Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is a popular preseason Peterman posse posture without anyone seeing the Dennison offense specific tailored to suit the strengths of Taylor. We shall soon see. How's that for alliteration?

Great alliteration. And that Taylor take is typical of tormented fans trying to project tangible traits of top QBs to Nate.

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

 

This is a popular preseason Peterman posse posture without anyone seeing the Dennison offense specific tailored to suit the strengths of Taylor. We shall soon see. How's that for alliteration?

Oh you mean Lynn's offense of making a very simple run all the time offense that is Taylor made easy, so easy teams game plan to make Tyrod stay in the pocket and be a QB. SMH

If this staff is making a Taylor made offensive scheme they should just pack their bags now teams already know how to keep Tyrod in check.

Edited by xRUSHx
Posted

Let's assume that is true, who is then to blame?

They went in a different direction with the offense. McDermott hired Dennison so it's his fault for trying to stick a square peg in a round hole with Tyrod in an offense that doesn't suit him. They set him up for failure and they made it clear that McD is not hitching his wagon to Tyrod and wants to bring in his own QB. Tyrod isn't great but he has certain skills that can win you games given the opportunity. Peterman is more suited for this offense. I'm not saying he's better he's just in a better position to succeed given the circumstances

Posted

"he hasent completed a significant throw downfield" - except the one to zay in the eagles game, which was about as good of a deepnthrow as it gets. Also, Taylor hasent completed a throw down field in the entire pre season. I'll cut him a little slack due to the fact he didn't play alot. But I keep hearing how Peterman is a rookie. So? He's played better than anyone expected and the kid looks to have "it"

Posted (edited)

http://buffalonews.com/2017/09/01/sullys-mailbag-lets-pump-brakes-peterman/

"Peterman looked good in Thursday's game. He shows some of the quick decision-making in the pocket that Taylor lacks. But he's a rookie. He's been facing mostly backups. He was average in the first two games. He hasn't completed a significant throw down the field.

Why wouldn't he start right now? Because it's Taylor job, assuming he's out of concussion protocol for the Jets game. I don't think Tyrod is a franchise QB. But the Bills scored 399 points with him last season, which was the most they scored since Doug Flutie's big year in 1998 and more than the last two Super Bowl teams with Jim Kelly."

Now Sullivan the clown is your voice of reason because it fits your argument. Sad!

 

Taylor stinks and Peterman is better so let's start the QB who is worse, makes total sense if you have no idea what you're talking about.

All you naysayers will see the light come next sunday, should Taylor start, and what's sad about that is that light has been so bright since the start alot of you have been blinded and can't see the reality of things. Actually kind of ignorant like the coach has been on the QBs and is right now with Ducasse vs Miller.

 

They are jettisoning guys who don't "fit the scheme" and Taylor 100% does not fit the scheme yet they are going to start him, makes no sense and kind of hypocritical to everybody else in the lockerroom.

 

I get why he is starting Tyrod over Peterman. IMO it's because of comfort, he's not starting the better QB, Taylor is the vet, coach is scared to start the rookie because if he looks bad then coach looks bad, he doesn't want that, can't look like anymore of a clown show than what has transpired within the team up until now.

 

The best thing for this team is if Taylor stays in concussion protocol for about a month and never sees the field again in a Bills uniform.

 

Sullivan, what a hack.

Edited by old school
Posted

This season will be a disaster so at some point I'd like to see what Peterman can do. However, Taylor should start. When we are 3-8, switch to Nathan for 5 games!

Posted

http://buffalonews.com/2017/09/01/sullys-mailbag-lets-pump-brakes-peterman/

"Peterman looked good in Thursday's game. He shows some of the quick decision-making in the pocket that Taylor lacks. But he's a rookie. He's been facing mostly backups. He was average in the first two games. He hasn't completed a significant throw down the field.

Why wouldn't he start right now? Because it's Taylor job, assuming he's out of concussion protocol for the Jets game. I don't think Tyrod is a franchise QB. But the Bills scored 399 points with him last season, which was the most they scored since Doug Flutie's big year in 1998 and more than the last two Super Bowl teams with Jim Kelly."

Sensible take but this was the same thinking on Dak Prescott last preseason too until it wasn't.

Posted

Sensible take but this was the same thinking on Dak Prescott last preseason too until it wasn't.

But that situation is by far the exception and not the rule.

Posted

It`s still BUFFALO. They have a great QB prospect right under their noses . And we will waste our 1st rounders next year on that can`t miss Qb. Go Bills ?

 

Great? He has yet to demonstrate that he's anything close to that. Becoming a competent NFL QB is possible.

Posted

Great alliteration. And that Taylor take is typical of tormented fans trying to project tangible traits of top QBs to Nate.

I will just say no projection needed. TT flat sucks, and Peterman shows better decision making skills, AND moves this offense, better as a rookie

Posted

He looks as good as the Qbs picked in the 1st round this yr.

 

Not to my eyes, but he did look good on Thursday against the Lions' backup defense running vanilla schemes. Before then, he looked okay.

Posted (edited)

You know how Buffalo works- every QB who stumbles onto the roster deserves his chance to prove he is not the next Tom Brady.

 

Levi Brown, Jeff Tuel, Brian Brohm they all deserved their shot and didn't get a fair shake.

Edited by Straight Hucklebuck
Posted

Now Sullivan the clown is your voice of reason because it fits your argument. Sad!

 

Taylor stinks and Peterman is better so let's start the QB who is worse, makes total sense if you have no idea what you're talking about.

All you naysayers will see the light come next sunday, should Taylor start, and what's sad about that is that light has been so bright since the start alot of you have been blinded and can't see the reality of things. Actually kind of ignorant like the coach has been on the QBs and is right now with Ducasse vs Miller.

 

They are jettisoning guys who don't "fit the scheme" and Taylor 100% does not fit the scheme yet they are going to start him, makes no sense and kind of hypocritical to everybody else in the lockerroom.

 

I get why he is starting Tyrod over Peterman. IMO it's because of comfort, he's not starting the better QB, Taylor is the vet, coach is scared to start the rookie because if he looks bad then coach looks bad, he doesn't want that, can't look like anymore of a clown show than what has transpired within the team up until now.

 

The best thing for this team is if Taylor stays in concussion protocol for about a month and never sees the field again in a Bills uniform.

 

Sullivan, what a hack.

Right on man, very nicely said.
Posted

that system is gone though. Nate is better in this system

How do you know what this system is????

 

Rico is creating his own scheme for the first time in his career. And he's no idiot. He's not showing his cards before he has too.

Posted

What's with the pumping the brakes theme on Peterman articles. Can't professional writers come up wth original analogies?

×
×
  • Create New...