart, but when the Bills do it it's questioned? Because most of those teams receive questions about their strategies too, despite often having better track records of success. We are sensitive enough that coach can't even be asked questions now?
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Same reporter asked TT and McD about lack of WR targets compared to Clay and Shady. I'm not saying it is an unreasonable question. But it sounds like a question with an agenda as well. PS I love how TT handled the question about throwing over the middle with a sly smile and then saying "I slid for the first time" That would be Jerry "Agenda" Sullivan. I'm not worried about "lack of receiver targets". Lack of actually catching a ball that hits their body above the waist on the part of an eligible receiver worries me, especially on the goal line. Especially when it turns into an interception. Gotta catch it, Clay.
aristocrat Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 Dallas celebrated for big run game. Buffalo hated for it and called 1970s Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Recommended Posts