Jump to content

How soon til Trump Resigns


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 283
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Trump attacked the media, the intelligent agencies, and establishment politicians on the campaign trail and they responded in kind. He also has a lot of sanctimonious Never Trump "intellectual conservatives" speaking out against him going way back before the election. All groups are rooting for him to fail and it's just sad.

All groups? The Republicans in Congress sure have tried to work with the clown. No one that works with Trump comes out clean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

:lol: Three unemployed idiots. I have a job.

 

I wasn't referring to you... but...

Let's go on record: are you also in favor of unilaterally suspending the rights of individuals for thought crimes?

 

Suspending their rights? Unilaterally? No.

 

Nor do I think that's really what any of this has to do with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All groups? The Republicans in Congress sure have tried to work with the clown. No one that works with Trump comes out clean.

I think from day one the GOP establishment's strategy is and will continue to be trying to get Pence in as president without losing Trump's base that HE established.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Suspending their rights? Unilaterally? No.

 

Nor do I think that's really what any of this has to do with.

That's what the majority of the back and forth on this topic has been here.

 

Some individuals seem to think that it's desirable for individuals to be able to assault other individuals without repercussion, and confiscate their firearms, for expressing their views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what the majority of the back and forth on this topic has been here.

 

Some individuals seem to think that it's desirable for individuals to be able to assault other individuals without repercussion, and confiscate their firearms, for expressing their views.

 

That is a stupid thing to debate. There are two hundred plus years of Supreme Court jurisprudence that carefully and, in my view, appropriately outline the limits of the First Amendment (including, specifically, where protected speech crosses over into direct incitements of violence). There is no societal value added from having subhumans and sociopaths debate each other about that well-settled issue on the flea-infested taint of a football message board.

 

And in any event, it's an entirely separate issue from what the role of the President of the United States should be when speaking about such divisive issues during divisive times like these...

Edited by Coach Tuesday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing how many people are actively cheering on a coup d'état against the American government. FORWARD!

 

:beer: without doing any critical thinking of their own.

 

posting pics of swastika-covered books is no crime.

 

Still, you could have done something else to make your point. I didn't think I'd ever see the day where people on this board trivialized genocide.

 

Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid than you already have. Those books do not trivialize geonocide. Of course you'd know that if you tried reading books before burning them.

 

:lol: If I don't have a job, then why have I hated it so much for the past twelve years.

I'm guessing you hate your job because you can't beat up those you disagree with there. Like that time Tim brought in a tuna salad sandwich for lunch and you accused him of supporting dolphin geonocide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing you hate your job because you can't beat up those you disagree with there. Like that time Tim brought in a tuna salad sandwich for lunch and you accused him of supporting dolphin geonocide.

 

Technically, genocide can only be performed against people. I think you mean flippocide.

 

Hey, 34?

 

517CM2AFC7L._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

 

BOO! Scary book! Burn it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That is a stupid thing to debate. There are two hundred plus years of Supreme Court jurisprudence that carefully and, in my view, appropriately outline the limits of the First Amendment (including, specifically, where protected speech crosses over into direct incitements of violence). There is no societal value added from having subhumans and sociopaths debate each other about that well-settled issue on the flea-infested taint of a football message board.

 

And in any event, it's an entirely separate issue from what the role of the President of the United States should be when speaking about such divisive issues during divisive times like these...

I would have thought it was a stupid thing to debate as well, yet a massive percentage of the country, being led around by their elected representatives and voices in the media have pushed the issue following the nonsense in Charlottesville, and so here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I heard he's 6 Republican Votes away from the time when they can walk into his office and say You're Fired.

'Art of the Deal' Ghostwriter Thinks President Trump Will Resign Before the End of the Year

The ghostwriter of Donald Trump's famous memoir The Art of the Deal doubled down on his prediction

that's not how it works. At all.

 

I'm done with you, Tom... I know I've called you things like a f*#!ing idiot, a piece of f%$ing garbage, and a Piece of S#!t, but you should know I never actually believed any of that until yesterday.

 

posting pics of swastika-covered books is no crime.

 

Still, you could have done something else to make your point. I didn't think I'd ever see the day where people on this board trivialized genocide.

can you do me next? My prostate is thirsty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That is a stupid thing to debate. There are two hundred plus years of Supreme Court jurisprudence that carefully and, in my view, appropriately outline the limits of the First Amendment (including, specifically, where protected speech crosses over into direct incitements of violence). There is no societal value added from having subhumans and sociopaths debate each other about that well-settled issue on the flea-infested taint of a football message board.

 

 

Yeah, one would figure that the consistently established legal precedents wouldn't be subject to debate. But here we are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid than you already have. Those books do not trivialize geonocide. Of course you'd know that if you tried reading books before burning them.

 

 

 

Please, put down the moron sandwich for just one second.

 

Tom posted the COVER of the book. If he had posted a meaningful passage from the book, and THEN the cover, it would have made a grown-up statement.

 

Instead, the statement he made, was "Oooh look at my swastika!" -Stupid.

Edited by #34fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...