Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

which was miles better than ..............

Tyrod Taylor.

 

There is no break given for a 12 rating!!!!

 

so you're saying bench the starter because of his performance in a preseason game...? He looked fine in week 1.

Edited by dneveu
  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

@MikeCatalana

Some day Nate Peterman might take over #Bills. But 50% passing vs backups should not get a starter benched. Cut Tyrod a break. For now.

 

 

Yes, T.T should absolutely be the starter.

 

Peterman should only come in if T.T absolutely tanks during the year or if he's injured.

Posted

which was miles better than ..............

Tyrod Taylor.

 

There is no break given for a 12 rating!!!!

 

How do you think Peterman would have fared against the Eagles 1st team D under heavy pressure with very little protection from the OL (Henderson at LT and Ducasse at RG)? You need to do a full examination of both situations that each QB faced and reassess with some objectivity instead of just blindly throwing out stats and QB ratings that don't mean a whole lot.

Posted

 

Yes, T.T should absolutely be the starter.

 

Peterman should only come in if T.T absolutely tanks during the year or if he's injured.

 

If we start off like 0-4, 0-6 or something, go for it. Or even if its a 2-3 situation and Tyrod's playing like crap. You can have the hook ready, but you have to be able to truly justify it.

Posted (edited)

 

so you're saying bench the starter because of his performance in a preseason game...? He looked fine in week 1.

who looked fine in week 1? Taylor? not quite, oh wait lets blame penalties.

 

Taylor should be looking good and playing confident. He's not. He downright sucked last night with a 12 rating.!!!

 

God almighty if EJ had a 12 rating fans would have hired a moving truck and had it parked outside his home!!!!

 

How do you think Peterman would have fared against the Eagles 1st team D under heavy pressure with very little protection from the OL (Henderson at LT and Ducasse at RG)? You need to do a full examination of both situations that each QB faced and reassess with some objectivity instead of just blindly throwing out stats and QB ratings that don't mean a whole lot.

12 Rat

 

/argument

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
Posted (edited)

who looked fine in week 1? Taylor? not quite, oh wait lets blame penalties.

 

Taylor should be looking good and playing confident. He's not. He downright sucked last night with a 12 rating.!!!

 

God almighty if EJ had a 12 rating fans would have hired a moving truck and had it parked outside his home!!!!

12 Rat

 

/argument

 

You must be JM2009's brother because you're behaving in the same manner that you accuse him of.

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted

who looked fine in week 1? Taylor? not quite, oh wait lets blame penalties.

 

Taylor should be looking good and playing confident. He's not. He downright sucked last night with a 12 rating.!!!

 

God almighty if EJ had a 12 rating fans would have hired a moving truck and had it parked outside his home!!!!

12 Rat

 

/argument

 

It's a game that doesn't matter.... need to slow your role.

Posted

He certainly made some nice throws last night. The one over the middle (forgot who caught it) think it was O'Leary, put it where only he could catch it. Slipped it right by the defenders hands. And the other 1 (think it was Zay Jones) who caught it at the sideline. Back shoulder pass where only he could catch.

 

Kid is looking sharp so far and showing he has good accuracy.

Posted

Eventually we are going to get lucky and one of the guys we have, is going to be good. Who knows? It could be Nate. He certainly seems to be a gamer. Also seems to grasp the concept of the quick decisive passing game. Horses for corses...some guys just fit systems better then others

Nate Peterman is not a plan.

 

A 5th Rounder was not someone the NFL thought highly of, and 5th Rounders don't usually pan out.

once you get in the league, you either can play, or you can't. Doesn't matter how you got there. It matters what you do when you get there
Posted (edited)

Nate Peterman is not a plan.

 

A 5th Rounder was not someone the NFL thought highly of, and 5th Rounders don't usually pan out.

That may be true

 

what was the round Tyrod was drafted again. O forget.

 

 

 

Nothing is a guarantee.

 

I've yet to see some one post that Nate is the answer.

 

The discussion has been --- people are liking what they have seen.

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
Posted

Nate Peterman is not a plan.

 

A 5th Rounder was not someone the NFL thought highly of, and 5th Rounders don't usually pan out.

With this logic, we should bring back EJ.

 

After all, he was drafted in the first...

Posted

If McDermott wants to see how Peterman would perform behind our poor O-line, there's no need to wait until next Saturday. Just have him take snaps on the I-90 during rush hour.

Posted

With this logic, we should bring back EJ.

 

After all, he was drafted in the first...

Johnny Manzel

Mark Sanchez

Blane Gabbert

Jamarcus Russell

 

All these guys must be better then those teams thought. Who cares what they did in the NFL, all that matters is where you are drafted I guess

Posted

 

The new backup QB is always the most popular guy on the team. What's Jeff Tuel doing these days?

I realize Peterman was playing with 2nd teamers, but the guy doesn't seem the least bit intimidated and by just watching him it would be hard to tell we are looking at a rookie in my humble opinion.

×
×
  • Create New...