Jump to content

It's Reggie Ragland time!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Im not taking the bait on the name calling....I will simply report and let the mods deal with that issue

 

 

guess there was no issue.

 

soooo, just keep that in mind. you bring this on yourself. i don't seek out to do this, you question me and i answer it and walk back everything you say a month later when you realize i was right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever have joint surgery?

Ligament cartilage or tendon surgery?

When subjecting your body to contact sports with monsters, 100% is never possible once an injury occurs. You can get close, but never 100%.

In fact, I doubt he will be anywhere close to 80% physically and 60% mentally recovered by the start of the season.

No I haven't, but then again, I'm 53 years old and not a football player. Are you a medical doctor? You know the percentage of recovery? Are you a psychiatrist? you know that he will be 60% mentally recovered? I've seen many players come back from injuries and not miss a beat. Neither one of will know until he plays, but not sure where you pull those numbers from.

Edited by klos63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I haven't, but then again, I'm 53 years old and not a football player. Are you a medical doctor? You know the percentage of recovery? Are you a psychiatrist? you know that he will be 60% mentally recovered? I've seen many players come back from injuries and not miss a beat. Neither one of will know until he plays, but not sure where you pull those numbers from.

 

 

 

both he and your posts raised my level of interest on recovery. drag is, he will be at a risk to re injure it and that is likely where the mental game plays a factor with having that risk always in your head, some more so than others? also, every person heals/recovers differently. they use a couple examples in the article who made impressive comebacks from the injury/surgery/rehab.

 

hopefully the young man can/will bounce back and be able to contribute to the defense?

 

http://www.drdavidgeier.com/when-athlete-ready-sports-after-acl-surgery/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be elated if Ragland is our B Spikes of 2014, but playing inside, and stops the run on the first 2 downs, and comes out on passing downs

What's wrong with that?

Its a terrific way to use the rookie in 2017

Who said he has to play every down?

Shag and Adolphus didn't

 

In fact how can folks be so excited about a guy like Hyde

Who in GB (until they suffered injuries) over 4 years was mostly a 3rd down backup depth nickel CB playing mostly just one down

Barely 600 snaps in 2015

And yet so unexcited about Ragland just playing two?

 

I keep reading posts about Hyde being 'special'

How so? What has he actually done as a player to date that was 'special'? lol

Nada, he's a nice piece of needed change in our secondary but he has very little upside

I am far more primed about Ragland's upside, let's dream big

Not to mention Hodges PFF rating vs the run last year was superb, better than Zach's and Lorax, that's EXCITING....

 

jc

Edited by wilcoam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be elated if Ragland is our B Spikes of 2014, but playing inside, and stops the run on the first 2 downs, and comes out on passing downs

What's wrong with that?

Its a terrific way to use the rookie in 2017

Who said he has to play every down?

Shag and Adolphus didn't

 

In fact how can folks be so excited about a guy like Hyde

Who in GB (until they suffered injuries) over 4 years was mostly a 3rd down backup depth nickel CB playing mostly just one down

Barely 600 snaps in 2015

And yet so unexcited about Ragland just playing two?

 

I keep reading posts about Hyde being 'special'

How so? What has he actually done as a player to date that was 'special'? lol

Nada, he's a nice piece of needed change in our secondary but he has very little upside

I am far more primed about Ragland's upside, let's dream big

Not to mention Hodges PFF rating vs the run last year was superb, better than Zach's and Lorax, that's EXCITING....

 

jc

I respect your posts Good Sir. Earned it too.

 

and this one is just as fair and balanced as i might hope we should all consider.

Thanks for contributing here

e

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever have joint surgery?

Ligament cartilage or tendon surgery?

When subjecting your body to contact sports with monsters, 100% is never possible once an injury occurs. You can get close, but never 100%.

In fact, I doubt he will be anywhere close to 80% physically and 60% mentally recovered by the start of the season.

 

Dr. George is back! You were adamant that Lawson wouldn't be ready at all last season and wouldn't see the field.

 

http://www.davidostermd.com/David_M._Oster/ACL_Surgery.html

 

Here's from a surgical ACL specialist.

 

"My choice for a tendon graft in ACL surgery are the hamstring tendons. In the past I exclusively used the central third of the patellar tendon and had great stability results with this however there is some morbidity of harvesting it. Patients frequently have numbness over their kneecap and have about a 25% risk of anterior knee pain. Approximately 10 to 12 years ago I started to use the hamstring tendons. What I noted was the the stability results were similar, however there is a much lower risk of anterior knee pain, numbness, pain after surgery and in the long term the knee feels more normal. I now have approximately 85 patient who have had a patellar tendon in one knee and a hamstring graft in the other, all but 2 if ever had to do it again would use a hamstring tendon.

At the time of surgery an 2 inch incision is made just below the knee on the medial side. Two hamstring tendons are harvested (gracilis and the semi-tendinosis) and the tendons are folded in half making a 4 strand graft. If these tendons are equally tensioned they are approximately 3.5 times stronger than the original ACL. Approximately 70% of the time the hamstrings will grow back (not quite the same) and if knee flexion strength is evaluated at one year the strength on the operated leg is the same as the other leg."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Dr. George is back! You were adamant that Lawson wouldn't be ready at all last season and wouldn't see the field.

