4merper4mer Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Just wanted an affirmation that you don't not some passive meely mouthed, I haven't avowed violence... Unless again its protecting your goaltender or capping Tom Brady's knees. All for the Brady hit and antifa or Nazis are fine to carry it out too. Maybe they can team up. I don't understand your first sentence. If I read it right I find it strange and accusatory that you would assume that I would be for violence from any pack of morons whether they be Nazis, Islamists, Antifa commies or whatever. I'm not.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 I dont support them Joe anymore than you support Nazi's... quit it... They are anti right but dont recognize its a circle not a continuum... violent left and right meet on the other side and both are command and control oligops Im sure you can find flags some of them fly and are communists but they are not that monolithic. Either way they support violence as a way to confront what they deem the opposition right. So Joe do you support right wing violence... haven't seen you disabow it only attack the antifas. Really DC you are lumping socialists with communists... common man, like lumping conservatives with neo nazis Despite what 34 would have you believe, I've said numerous times I don't support the inbreds either.
LeviF Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 (edited) All for the Brady hit and antifa or Nazis are fine to carry it out too. Maybe they can team up. I don't understand your first sentence. If I read it right I find it strange and accusatory that you would assume that I would be for violence from any pack of morons whether they be Nazis, Islamists, Antifa commies or whatever. I'm not. Despite what 34 would have you believe, I've said numerous times I don't support the inbreds either. Do not respond to leftist demands that you disavow this, that, or the other thing. It's a tactic used to police how you talk about things. You'll notice the leftists in this thread feel free to use very strong language to attack conservative positions while claiming it is offensive that conservatives use strong language to attack leftist positions. They will conflate your "disavowal" with permission to not just attack far-right positions, but to attack any conservative/traditional position. They will not extend to you the same courtesy. The game is not dialectic, it's rhetoric. Anytime you engage in dialectic with a leftist you will lose because that's not what people respond to now. Edited August 22, 2017 by LeviF91
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Do not respond to leftist demands that you disavow this, that, or the other thing. It's a tactic used to police how you talk about things. You'll notice the leftists in this thread feel free to use very strong language to attack conservative positions while claiming it is offensive that conservatives use strong language to attack leftist positions. They will conflate your "disavowal" with permission to not just attack far-right positions, but to attack any conservative/traditional position. They will not extend to you the same courtesy. The game is not dialectic, it's rhetoric. Anytime you engage in dialectic with a leftist you will lose because that's not what people respond to now. Excellent points. You're really correct, you can't engage a leftist in rational dialogue.
DC Tom Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Excellent points. You're really correct, you can't engage a leftist in rational dialogue. Hell, you can't even call them dipshits without them getting all dipshitty.
boyst Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Ex-Breitbart official warns site could back Trump impeachment if he goes the other way A former spokesperson for Breitbart has warned that the conservative media outlet could try and help get President Trump impeached if he stops supporting their issues. Kurt Bardella said on CNN Monday, Breitbart is going to go fully aggressive at the agenda that they advocated for. Trump was just a vehicle for them to try to prop up that agenda, but they will not hesitate if Trump deviates at all from any of the rhetoric that he said over the campaign. Theyre gonna go full tilt. He added, There are stories about how they said theyll help impeach Trump if he goes the other way. https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/08/21/ex-breitbart-official-warns-site-could-back-trump-impeachment/23156356/ why and when and how did the media get powerful enough to get the thirst of blood to believe in themselves so much that they think they have anything to do with the impeachment of a president? Deplorable
North Buffalo Posted August 22, 2017 Author Posted August 22, 2017 Hell, you can't even call them dipshits without them getting all dipshitty. Ok that made me laugh Excellent points. You're really correct, you can't engage a leftist in rational dialogue. . Pot where is that kettle... or there it is!
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Ok that made me laugh . Pot where is that kettle... or there it is! Orly? I find my positions quite rational. 1) Radical Islam (and Islam in general) poses a far greater threat to western democracy than neo-fascism. 2) Antifa and BLM thugs have caused more injuries, fatalities and property damage than neo-fascists in the past 10 years.
