707BillsFan Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 It's not like Sammy played for us anyway. He's missed 13 games over the last couple of years (and had nagging injuries in many he played which limited him). Matthews, hopefully, will at least be on the field. He's been fairly productive too. Darby? I won't miss him. Did the Bills send fire extinguishers to Philly, because he will continue to get burned there too. I think Gaines is guy who will fit our D scheme better. I'm good w/ all this...plus draft picks!
Bangarang Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Beane press conference 4 PM est, not sure why my thread was deleted. That should be interesting to hear his comments. I'm sure he will give us a lot of cliche and generic answers though
stevewin Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Thank you. Sounds OK to me, although it'd be nice to have a deep threat too. That's the best part of TT's passing game. Maybe they'll make a blockbuster trade for Goodwin next
thebandit27 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 It's not like Sammy played for us anyway. He's missed 13 games over the last couple of years (and had nagging injuries in many he played which limited him). Matthews, hopefully, will at least be on the field. He's been fairly productive too. Darby? I won't miss him. Did the Bills send fire extinguishers to Philly, because he will continue to get burned there too. I think Gaines is guy who will fit our D scheme better. I'm good w/ all this...plus draft picks! Not like he played because he missed 13 of 48 games--does that not mean that he played in 35 of 48 games? Which is more--13 or 35?
RyanC883 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Do we look to extend him right now then? Same thing with Gaines? We already decided not to extend Watkins. So lets see what he does in this system. The system appears to be predicated on less huge yardage plays and more air and ground ball control. More Pats***, less Saints type system. Bolden and Matthews and Zay is a great lineup, and they generally stay healthy.
LABILLBACKER Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I'm sitting in my car in shocked utter disbelief. We get a corner and a second rounder
HappyDays Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 For what it's worth Greg Gabriel likes both moves.
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Who would you rather have? Woods - Goodwin - Hunter - Powell or Jones - Boldin - Matthews - Holmes/Streater/Brown
LABILLBACKER Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Good to see the Bills are still run by idiots.
DisplacedBillsFan Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 That's easy: I was really happy when they actually targeted him in the passing game (i.e. the final 9 games of 2015) and he was the most productive WR in the NFL during that time. If you want to say that he wasn't a fit here because they don't throw the ball enough, fine, I can at least accept that line of logic as being somewhat salient. To say that he hasn't produced when given his opportunities is patently false. 9 games? So the other 39 games of his tenure when he wasn't on the field at all, or wasn't producing at all, were the fault of someone else or the play calling I bet? I ask you for a season you were happy with him and you pick out half a season. Mike Williams also had a ton of potential. Do you wish the Bills were still paying him and waiting for him to get it together? Trent Edwards had a few good games, should he be given a shot to be our QB?
Juice_32 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Can someone that's watched Gaines explain why a short-armed, small-bodied CB is a good fit? I really hope it's not just because he can tackle. IF healthy, there will not be a drop-off between him and Darby in a zone scheme. Read this... http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2264750-rams-cornerback-ej-gaines-proving-to-be-one-of-2014-nfl-drafts-early-steals
Zyg13 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 He isn't easily fracturable either. I guess my sarcasm was not clear enough...
thebandit27 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 9 games? So the other 39 games of his tenure when he wasn't on the field at all, or wasn't producing at all, were the fault of someone else or the play calling I bet? I ask you for a season you were happy with him and you pick out half a season. Mike Williams also had a ton of potential. Do you wish the Bills were still paying him and waiting for him to get it together? Trent Edwards had a few good games, should he be given a shot to be our QB? That you're confused is a result of lack of consideration of context. He can't produce if they don't throw the ball to him. As I said, and maintain: If you want to say that he wasn't a fit here because they don't throw the ball enough, fine, I can at least accept that line of logic as being somewhat salient. To say that he hasn't produced when given his opportunities is patently false.
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Stop dude. McDermott knows more then you. Just like Rex did right!
RyanC883 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 For the systems we run Gaines and Matthews are good fits. I'd imagine the difference in production (if there is any) is minimal compared to Sammy and Darby. Throw in the value of the picks and I don't understand why anyone is upset. well put!
Zyg13 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 All in all these two trades are some of the worst moves in the drought.
Juice_32 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 All in all these two trades are some of the worst moves in the drought. why?
NoSaint Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 This feels like Josh McDaniels first job all over again. He came in as the smartest guy in the room. He had to fail before he succeeded. We have McDaniels all over. That's been my worry since it became clear that we were giving him so much control. Could be great but could just as easily take years to recover from. Hope for the best I guess!
Big C Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 That's been my worry since it became clear that we were giving him so much control. Could be great but could just as easily take years to recover from. Hope for the best I guess! Think we had too many cooks in the kitchen, so to speak, over the past few regimes. I like that this new one has a unified vision. Could go badly, but could just as easily go well.
DisplacedBillsFan Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 That you're confused is a result of lack of consideration of context. He can't produce if they don't throw the ball to him. As I said, and maintain: If you want to say that he wasn't a fit here because they don't throw the ball enough, fine, I can at least accept that line of logic as being somewhat salient. To say that he hasn't produced when given his opportunities is patently false. Did he make the most of his opportunities? Elite receivers in the NFL have catch rates in the mid to high 70% range while good receivers, like the ones you would pick for your fantasy team most likely, are well into the 60% range. Sammy barely snuck into the 60s in 2015, he barely broke into the 50% range his other two years.
Recommended Posts