JarHeadJim Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Columbus, Ohio peeps March 9 you can enter a competition to try and top the 4.82 forty time posted by Maurice Clarett at the NFL Combine. The prize? An "I Beat Maurice Clarett" T-shirt.
mary owen Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Columbus, Ohio peeps March 9 you can enter a competition to try and top the 4.82 forty time posted by Maurice Clarett at the NFL Combine. The prize? An "I Beat Maurice Clarett" T-shirt. 260426[/snapback] if anyone goes, can they run twice and send me one of the shirts? Please??? and when you do it, run it backwards.
R. Rich Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Most of the members of this board can run a 4.8 in the 40 or better.
mary owen Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Most of the members of this board can run a 4.8 in the 40 or better. 260448[/snapback] and I have a busted ACL, torn MCL, torn miniscus, and cracked knee cap. I could edge him out with a 4.79999999999999
IndyJay1234 Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Columbus, Ohio peeps March 9 you can enter a competition to try and top the 4.82 forty time posted by Maurice Clarett at the NFL Combine. The prize? An "I Beat Maurice Clarett" T-shirt. 260426[/snapback] Watch how few people can actually do that. Yes, for a RB he is slow. For a human being that is not bad.
VABills Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Get some Dortmunder Gold while you are there. Good stuff.
udonkey Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Have any of you people actually run a 40? I'd be willing to bet that there are very few, if any, members of this board that can run a 4.82 40.
R. Rich Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Have any of you people actually run a 40? I'd be willing to bet that there are very few, if any, members of this board that can run a 4.82 40. 260521[/snapback] I readily admit that I wouldn't be anywhere close to a 4.82 in the 40. At the height of my athletic career (which isn't saying much), the best I could do in the 40 was about 4.55. That was over 10 years and 100 lbs ago!
VABills Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 I readily admit that I wouldn't be anywhere close to a 4.82 in the 40. At the height of my athletic career (which isn't saying much), the best I could do in the 40 was about 4.55. That was over 10 years and 100 lbs ago! 260526[/snapback] If someone put a bucket of La Nova wings and a garbage plate at 40 yards I bet you could get there in under 4.5 even today.
R. Rich Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 If someone put a bucket of La Nova wings and a garbage plate at 40 yards I bet you could get there in under 4.5 even today. 260552[/snapback] Doubtful.
Terry Tate Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Have any of you people actually run a 40? I'd be willing to bet that there are very few, if any, members of this board that can run a 4.82 40. 260521[/snapback] Not even close. But I'm still fast enough to catch my wife. Uh, after that, watching the clock is not permitted.
udonkey Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Not even close. But I'm still fast enough to catch my wife. Uh, after that, watching the clock is not permitted. 260563[/snapback] Thats all thats important.
sandt38 Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Not even close. But I'm still fast enough to catch my wife. Uh, after that, watching the clock is not permitted. 260563[/snapback] Ain't been married long, huh?
stevestojan Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Most of the members of this board can run a 4.8 in the 40 or better. 260448[/snapback] I for one will say that I wouldn't come close to 4.8 seconds in the 40. I'd be lucky to not have to stop halfway through from a smoke and a glass of water.
gantrules Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 I have run the 40. In my good years I couldn't go faster than 5.5 and that was darn good. Just realize that it's 35/100's of a second slower than Emmitt Smith ran at his combine.
justnzane Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 I readily admit that I wouldn't be anywhere close to a 4.82 in the 40. At the height of my athletic career (which isn't saying much), the best I could do in the 40 was about 4.55. That was over 10 years and 100 lbs ago! 260526[/snapback] Rich i agree... as a D3 hurdler/sprinter (400m/500m) i prolly run about a 4.5-4.6. Most people on this board would be lucky to break 5.25 which is about average for an Olineman.
R. Rich Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 Rich i agree... as a D3 hurdler/sprinter (400m/500m) i prolly run about a 4.5-4.6. Most people on this board would be lucky to break 5.25 which is about average for an Olineman. 260913[/snapback] Probably so. Hurdles, huh? Nice. I did the 110s and 300s (PA has 300s, not 400s) in high school and the 110s in college.
Campy Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 I for one will say that I wouldn't come close to 4.8 seconds in the 40. I'd be lucky to not have to stop halfway through from a smoke and a glass of water. 260741[/snapback] Now that's funny!
sidbuff Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 DUDE THAT IS HILARIOUSLY FUNNY I LOST 20LBS I CAN DEF BEAT THAT TIME. OH I WOULD JUST LUV ONE OF THOSE SHIRTSSS I WOULD WEAR IT AT MY ANUUAL DRAFT PARTY....
R. Rich Posted March 3, 2005 Posted March 3, 2005 DUDE THAT IS HILARIOUSLY FUNNY I LOST 20LBS I CAN DEF BEAT THAT TIME. OH I WOULD JUST LUV ONE OF THOSE SHIRTSSS I WOULD WEAR IT AT MY ANUUAL DRAFT PARTY.... 260944[/snapback] What annual (or is it anuual) draft party?
Recommended Posts