North Buffalo Posted August 22, 2017 Author Posted August 22, 2017 Orly? I find my positions quite rational. 1) Radical Islam (and Islam in general) poses a far greater threat to western democracy than neo-fascism. 2) Antifa and BLM thugs have caused more injuries, fatalities and property damage than neo-fascists in the past 10 years. On the 2nd. both are dangerous... generally neo nazi etc thugs are less prevalent except in U. S., where their meth and synth marijuana funding factories and crime syndicates pose a huge threat to US v poppy producing rad islam. On the first, Disagree on Islam in general. They are no different than fundalmental Christians condemning me.. but many are really good people. Arab nationalism is the issue not Islam so I beg to differ on your rationality..,,
Tiberius Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 We need a 25th Amendmentent solution here and now
Coach Tuesday Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 POTUS is mentally deteriorating by the minute. Who cares about socialists (or communists)?
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 POTUS is mentally deteriorating by the minute. Who cares about socialists (or communists)? I'd say it's reasonable to care about individuals espousing a broken ideology accounting for well over 100 million deaths over the course of the last century; and even more reasonable to care about violent militant Communist agitators assaulting people and destroying property. You don't think that's reasonable?
row_33 Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 Has he resigned yet? I thought it was guaranteed to happen by last Monday.
Doc Brown Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 I didn't see the speech but heard CNN went nuts over it so I just watched their reaction on youtube. They obviously have a deep hatred for the guy and it seemed they were just responding on emotion saying he was mentally unstable, 25th amendment, etc.. He's not and you idiots play right into Trump's hands. When are they going to get that they continue to feed the troll that he is he's only going to get bigger?
GG Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 I didn't see the speech but heard CNN went nuts over it so I just watched their reaction on youtube. They obviously have a deep hatred for the guy and it seemed they were just responding on emotion saying he was mentally unstable, 25th amendment, etc.. He's not and you idiots play right into Trump's hands. When are they going to get that they continue to feed the troll that he is he's only going to get bigger? Because it's CNN - FYI subject of yesterday's WSJ piece CNN’s Big Secret BREAKING: Host reveals that journalists don’t like Trump.
Tiberius Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 I didn't see the speech but heard CNN went nuts over it so I just watched their reaction on youtube. They obviously have a deep hatred for the guy and it seemed they were just responding on emotion saying he was mentally unstable, 25th amendment, etc.. He's not and you idiots play right into Trump's hands. When are they going to get that they continue to feed the troll that he is he's only going to get bigger? Just stop covering the President? Or Trump will get bigger? The number of viewers was way down, I'd say he's the one that losing it.
Deranged Rhino Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 I didn't see the speech but heard CNN went nuts over it so I just watched their reaction on youtube. They obviously have a deep hatred for the guy and it seemed they were just responding on emotion saying he was mentally unstable, 25th amendment, etc.. He's not and you idiots play right into Trump's hands. When are they going to get that they continue to feed the troll that he is he's only going to get bigger? It's hilarious to see the slams against Trump have completely changed from "collusion" to "mentally unstable". The same mouthpieces on the Hill who have been railing against Russia for seven months are suddenly silent on that issue and now talking about mental instability. (looking at you, dishonorable Mr. Schiff). Of course, they had to change tracks once the hacking narrative was blown out of the water and the USIC was shown to have presented falsified evidence to the American people in January of this year. You would think most journalists would race to cover that story since it's the stuff journos dream of... but if they went after that story they'd have to admit their own culpability in the soft coup. Honesty is in short supply, as are principles apparently.
row_33 Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 All Trump's haters have been dead wrong every single time since he announced, must be up to 1,500 declarations they would have wagered their left nut on by now.
Tiberius Posted August 23, 2017 Posted August 23, 2017 It's hilarious to see the slams against Trump have completely changed from "collusion" to "mentally unstable". The same mouthpieces on the Hill who have been railing against Russia for seven months are suddenly silent on that issue and now talking about mental instability. (looking at you, dishonorable Mr. Schiff). Of course, they had to change tracks once the hacking narrative was blown out of the water and the USIC was shown to have presented falsified evidence to the American people in January of this year. You would think most journalists would race to cover that story since it's the stuff journos dream of... but if they went after that story they'd have to admit their own culpability in the soft coup. Honesty is in short supply, as are principles apparently. This is great stuff!
Recommended Posts