yungmack Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 There's already a thread with this EXACT topic, that's the point. It was even like THREE threads down! Though I know, you had to start your own because the other doesn't have your name in the title...By your logic, there is no need for all those reports from all those newspapers. Once Sal or Vic files, the rest of the guys should just go cover a local Kiwanis meeting. Me, I like multiple reports and in this one, I learned something I was wondering about and hadn't seen addressed any where else: the mechanics of getting the play calls in quickly. So thanks, Maj.
iinii Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Thanks Major! I am not going to bother reading the other one, you seem to have taken care of it. Thanks
Chandler#81 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 yeeesh.. Nice report, Maj. Thanks. Too harsh on Ragland.
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Just call it the... the great the poor and the appalling
Gunsgoodtime Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Bobby your analysis is spot on with mine, it was exactly what I saw
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 yeeesh.. Nice report, Maj. Thanks. Too harsh on Ragland. I dunno - I'm waiting for him to not look tenative. Hes going to have to get faster at processing.
CommonCents Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I haven't seen it yet, am I safe to put Ragland on my resume? CouchScout.net/sponsoredbyCorona
klos63 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 He would. But would the Bills want him here? they should if he will make the team better.
Dr. Who Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Thanks for the analysis. I haven't seen the game yet, but I trust the judgment of OP.
KellyToughII Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Kaep would be an instant upgrade. They bring that clown in, I stop being a fan.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 they should if he will make the team better. He doesn't make the team any better unless something happens to Tyrod. May as well wait and see if that happens before inviting the circus to town.
HappyDays Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 This is good analysis Bobby, I agree with all of it. It's nuts that we ever changed to a 3-4. But it's funny one of our top draft picks (Shaq) actually fits the 4-3 better, even though Ragland looks like a lost cause in this defense.
John from Riverside Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 I pretty much saw it the same way.....I would like to have seen Zay Jones targeted more
Maury Ballstein Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 they should if he will make the team better. A guy whose 11-24 the last 3 years can't help.
dpberr Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Ragland and Henderson aren't in "playing" shape. You need camp and real playing time to do that. It's why Shaq Lawson looks completely different from how he looked last year. I'd be patient with both men. They will improve with more playing time.
nucci Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 A guy whose 11-24 the last 3 years can't help. But Yates can?
klos63 Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 A guy whose 11-24 the last 3 years can't help. If he's a better player than what we have now, yes he can.
nucci Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 They bring that clown in, I stop being a fan. what if they brought Jenkins in? http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/08/11/malcolm-jenkins-continues-his-own-anthem-protest/
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 But Yates can? He doesn't bring a whirlwind of distraction. I'd rather have RG3... If he's a better player than what we have now, yes he can. The media circus that he brings is worse for literally everyone else on the team though.
Recommended Posts