Royale with Cheese Posted September 8, 2017 Posted September 8, 2017 Unleashed like the Kraken? Will he rise up from the depths of Lake Erie and attack the Jets team bus?
BADOLBILZ Posted September 8, 2017 Posted September 8, 2017 This isn't news. It was obvious in preseason to anyone that has a clue that they were working on stuff. He will play football this week. He will move around and try to be a playmaker. The hope was to clean up some fundamentals without sacrificing his playmaking ability (just sacrificing his playmakers). They took the preseason to try to clean that up. Yeah we SPECIFICALLY saw this with Roman's offense as well.........Wood and Incognito looked absolutely finished that first summer of Rex because they were using the games to practice things offensively that they were not good at. But it wasn't particularly clever of Dennison and the Bills getting him hurt.......he got up got up limping after one sack in the first drive of preseason and went out staggering on the last and was under heavy pressure consistently in between.
KellyToughII Posted September 8, 2017 Posted September 8, 2017 After laughing I had to get somewhat depressed. Beane knows Real QB's, Franchise QB's guys that win superbowls do it 99% of the time from the pocket. Even Rogers and Wilson. So now they are going to let him be what he is, a Running back and they are excited about this? So do we have another HC in love with a guy who runs instead of a Quarterback who throws? The QB coach is way too giddy about this Bull crap. I pray Beane puts an end to it this offseason. If a guy hasn't become Franchise QB by now, he isn't going to.
grb Posted September 8, 2017 Posted September 8, 2017 (edited) Is there a stat line that would make people keep him for next year? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk There are three answers to this : No. Even if Taylor plays to virtual perfection, he'll still be in a run-first offense. He'll never put up the bulk numbers people demand to validate QB success. At best, he'll be described as a "game-manager". The god-like quarterback of people's dreams is not - repeat not - a game-manager. No. Even if Taylor plays to virtual perfection, Beane and McDermott are already committed to drafting his replacement. Given all the assets they've dumped to stockpile picks, draft-day high drama is a locked-in requirement. You think they could get away with spending those picks on a right tackle? The mob would be after them with blazing torches and pitchforks. Also, they're aware of team history. This millennia a Bill's head coach & GM typically lasts 2.5 years before being fired. A bright & shinny new QB buys them time they may well need. Which leads us to: Yes. If Taylor plays well, Beane and McDermott may want him back one more year to shield their new first-rounder Their very careers will be tied to their QB pick. If they throw him into the pool and he doesn't learn to swim, they better just jump right in after him. Of course Peterman might perform the role of stand-in, if they're comfortable with that. Edited September 8, 2017 by grb
jahbonas Posted September 8, 2017 Posted September 8, 2017 Hope so. But why get rid of Watkins. His deep ball is one of the best in the NFL. This staff does not belive in spending 13 million to the WR position - period ! Look at their history in Philly and Carolina. They believe in defensive 7 and off line
HappyDays Posted September 8, 2017 Author Posted September 8, 2017 Agreed, Watkins had a poor record with injuries. No one was sure he'd ever deliver a full season's worth of games. Also, people believed the Bills wouldn't be able to sign him next year anyway. Dumping him now got a decent return. If they waited they may have gotten much less. So there were legit reasons to trade him whether you supported the deal or not. But could we please lay off the idea anyone the Bills don't want is "culturally" deficient? Yes, Watkins has a trace of wide receiver diva in him - something glimpsed in one or two interviews a year. But only the slightest trace - and at a level which barely registers compared to his more egocentric peers. And aside from that, who ever heard a complaint about him as a professional or teammate? He started and ended last season playing on a broken foot. Wasn't that evidence of "culture"? This meme has now reached the point where Jonathan Williams is cut and people immediately decide it was because of his moral deficiency. Ron Darby was traded and suddenly Peter King at SI writes it was because Darby "hadn't bought into the new administration." There was no explanation of this statement; there were no examples given to illustrate it; there was no hint of this supposed problem before the trade; there wasn't a single bit of reporting on this "issue" until Darby was safely out of the state. Darby and Watkins were dumped for draft picks. Beane and McDermott are betting it all on the '18 draft. But they're big boys. They don't need us inventing reasons for their decisions. I don't think Darby or Williams had any kind of off the field problems, I'm just talking about Sammy. I thought it was really immature of him going to the Buffalo News and complaining about his targets. If he takes it to the coach and it leaks out, I have no problem with it. Him going public with that complaint was immature. Arguing with fans on Instagram was immature. Saying his receiver class would change the salary ceiling was immature. Celebrating too early in that Jets game and getting tackled was immature. It was a pattern with him. And he followed all of this up with his most injury ridden season yet. I didn't get the feeling that he really wanted to be here, and the coach/GM don't want to pay him what he thinks he's worth. They figured the likely high 2nd round pick is better than renting him for a year in a rush-heavy offense. I don't think McDermott ever wanted him back, they've been fielding trade calls for him all offseason.
