Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He did say or.

 

Coach killers are the coaches too stubborn to move away from a QB that just doesn't get it.

 

Not what a coach killer means. Making up new stuff. Go for it. If only they'd listen to you so they could save themselves. :rolleyes:

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

You know what, after watching the Titans/Panthers, Broncos and who ever they played, then the Rams/Raiders, Tyrod isn't going to be the starting QB for very long. Those other guys were slinging it all over the field making all the throws, looking the part. Tyrod, nope, looking terrible like usual, can't read a defense pre snap, can't scan the field, late on throws, no pocket presence, etc the list goes on and on. As of right now the only 2 things he does better than Peterman is the long ball and scramble. The coaches are just giving him enough rope and it's just a matter of time. These coaches know what good QBing looks like and they know it isn't coming from Tyrod any time soon.

Peterman will be starting sooner than later regardless of how many lame excuses the Tyrod crowd can come up with. Bye bye Tyrod, good guy, good teammate, excellent athlete, absolutely horrible QB.

 

I love this post....

Posted

Is this supposed to be a bad thing or something? Who cares how a QB got good numbers? Isn't having good numbers what matters?

Do numbers count for more if the offense is hard?

 

Give me to 10th In points with a simple offense and a D that knows how many men are supposed to get in the field.

Posted

Do numbers count for more if the offense is hard?

 

Give me to 10th In points with a simple offense and a D that knows how many men are supposed to get in the field.

Point being, if a QB does well does it matter it came against a bad team or in an offense that was supposedly simplified for him?

Posted

For what it is worth the 2nd pick really doesn't worry me. We have seen TT do that a few times before... a couple picked a couple went for BIG plays. As long as you get it deep and your receiver competes for the ball it is as good as a punt in many cases.

Agreed.

Posted

Point being, if a QB does well does it matter it came against a bad team or in an offense that was supposedly simplified for him?

So now we're throwing playing against bad teams into the equation?

 

There are no style points in football. Points are good no matter how you get them. Just win.

Posted

OK, so the takeaway here is that we should just care about stats and don't worry about wins. What marsha does contributes directly to wins. What taylor does, not so much. When the patsies need extra from brady, he delivers. Taylor can't do that. Teams win games not individuals but we need a QB who can put the team on his back and carry it for a series or a quarter or a half when the need arises. Don't know if the rook has it in him, last years Pitt-Clemson game suggests he might, we'll know a little more tonight. I for one, can't wait to find out.

I agree. His stats are average at a very best but he cannot lead his team to victory with his stats.Last month you mentioned the comparison to Brees and Rivers??? They threw for over 4000 yards which is hard to do. In this league. They have been doing it for decades. (Without a running game) Therefore, you can actually say, well it is not the QB. Now TT as a passer has only one game with over 300 yards. With a reliable TE,Rb, and receiver ( Woods). So what are you saying? He would miss wide open short passes on 3 Rd and 1. Filling his at average at best stats in garbage time or with sorry teams. Plus he looks awfull now and in OTAs and you are still defending him. Buy the way he is not getting 4000 yard passing.
Posted

You know what, after watching the Titans/Panthers, Broncos and who ever they played, then the Rams/Raiders, Tyrod isn't going to be the starting QB for very long. Those other guys were slinging it all over the field making all the throws, looking the part. Tyrod, nope, looking terrible like usual, can't read a defense pre snap, can't scan the field, late on throws, no pocket presence, etc the list goes on and on. As of right now the only 2 things he does better than Peterman is the long ball and scramble. The coaches are just giving him enough rope and it's just a matter of time. These coaches know what good QBing looks like and they know it isn't coming from Tyrod any time soon.

Peterman will be starting sooner than later regardless of how many lame excuses the Tyrod crowd can come up with. Bye bye Tyrod, good guy, good teammate, excellent athlete, absolutely horrible QB.

Hot takes galore right here!!!

Posted (edited)

One more year. One more year I have to watch a RB playing QB. Just one more year

I think it was actually somewhere in this thread that someone made a comment that there isn't anyone who is actually saying that Taylor is just a "RB playing QB."

