VADC Bills Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 His drafts and cap mismanagement speak for themselves, but.... From Marrone to Rex to McDermott, I still find it baffling our GM in title couldn't have primary say in who our HC should have been. 4 years, 3 coaches...smh I agree. I think the main reason we didn't make the playoffs were due to coaching errors. Rex would give away 2 games a year. I don't blame Whaley for that. We are a team that needed 2-3 more wins a season. I think the new regime is taking the long path to gaining those 2-3 more victories. I think they are going about things wrong. I hope I am wrong and they do deserve a chance.
Magox Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 (edited) That's true. I am 36; that is true too. It's not relevant either but it's true. I do? I didn't know those were the rules? FWIW, I loved the way that they manipulated the draft and the talent that they acquired early. I'm not sure, outside of Peterman, that the mid to late rounds were good. In general I think that they did poorly in FA. Hyde can play but in general the guys that were added are not good. Obviously it's early but so far they have done a bad job assembling the roster. They are in a rebuilding period and have the 3rd oldest team in football. That's stupid. Honest question for those that are happy, what that has been done has impressed you? What gives you so much confidence?the overwhelming majority of the moves have been headscratching at best. It's not a matter of me approving or disapproving their decisions, i dont know how they will turn out and neither do you, so for you to proclaim that Whaley is a better accumulator of talent when Beane hasn't even had a single draft is silly. There is no justifying your statement, zero, zilch. You can doubt their decisions, believe them to be god awful, what have you but you cannot rationally make the proclamation that you did. Edited September 4, 2017 by Magox 1
stinky finger Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 Yes I am. The municipality i work for is off tomorrow and friday. Three day week then another three day weekend. Then I can watch the Bills lose to the Jesters. enjoy don't forget, you have a book report due.
JoeF Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 Every time a GM or a coach has been fired since Wade Phillips and John Butler it has meant that the Bills failed to produce a winner and missed the playoffs. I miss Whaley because I hoped he would be the GM to deliver a playoff birth. It didn't happen. I will miss Brandon Beane and Sean McDermott if they are fired for not producing a winner. That being said -- I think the Pegulas plan to give both McDermott and Beane a 5 year runway...and plan to tune us all out until about year 3....
WildBills Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 enjoy don't forget, you have a book report due. 15 years ago maybe.
Kirby Jackson Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 It's not a matter of me approving or disapproving their decisions, i dont know how they will turn out and neither do you, so for you to proclaim that Whaley is a better accumulator of talent when Beane hasn't even had a single draft is silly. There is no justifying your statement, zero, zilch. You can doubt their decisions, believe them to be god awful, what have you but you cannot rationally make the proclamation that you did. At the exact same time you can't say it's untrue. If you want to play the "we do t know anything until we see it happen" card you can. I will bet though that the results are inferior to where they were a year ago. They will have better coaching with McDermott but I will be surprised if they win more games. IMO, that means that they have less talent. Do you disagree?