yungmack Posted September 8, 2017 Posted September 8, 2017 After laughing I had to get somewhat depressed. Beane knows Real QB's, Franchise QB's guys that win superbowls do it 99% of the time from the pocket. Even Rogers and Wilson. So now they are going to let him be what he is, a Running back and they are excited about this? So do we have another HC in love with a guy who runs instead of a Quarterback who throws? The QB coach is way too giddy about this Bull crap. I pray Beane puts an end to it this offseason. If a guy hasn't become Franchise QB by now, he isn't going to. Oh, it's you again.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 They were 28 & 24 DVOA the last 2 years so they certainly weren't helping. I still blame Rex for more than anything over the last two years. He is the unquestioned reason for what went wrong the last 2 years. True that.
Deranged Rhino Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 They were 28 & 24 DVOA the last 2 years so they certainly weren't helping. I still blame Rex for more than anything over the last two years. He is the unquestioned reason for what went wrong the last 2 years. Which, if you think about it, is actually kind of an impressive feat. And we all know how much Rex loves impressive feet...
3rdand12 Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 (edited) This isn't news. It was obvious in preseason to anyone that has a clue that they were working on stuff. He will play football this week. He will move around and try to be a playmaker. The hope was to clean up some fundamentals without sacrificing his playmaking ability (just sacrificing his playmakers). They took the preseason to try to clean that up. seems too simple and obvious. go away you carzy person Edited September 9, 2017 by 3rdand12
GoBills808 Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 Of all the annoying and self-righteous things Rex Ryan did as HC of the Bills, convincing himself and half the fanbase that Tyrod Taylor was a viable option at quarterback has got to be near the top of the list.
3rdand12 Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 The dude was an alternate. There were people voted in ahead of him. They either couldn't or chose not to play, in turn he finally got the nod. Moreover, who the ef even cares about the Pro Bowl anymore? and he swings
jahbonas Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 Of all the annoying and self-righteous things Rex Ryan did as HC of the Bills, convincing himself and half the fanbase that Tyrod Taylor was a viable option at quarterback has got to be near the top of the list. Yes - 24pts a game ranking 9th in the league in scoring is "viable": - Rex's issue is his defense that gave up 200yrd games rushing too easily - but ya lets blame the QB
3rdand12 Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 This is all well, and good. But, I'm not sure there is a more pedestrian WR corp in the league. They haven't exactly set TT up for success in that regard-- at least looking at it from the outside. I predict a lot of dropped balls this season. why dropped balls? maybe nothing spectacular. But keep in mind YAC stats last couple years as well. i think the scheme will serve him and they absolutely are setting him up for success. But not dramatic stuff. Consistent chain movement is the goal. TOP is the goal. Field position as well. Not 76 yard TDs. not that there is anything wrong with that. Holmes is the Only WR i find suspect going into this season. and i worry about that
Crusher Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 They're not fooling anyone. Lots of smoke and mirrors behind Shady leading the way. It may work for a brief period of time if the line can still run block like they have been, but team's don't respect TT as a passer, and that will be exposed...to what degree yet, we do not know, but best case we still have the same pitfalls late in games where TT is forced into being a guy he's not. I'll be mildly amused watching TT finally being "unleashed", while actually cringing at the results that are sure to come.
3rdand12 Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 He sounds like a nice guy. But he is on a short leash this year. as well he should be. These guys run a system
GoBills808 Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 Yes - 24pts a game ranking 9th in the league in scoring is "viable": - Rex's issue is his defense that gave up 200yrd games rushing too easily - but ya lets blame the QB So points are what's important on offense (and somehow attributed to the QB), and on defense it's rushing yards? How predictably convenient.
3rdand12 Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 They were 28 & 24 DVOA the last 2 years so they certainly weren't helping. I still blame Rex for more than anything over the last two years. He is the unquestioned reason for what went wrong the last 2 years. no question, just hope Bills can recover quickly. Not sure we can though. Bit of a hole the fat phuckers drilled
Steptide Posted September 9, 2017 Posted September 9, 2017 If he throws his typical 185 yards per game this Sunday, I won't be impressed. However, if he has say 285 yards and 2 or 3 tds, I'll have hope
Recommended Posts