BobbyC81 Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 Whether the Bills mgmt recognizes shortcomings of O-Line or lack of WR speed, I wouldn't be surprised at another deal, even if it's a low level move.
Augie Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 Whether the Bills mgmt recognizes shortcomings of O-Line or lack of WR speed, I wouldn't be surprised at another deal, even if it's a low level move. What can we get for a slightly used OLine coach?
Kirby Jackson Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 (edited) Whether the Bills mgmt recognizes shortcomings of O-Line or lack of WR speed, I wouldn't be surprised at another deal, even if it's a low level move.I tend to agree. They can't be happy with the offense so far. It has been atrocious. I don't know what the see in Ducasse. I think that the OL will be okay if healthy. A Ragland for Dorsett trade makes so much sense. Edited August 27, 2017 by Kirby Jackson
EmotionallyUnstable Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 This new regime has too much pride to acknowledge shortcomings unless they are part of the previous regime Don't expect any picks being given up so player for player? Unlikely
BuffAlone Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 This new regime has too much pride to acknowledge shortcomings unless they are part of the previous regime Don't expect any picks being given up so player for player? Unlikely What makes you say that they have too much pride?
4merper4mer Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 What makes you say that they have too much pride? Beane's annoyance at fans for seeing the obvious perhaps?
transient Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 What can we get for a slightly used OLine coach? More than what you could get if you threw a worn-out-his-welcome ST coach into the mix with him.
EmotionallyUnstable Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 What makes you say that they have too much pride? I get the sense that they blindly believe in their system or "process" Even at the expense of benefiting the roster
4merper4mer Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 Ragland will be traded. Who on God's green Earth is going to give up anything for a guy made for 1970s football whose coach just said is fighting to stay on the roster? What would that team give up for him?
EmotionallyUnstable Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 They are smarter then all of us. 1) you're probably right 2) our average intelligence isn't that impressive so that doesn't necessarily speak well for the Bills 3) I've seen your thoughts recently. You don't deny this
Pirate Angel Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 I tend to agree. They can't be happy with the offense so far. It has been atrocious. I don't know what the see in Ducasse. I think that the OL will be okay if healthy. A Ragland for Dorsett trade makes so much sense. I believe ducasse has naked pictures of McDermott s wife
Beast Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 I get the sense that they blindly believe in their system or "process" Even at the expense of benefiting the roster So, in other words, you have nothing of significance to back up your statement. Just your incredible "sense".
boyst Posted August 27, 2017 Posted August 27, 2017 i don't think the next trade, which i expect in the next two days, will be one we expect. it could be something like Charles Clay traded or Eric Wood - which would be quite shocking and healthy step toward our building. I am really surprised on Hughes who seems to have turned a bit of a corner this year and I am happy with that. Otherwise, I expected him traded soon. Right now Ragland for a 5th or 6th conditional Kyle Williams for a 3rd if I could get it - or a downfield target / big body big radius target charles clay for a backup rt
87168 Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 (edited) i don't think the next trade, which i expect in the next two days, will be one we expect. it could be something like Charles Clay traded or Eric Wood - which would be quite shocking and healthy step toward our building. I am really surprised on Hughes who seems to have turned a bit of a corner this year and I am happy with that. Otherwise, I expected him traded soon. Right now Ragland for a 5th or 6th conditional Kyle Williams for a 3rd if I could get it - or a downfield target / big body big radius target charles clay for a backup rt Kyle Williams should retire a Bill. He should mean more than a pick or questionable trade, to both the fans and FO Edited August 28, 2017 by 87168
Samwell Tarly Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 Trade possibilities: Tyrod Taylor to Broncos for mid round draft pick. Shady McCoy to whoever loses a feature back early for a 2nd round draft pick. Charles Clay for 3rd round draft pick. Reggie Ragland to Toronto Argonauts for $20 Tim Hortons gift card.
BuffAlone Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 Beane's annoyance at fans for seeing the obvious perhaps?They've signed players, they've released players, they've traded players. That don't seem like a pride issue at all. It seems more like they're just trying to build a roster. What exact moves have they made that are so erroneous that their pride has to be tested?
fansince88 Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 Kyle Williams should retire a Bill. He should mean more than a pick or questionable trade, to both the fans and FO 2 thumbs up
Rico Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 i don't think the next trade, which i expect in the next two days, will be one we expect. it could be something like Charles Clay traded or Eric Wood - which would be quite shocking and healthy step toward our building. I am really surprised on Hughes who seems to have turned a bit of a corner this year and I am happy with that. Otherwise, I expected him traded soon. Right now Ragland for a 5th or 6th conditional Kyle Williams for a 3rd if I could get it - or a downfield target / big body big radius target charles clay for a backup rt I wouldn't trade Clay, he looks pretty good to me this pre-season.
Recommended Posts