McBean Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I freaking love McBean. We finally have people with a brain running this organization. This is ALL for Darnold or Allen next year imo. Ian Rapoport @RapSheet With the trades, the #Bills have: 2 2018 first rounders, 2 2018 second rounders, 2 2018 third rounders. Thats not a bad way to build.
Bronc24 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 (edited) I agree. Setting up for post Brady. I get the want to win now...I want it as well...but finally, after two decades, there is a vision and plan. Edited August 11, 2017 by Bronc24
snafu Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I freaking love McBean. We finally have people with a brain running this organization. This is ALL for Darnold or Allen next year imo. Ian Rapoport @RapSheet With the trades, the #Bills have: 2 2018 first rounders, 2 2018 second rounders, 2 2018 third rounders. Thats not a bad way to build. Build like the Cleveland Browns build? Tank like the New York Jets tank? Sorry -- can't agree with you.
CountryCletus Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I freaking love McBean. We finally have people with a brain running this organization. This is ALL for Darnold or Allen next year imo. Ian Rapoport @RapSheet With the trades, the #Bills have: 2 2018 first rounders, 2 2018 second rounders, 2 2018 third rounders. Thats not a bad way to build. And we could add another 3rd by simply cutting some FA's we signed
BigdaddyinOrlando Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Like the pro active moves. Most definitely one vision and it's refreshing
row_33 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Build like the Cleveland Browns build? Tank like the New York Jets tank? Sorry -- can't agree with you. Can't beat them at maximizing losses. Gotta be 3 other teams as well.
Juice_32 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I agree. Setting up for post Brady. I get the want to win now...I want it as well...but finally, after two decades, there is a vision and plan. I think this has more to do with it than most realize.
Spiderweb Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 McBean ... More ego maniacs Time will tell if they really have a clue Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
McBean Posted August 11, 2017 Author Posted August 11, 2017 Build like the Cleveland Browns build? Tank like the New York Jets tank? Sorry -- can't agree with you. We got a WR that has better numbers than Watkins. This scheme fits Gaines. O, and we are loaded with picks! Watkins and Darby would've walked out because they weren't resigning here.
jrober38 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Having picks means nothing if they're not used correctly. It's nice to have all those picks, but we need to use them on quality franchise building players (something we've failed miserably in acquiring for the past 5+ years).
Offside Number 76 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I think this has more to do with it than most realize. It's a fair point, that's for sure.
Golden*Wheels Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 How are the Jets set up for picks for next year? Seems like some team at the top of next year's draft is gonna get a damn boatload of picks if they want them....
r00tabaga Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 And we could add another 3rd by simply cutting some FA's we signed Have until week 10...no rush
4_kidd_4 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 This is fantastic stuff fot sure. Just let it happen...
McBean Posted August 11, 2017 Author Posted August 11, 2017 Having picks means nothing if they're not used correctly. It's nice to have all those picks, but we need to use them on quality franchise building players (something we've failed miserably in acquiring for the past 5+ years). I agree. However, Matthews has better numbers than Watkins and Gaines perfectly fits this scheme. Again, Watkins and Darby weren't signing here.
LEBills Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 And we could add another 3rd by simply cutting some FA's we signed Really good point. I'm not sure if the Bills are going full on tank because I think they didn't like Sammy or Darby for the O and D. If they cut enough FAs to recoup that 3rd and 4th round compensatory, or trade McCoy/Tyrod/Dareus then the tank will be full on.
mjt328 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 So if the Bills weren't going to pay Sammy Watkins next year, what makes you think they are going to pay Jordan Matthews? And even with all the "ammunition" in the world, don't forget: - The Jets have one of the worst rosters in 20 years - The Browns also have tons of draft picks and need a QB - There is no guarantee all the top guys will be coming out of school next year
Bronc24 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Having picks means nothing if they're not used correctly. It's nice to have all those picks, but we need to use them on quality franchise building players (something we've failed miserably in acquiring for the past 5+ years). We just hired a competent GM. The past 5 (or 17) years aren't on his watch.
Recommended Posts