Magox Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 At the exact same time you can't say it's untrue. If you want to play the "we do t know anything until we see it happen" card you can. I will bet though that the results are inferior to where they were a year ago. They will have better coaching with McDermott but I will be surprised if they win more games. IMO, that means that they have less talent. Do you disagree?Kirby, they have traded alot of players for future picks. The reasonable thing to do is wait to see how the draft picks pan out and a couple off seasons of building the team around that nucleus. Make no bones about it, the engine that they envision that will power this organization will be through the draft. And after those picks are made then you'll see more activity in FA. They are going to have lots of cap room in the coming years
Scott7975 Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 (edited) No, because ultimately you need to win games in the NFL. If the Bills go 5-11, 4-12, 6-10, then this current GM-coach combo get shown the door. I disagree with that. If they go 4-12 or whatever they will get some good draft picks. They may actually finally get us a franchise QB and do a good job building the roster. Nobody knows yet. If they fook up the draft and then proceed to have another crap season then yeah they should be purged like the roster just was. This staff isn't trying to get us another 8-8 crap season. They aren't even trying to get us to barely a wild card one and done. They are trying to build a team that can compete for many years to come. The purge is necessary to that. Although I do agree they are doing it bass ackwards. I am at least willing to give them a few years to see what they do and not just one off season of dumping low grade players. Edited September 4, 2017 by Scott7975
stinky finger Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 15 years ago maybe. I hated book reports
JoeF Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 At the exact same time you can't say it's untrue. If you want to play the "we do t know anything until we see it happen" card you can. I will bet though that the results are inferior to where they were a year ago. They will have better coaching with McDermott but I will be surprised if they win more games. IMO, that means that they have less talent. Do you disagree? There is less talent at this time this year than last. I could argue that almost every position group has been downgraded but K and P. Some of its due to age (DL); some of its due to scheme changes (OL), wrong fit talent (QB)...but I agree we will be better coached. Here is where I diverge -- there is no way Whaley could have been retained. He was fired the day of the "I was not privy" press conference. The owner should have taken that hit -- but Whaley ended up looking powerless at best, foolish at worst. The PR part of the job may not be important to some but it is to Kim Pegula. There is no way she wanted the franchise represented that way. I think the Bills did the right thing by moving on from Whaley after the draft. Beane could not have put together the staff he has until after the draft. Beane has taken the philosophy of correct it all now and bottom out--McDermott has embraced that because he wants a team of personalities that fit his. The talent ebb is a natural progression of remaking a team largely in one year. In terms of the downgrade in talent-- there are a bunch of things we will never know-- was Sammy a malcontent/unsignable WR with a potential chronic injury; had Darby regressed and lost confidence; did Ragland's knee impact questionable mobility even more; is JWill a fumbler who didn't show the work ethic to improve...I don't know.....
Max Fischer Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 There is less talent at this time this year than last. I could argue that almost every position group has been downgraded but K and P. Some of its due to age (DL); some of its due to scheme changes (OL), wrong fit talent (QB)...but I agree we will be better coached. Here is where I diverge -- there is no way Whaley could have been retained. He was fired the day of the "I was not privy" press conference. The owner should have taken that hit -- but Whaley ended up looking powerless at best, foolish at worst. The PR part of the job may not be important to some but it is to Kim Pegula. There is no way she wanted the franchise represented that way. I think the Bills did the right thing by moving on from Whaley after the draft. Beane could not have put together the staff he has until after the draft. Beane has taken the philosophy of correct it all now and bottom out--McDermott has embraced that because he wants a team of personalities that fit his. The talent ebb is a natural progression of remaking a team largely in one year. In terms of the downgrade in talent-- there are a bunch of things we will never know-- was Sammy a malcontent/unsignable WR with a potential chronic injury; had Darby regressed and lost confidence; did Ragland's knee impact questionable mobility even more; is JWill a fumbler who didn't show the work ethic to improve...I don't know..... +1
Yav Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 His drafts and cap mismanagement speak for themselves, but.... From Marrone to Rex to McDermott, I still find it baffling our GM in title couldn't have primary say in who our HC should have been. 4 years, 3 coaches...smh I can agree that cap management was bad but you can't put any of the coaching hires on him. Marrone was a Brandon, Nix hire and Rex & McD were Pegulla hires. We will never know what this team would have done had he hired the coach. I'm not saying he should have stayed, rather a GM and coach need to be on the same page.
Chilly Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 Kirby, they have traded alot of players for future picks. The reasonable thing to do is wait to see how the draft picks pan out and a couple off seasons of building the team around that nucleus. Make no bones about it, the engine that they envision that will power this organization will be through the draft. And after those picks are made then you'll see more activity in FA. They are going to have lots of cap room in the coming years Yes, they have lots of draft equity, but the hit rate on most of those picks is low. They traded away good talent for picks that, at most, have a 50% success rate on average across the board. If they were trading around people that wouldn't fit on the team in 2-3 years (like Shady), that's one thing. I don't see how trading away a guy like Sammy for a pick that even has a 50/50 shot of making the NFL is a good move, regardless of how it ends up working out.