 

Whoever that poster was, here is yet another example :doh:

No No No. Quit putting things in a perfect situations. He needs to adapt he is not a rookie. He was in this offense for 4 years. They gave him two seasons as the starter. There is no excuse for not hitting short passes with easy throws. No excuses, he needs to perform. His stats are decent at best. At a very best. All that off season making head lines to play like that. Look at all the rest of the young QB. Not to mention Dak. Last year's excuse no D. This year the o line. What's next? The coaches messed up now they have to stick with the hot Potato. I said it during OTAs. He was not gonna progress in this offense. He can not passss.

Cardale Jones Cardale Jones Cardale Jones :nana:

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Posted

Is this supposed to be a bad thing or something? Who cares how a QB got good numbers? Isn't having good numbers what matters?

It's good and bad.

 

The good is he's doing well for what's being asked of him, but the bad is that the passing offense is limited and when passing becomes vital like late in close games, he struggles mightily.

Posted (edited)

 

No. Jeff George and Jay Cutler were/are coach killer QBs. Great talents with questionable attitudes with a penchant for bad decisions resulting in turnovers. Tyrod is nothing like what I know as a coach killer. His limitations are well known and he has a great team attitude with a low propensity for turning the ball over.

No not a coach killer. But a coach, and the whole front office killer to say the least. That is why Woods left. Which buy the way Sammy and Woods are very happy they left and will do a lot better with Goff. I was there in LA. The people like family members were there and said They both felt it was TT poor play holding them back. They were clowning and it was funny. Edited by Noogie75
Posted

So now we're throwing playing against bad teams into the equation?

 

There are no style points in football. Points are good no matter how you get them. Just win.

Are you even aware of the point I responding to in the first place?

Posted (edited)

No not a coach killer. But a coach, and the whole front office killer to say the least. That is why Woods left. Which buy the way Sammy and Woods are very happy they left and will do a lot better with Goff.

 

This is just silly. Tyrod and the offense were at least viable and much more effective the last two seasons than the Rex Ryan defense. Woods left to get paid and go back home to LA. Your post is all fabrication that is completely divorced from reality.

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted

I love this post....

 

...hey 'Cane, good to see you bro.....TT exhibits some of the same tendencies that EJ did and no I'm not comparing the two......processing the entire field in <5 seconds, trusting/spotting receivers, reads/progressions versus favorite target lock on, etc come to mind.....his wheels cannot and should not be a continual bail out...EJ had no wheels....Russel Wilson was smart enough to temper the use of his wheels when or IF the timing was right......you can't tell me that Buffalo's passing game is a feared component of this offense among 31 DC's league wide with a straight face.....I CERTAINLY understand that the "other 31" are exempt from receiving corp issues like injuries, trades, cuts, suspensions, etc and it is ONLY a Buffalo thing.....of course...so this is the kid's "make it or break it " year with Dennison as the mentor......keep in mind that a $6 mil roster bonus is due in March.....as the Mizzou gang says ,"show me"..........stay tuned.....

Posted (edited)

Are you even aware of the point I responding to in the first place?

Yes, it shows what your made off. Brees and Rivers ripped the stats on good teams where you can say 300 yards 4 tds in a loosing effort. Therefore, there is no question it can't be them that is wrong. Both teams had weak to sorry offensive lines. Figure Chargers had Gates. With Kenon Allen hurt.( Top receiver) Saints average receivers. But they both still ripped it up in the air. We had Woods and Our TE and what. Excuses Excuses Excuses. Edited by Noogie75
Posted (edited)

Yes, it shows what your made off. Brees and Rivers ripped the stats on good teams where you can say 300 yards 4 tds in a loosing effort. Therefore, there is no question it can't be them that is wrong. [/b[both teams had weak to sorry offensive lines. Figure Chargers had Gates. With Kenon Allen hurt.( Top receiver) Saints average receivers. But they both still ripped it up in the air. We had Woods and Our TE and what. Excuses Excuses Excuses.

Taylor's 2 best career games were against playoff teams.... sooo, there's that. Edited by transplantbillsfan
×
×
  • Create New...