Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I started the thread in March that the Bills were making a big mistake losing out on 3rd and 4th round comp. picks for the departures of Gilmore and Woods by signing too many C-level FA's. It started a firestorm of reactions from those that agreed to those that thought comp. picks are totally overrated.

 

I was happy to see Matthew Fairburn & Joe Buscaglia both bring it up this week. Fairburn actually directly asked Beane about it in his last presser, and Beane was well aware of it.

 

I actually had a ? about how we can recoup that 3rd round pick though. I understand we need to cut 3 of the qualifying FA additions, the most likely being Ryan Davis, Andre Holmes and Vlad Ducasse. I see Micah Hyde, Steven Hauschka, Jordan Poyer & Patrick Dimarco as near locks, in that order.

 

My ? is when do they need to be cut, to not count as FA additions? Is it before week 1, or is it before week 10? For some reason I thought they can play a certain amount of games before qualifying as an addition? Can someone please let me/us know.

Edited by Estro
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

it won't happen but it's a nice thought

I don't know. If I told you that you could have Streater, street FA DE, PS 4th interior OL (Mudge) and a 3rd round pick or Davis, Holmes and Ducasse for the last 6 weeks of the year what would you pick?

 

I think that the Bills would deal those 3 for a 3rd round pick yesterday. The problem will be if it goes beyond those 3. That's when they may decide to retain them.

Posted

I don't know. If I told you that you could have Streater, street FA DE, PS 4th interior OL (Mudge) and a 3rd round pick or Davis, Holmes and Ducasse for the last 6 weeks of the year what would you pick?

 

I think that the Bills would deal those 3 for a 3rd round pick yesterday. The problem will be if it goes beyond those 3. That's when they may decide to retain them.

they love Ducasse and Holmes is still a starter according to the depth chart. they are going to field the best team they can and they think those 2 will see significant playing time

Posted

they love Ducasse and Holmes is still a starter according to the depth chart. they are going to field the best team they can and they think those 2 will see significant playing time

Ducasse is still their 5th interior OL, and Holmes could be as low as the 5th WR by the end of the week. They have 10 weeks of the regular season as well. It's absolutely on the table.
Posted

I don't know the exact formula off-hand, but there is a playing time component (non special teams based snaps). There is a chance that Ducasse may not count if the o-line stays healthy. There is also a chance that Justin Hunter may count as a loss if he plays enough snaps for the Steelers.

Posted (edited)

Week 10, but this assumes that the other guys that were signed away from the Bills remain on rosters too. It's fluid

So if it is week 10, this gives me hope Beane will find a way to recoup the 3rd rounder. If it looks like we are out of the running for a playoff push after week 9 (say 4-5) it will be a lot easier for Beane to make the wise decision & acquire the 3rd rd. comp. pick by cutting a few backups.

Edited by Estro
Posted

I don't know the exact formula off-hand, but there is a playing time component (non special teams based snaps). There is a chance that Ducasse may not count if the o-line stays healthy. There is also a chance that Justin Hunter may count as a loss if he plays enough snaps for the Steelers.

That's interesting and Hunter sounds like he will play quite a bit.

So if it is week 10, as I though it my be too, this gives me hope Beane will find a way to recoup the 3rd rounder. If it looks like we are out of the running for a playoff push after week 9 (say 4-5) it will be a lot easier for Beane to make the wise decision & acquire the 3rd rd. comp. pick by cutting a few backups.

Even if we are in the mix (assuming relative health) will anyone be upset if Holmes and Ducasse are replaced by Mudge and Streater?
Posted

it won't happen but it's a nice thought

 

If the Bills are not in contention come week 10 then the option is definitely on the table no point in holding onto to these guys if the playoffs are a long shot.

Posted

Another thing to keep in mind is that most of these projections are based on the website 'Over The Cap's' cutoff for qualification of 961 which is subject to change (both in terms of the actual cutoff number and players moving up and down the list due to snap count adjustments). Players for the Bills within 100 spots of their cutoff.

 

In: Ducasse (872), Davis (899), Johnson (1040)

Out: Blanton (1042), Hunter (1057)

 

I can imagine a scenario where Ducasse slips far enough down to no longer qualify and Hunter is one of the players that replaces him, which would shift the Bills from 5/7 to 6/6.

Posted

Another thing to keep in mind is that most of these projections are based on the website 'Over The Cap's' cutoff for qualification of 961 which is subject to change (both in terms of the actual cutoff number and players moving up and down the list due to snap count adjustments). Players for the Bills within 100 spots of their cutoff.

 

In: Ducasse (872), Davis (899), Johnson (1040)

Out: Blanton (1042), Hunter (1057)

 

I can imagine a scenario where Ducasse slips far enough down to no longer qualify and Hunter is one of the players that replaces him, which would shift the Bills from 5/7 to 6/6.

Johnson can move up too. He's been working in the slot.
Posted

That's interesting and Hunter sounds like he will play quite a bit.

Even if we are in the mix (assuming relative health) will anyone be upset if Holmes and Ducasse are replaced by Mudge and Streater?

I'm rooting for Holmes to make the team and be an effective WR for us. I'm not against Streater or any of the other WR's making a case for themselves either. I know Holmes' camp has been underwhelming, but it sounds like he has rebounded. Let's see how he does during the preseason games.

 

As for Ducasse, I'm not that thrilled with him. He is a veteran player, and probably a good back-up, but if Jordan Mudge can show that he should be on the roster, then go for it. Having younger players on the O-Line is a good thing for us.

Posted

I don't know the exact formula off-hand, but there is a playing time component (non special teams based snaps). There is a chance that Ducasse may not count if the o-line stays healthy. There is also a chance that Justin Hunter may count as a loss if he plays enough snaps for the Steelers.

 

The formula is Pats = picks, Bills = no picks.

Posted

The formula is Pats = picks, Bills = no picks.

Pats front office = head of the class, Bills front office = "cue Benny Hill music"

 

Ducasse is still their 5th interior OL, and Holmes could be as low as the 5th WR by the end of the week. They have 10 weeks of the regular season as well. It's absolutely on the table.

You're absolutely correct that it's still on the table, maybe the Benny Hill music finally stops.

Posted

I've never been able to keep up with all the ins and outs of the Cap, Free Agency rules, etc. and frankly I stopped trying to along time ago. Experience has taught me that NOBODY knows how any of these guys are going to play, how long they're going to last, or when they'll be suspended or even convicted.

 

Now I just watch the games and leave the Front Office mess to the guys who are paid big bucks to mess it up!

Posted

That's interesting and Hunter sounds like he will play quite a bit.

Even if we are in the mix (assuming relative health) will anyone be upset if Holmes and Ducasse are replaced by Mudge and Streater?

 

I would also be in favor of pursuing a wink-nod agreement to release and re-sign Ryan Davis after week 1 if it meant gaining the 3rd round comp pick.

 

As for Holmes and Ducasse, well, I didn't want either in the first place, so please, by all means, bring on Streater and Mudge/Ola/etc

Posted

Lets hope they field the best possible 53 and let the chips(comp draft picks) fall where they may.

 

Playing a strategy like that might work if your bottoming out like Cleveland.

×
×
  • Create New...