Billsguy Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 No, not even a little bit. Whaley was a proven failure. No, he is not missed! The new regime is on their way to proving it, but we won't know for 2-3 years. After a 3-13 season they may be off to a good start though. Embrace the TANK !!!!
Kirby Jackson Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 (edited) Kirby, they have traded alot of players for future picks. The reasonable thing to do is wait to see how the draft picks pan out and a couple off seasons of building the team around that nucleus. Make no bones about it, the engine that they envision that will power this organization will be through the draft. And after those picks are made then you'll see more activity in FA. They are going to have lots of cap room in the coming years...and I'm all for a rebuild. I just don't think in a rebuild you keep players like Tolbert and dispense Jonathan Williams. You don't jettison guys that are in their low 20's for guys in their low 30's. That's what is so stupid. I'm not going to call it confusing or puzzling. It's stupid. If the Bills were clearing out high priced vets to try young guys while taking their lumps I could get behind it. They kept guys like Ducasse, Philly Brown (since released) and Holmes while letting promising young players like Reilly and Williams go. That's not how you rebuild. You don't assemble the 3rd oldest roster in the league and "go from there." Edited September 4, 2017 by Kirby Jackson
Rico Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 ...and I'm all for a rebuild. I just don't think in a rebuild you keep players like Tolbert and dispense Jonathan Williams. You don't jettison guys that are in their low 29's for guys in their low 30's. That's what is so stupid. I'm not going to call it confusing or puzzling. It's stupid. If the Bills were clearing out high priced vets to try young guys while taking their lumps I could get behind it. They kept guys like Ducasse, Philly Brown (since released) and Holmes while letting promising young players like Reilly and Williams go. That's not how you rebuild. You don't assemble the 3rd oldest roster in the league and "go from there." If the guys in the low 20's (like JWill) aren't very good, it really doesn't matter.
Kirby Jackson Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 (edited) If the guys in the low 20's (like JWill) aren't very good, it really doesn't matter.Darby, Sammy, Seymour...we know your feelings on the previous regime but that doesn't make it right either. Try to explain, in a rebuild, why you'd assemble the 3rd oldest roster in football? Edited September 4, 2017 by Kirby Jackson
Magox Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 ...and I'm all for a rebuild. I just don't think in a rebuild you keep players like Tolbert and dispense Jonathan Williams. You don't jettison guys that are in their low 20's for guys in their low 30's. That's what is so stupid. I'm not going to call it confusing or puzzling. It's stupid. If the Bills were clearing out high priced vets to try young guys while taking their lumps I could get behind it. They kept guys like Ducasse, Philly Brown (since released) and Holmes while letting promising young players like Reilly and Williams go. That's not how you rebuild. You don't assemble the 3rd oldest roster in the league and "go from there."That's a separate argument and a legitimate gripe to have even though I'm not so sure I agree, but there is no way anyone can reasonably say at this stage if Beane is going to be good at accumulating talent
JOE IN HAMPTON ROADS Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 I agree changing D schemes hurt Whaley, but he was a weak drafter, poor at cap management, did not find franchise QB (in fact put in little effort as he stuck with his guy EJ), traded up far too often (1,1,2,4,4,4 for Watkins & Ragland is ridiculous). Whaley was a good pro scout, especially on the D side of the ball, but was overmatched as a GM. All you have to do is watch the footage of him pitching EJ to realize just how out of his depth he was. Dude literally fell in love with EJ and just couldn't quit him. He ruined the offense trying to give EJ a chance, and continued to push EJ long after it was clear EJ couldn't perform.
Kirby Jackson Posted September 4, 2017 Posted September 4, 2017 That's a separate argument and a legitimate gripe to have even though I'm not so sure I agree, but there is no way anyone can reasonably say at this stage if Beane is going to be good at accumulating talentThere's no way to reasonably argue that he's good at it either. We can only judge based on the decisions that he's made. So far, he's been wrong more than right IMO.
Recommended Posts