Cherrybone Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 I'm asking because I do believe this is a bold way to go. Eventually this will be a very young inexperienced team with a few veterans here and there. The questions I have are, will the fanbase be patient enough after a 17 to 18yr drought? Can you attract veterans with such a young team that's inexperienced? The one that really worries me is what if these picks don't pan out? How do you recover? I really want to understand and believe in the process. I just feel like it's like gambling your last bit of money away.
Gugny Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 If, after what Beane has done this offseason (which I love, by the way), they don't draft well ... this team is screwed for a long, long time.
SinceThe70s Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 (edited) If, after what Beane has done this offseason (which I love, by the way), they don't draft well ... this team is screwed for a long, long time. I think this sums up where we've been and hopefully where we aren't going. Edited September 6, 2017 by SinceThe70s
SoCal Deek Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 Let me make it simple. If you don't draft well, you are already screwed. Free agency was made to fill in limited holes in a roster well built by the draft. It was NOT intended to build a team from scratch.
Boatdrinks Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 Well in McBeanes defense, the best proven way to build a team is through the draft. Purging many of the team's recent picks is somewhat contradictory to this plan. The answer to your question is simple. if the new FO doesn't draft extremely well in the next couple of years, they will be fired and fans will get to enjoy " the process" all over again.
Cherrybone Posted September 6, 2017 Author Posted September 6, 2017 Well in McBeanes defense, the best proven way to build a team is through the draft. Purging many of the team's recent picks is somewhat contradictory to this plan. The answer to your question is simple. if the new FO doesn't draft extremely well in the next couple of years, they will be fired and fans will get to enjoy " the process" all over again. And this is the scary part.
Fadingpain Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 I'm asking because I do believe this is a bold way to go. Eventually this will be a very young inexperienced team with a few veterans here and there. The questions I have are, will the fanbase be patient enough after a 17 to 18yr drought? Can you attract veterans with such a young team that's inexperienced? The one that really worries me is what if these picks don't pan out? How do you recover? I really want to understand and believe in the process. I just feel like it's like gambling your last bit of money away. If these picks don't pan out, we suck. Back to where we've been for an entire generation. No big deal.
SinceThe70s Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 Well in McBeanes defense, the best proven way to build a team is through the draft. Purging many of the team's recent picks is somewhat contradictory to this plan. The answer to your question is simple. if the new FO doesn't draft extremely well in the next couple of years, they will be fired and fans will get to enjoy " the process" all over again. I don't think it's contradictory if you think the previous regime did a poor job drafting. Like it or not, we are hitched to McBeane until they prove or disprove themselves...and yes we're back on the next 3 year plan if they fail. What's the alternative to hiring guys and giving them a chance to succeed?
rant_and_go Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 No way 18 years of picks have all been bad.It's not the new guys. It's how they're used. No one in Buffalo has been willing to win.McD knowing how to play football only one way is a bad start. Work with what's in front of you.
TheBrownBear Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 If these picks don't pan out, we suck. Back to where we've been for an entire generation. No big deal. Exactly. Lol. And "building through the draft" isn't a bold move. It's how every successful NFL team is constructed. It's not like baseball or basketball where you can buy a team of superstars.
Boatdrinks Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 I don't think it's contradictory if you think the previous regime did a poor job drafting. Like it or not, we are hitched to McBeane until they prove or disprove themselves...and yes we're back on the next 3 year plan if they fail. What's the alternative to hiring guys and giving them a chance to succeed? The recent records of this team would show that the drafting wasn't that poor. At least not talent wise. They weren't 2-14. Not being able to find useful guys among the youngest and most recent picks is a red flag for the creativity of this staff/ GM. There is no alternative to giving them a chance to succeed. But you only get so many draft picks and the end game of this project seems further away than it did 6 months ago.
PromoTheRobot Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 Make sure you have 2 picks in every round.
QCity Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 And this is the scary part. The scary part is the bust rate of 1st round QBs.
The Frankish Reich Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 The thing with putting all your eggs in the draft basket: if it fails, you do it all over again! It's not like re-signing a couple Dareuses to ridiculous contracts that limit your options for the next few years.
Big Blitz Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 Aren't you always building through the draft? I mean don't draft TJ Graham over Russell Wilson or Marcel Dareus over JJ Watt, Tyron Smith, AJ Green, and Julio Jones. Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Gugny Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 Aren't you always building through the draft? I mean don't draft TJ Graham over Russell Wilson or Marcel Dareus over JJ Watt, Tyron Smith, AJ Green, and Julio Jones. Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk What the hell are you tapatalking about? MMQB much?
billsfan89 Posted September 6, 2017 Posted September 6, 2017 If you draft poorly in the NFL you are !@#$ed anyway. Free agency is a good way to supplement needs but you can't build a sustainable window of winning with a bunch of high end free agency signings. A high volume of trades tend to not work out either. You can make a big splash trade now and again if you are close to winning and need a piece to get you over the top. In the end you have to build through the draft and the Bills have the picks to do so. I also think that the Bills haven't bagged this season all that much. Jordan Matthews and Gains may be less talented than Watkins and Darby but a healthy Jordan Matthews for 16 games is a much bigger contributor than Watkins over the course of 6. Gaines is a much better fit for the scheme than Darby too. So in a way they might be slightly better due to fit and health.
Recommended Posts