 

http://www.davidostermd.com/David_M._Oster/ACL_Surgery.html

 

Here's from a surgical ACL specialist.

 

"My choice for a tendon graft in ACL surgery are the hamstring tendons. In the past I exclusively used the central third of the patellar tendon and had great stability results with this however there is some morbidity of harvesting it. Patients frequently have numbness over their kneecap and have about a 25% risk of anterior knee pain. Approximately 10 to 12 years ago I started to use the hamstring tendons. What I noted was the the stability results were similar, however there is a much lower risk of anterior knee pain, numbness, pain after surgery and in the long term the knee feels more normal. I now have approximately 85 patient who have had a patellar tendon in one knee and a hamstring graft in the other, all but 2 if ever had to do it again would use a hamstring tendon.

At the time of surgery an 2 inch incision is made just below the knee on the medial side. Two hamstring tendons are harvested (gracilis and the semi-tendinosis) and the tendons are folded in half making a 4 strand graft. If these tendons are equally tensioned they are approximately 3.5 times stronger than the original ACL. Approximately 70% of the time the hamstrings will grow back (not quite the same) and if knee flexion strength is evaluated at one year the strength on the operated leg is the same as the other leg."

As my son went through this injury his senior year of football (thereby killing his scholarship offer and sending him on a different path)

 

Same position

 

The modern day medicine with acl repair nowadays really does make it possible for the acl to be redone in a way where it is even stronger

 

the PROBLEM is all of the things that happen to go along with a acl repair......in my son's case he also tore his meniscous.....then he had to go back in and have it scoped because the meniscous re tore......

 

Now......he did some things that he should not have done in his rehab back that caused issues.....it is sometimes difficult to take the competitor out of the athlete and mistakes were made.

 

Reggie tore it before the season even started....he has had the entire year and had the surgery almost immediately.....it looks like they have been very cautious with it. i just hope that he does not need follow up surgerys that are not related to the ACL itself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As my son went through this injury his senior year of football (thereby killing his scholarship offer and sending him on a different path)

 

Same position

 

The modern day medicine with acl repair nowadays really does make it possible for the acl to be redone in a way where it is even stronger

 

the PROBLEM is all of the things that happen to go along with a acl repair......in my son's case he also tore his meniscous.....then he had to go back in and have it scoped because the meniscous re tore......

 

Now......he did some things that he should not have done in his rehab back that caused issues.....it is sometimes difficult to take the competitor out of the athlete and mistakes were made.

 

Reggie tore it before the season even started....he has had the entire year and had the surgery almost immediately.....it looks like they have been very cautious with it. i just hope that he does not need follow up surgerys that are not related to the ACL itself

 

That's tough. If he just tore his ACL...he would have been completely fine. Meniscus changes the game.

No I haven't, but then again, I'm 53 years old and not a football player. Are you a medical doctor? You know the percentage of recovery? Are you a psychiatrist? you know that he will be 60% mentally recovered? I've seen many players come back from injuries and not miss a beat. Neither one of will know until he plays, but not sure where you pull those numbers from.

 

I can answer the bolded. George really believes he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doctor talk reminds me of an old joke that can be modified to fit the Ragland discussion:

 

RR: Doc, when my ACL heals will I be able to play 2017 NFL LB?

 

Doc: I don't see why not.

 

RR: Awesome because before the surgery I was a throwback who only fit in college and circa 1978 NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Dr. George is back! You were adamant that Lawson wouldn't be ready at all last season and wouldn't see the field.

 

http://www.davidostermd.com/David_M._Oster/ACL_Surgery.html

 

Here's from a surgical ACL specialist.

 

"My choice for a tendon graft in ACL surgery are the hamstring tendons. In the past I exclusively used the central third of the patellar tendon and had great stability results with this however there is some morbidity of harvesting it. Patients frequently have numbness over their kneecap and have about a 25% risk of anterior knee pain. Approximately 10 to 12 years ago I started to use the hamstring tendons. What I noted was the the stability results were similar, however there is a much lower risk of anterior knee pain, numbness, pain after surgery and in the long term the knee feels more normal. I now have approximately 85 patient who have had a patellar tendon in one knee and a hamstring graft in the other, all but 2 if ever had to do it again would use a hamstring tendon.

At the time of surgery an 2 inch incision is made just below the knee on the medial side. Two hamstring tendons are harvested (gracilis and the semi-tendinosis) and the tendons are folded in half making a 4 strand graft. If these tendons are equally tensioned they are approximately 3.5 times stronger than the original ACL. Approximately 70% of the time the hamstrings will grow back (not quite the same) and if knee flexion strength is evaluated at one year the strength on the operated leg is the same as the other leg."

most of us realize george c has no god damn idea what he's talking about most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doctor talk reminds me of an old joke that can be modified to fit the Ragland discussion:

 

RR: Doc, when my ACL heals will I be able to play 2017 NFL LB?

 

Doc: I don't see why not.

 

RR: Awesome because before the surgery I was a throwback who only fit in college and circa 1978 NFL.

 

This is the worst joke ever told on the internet.

most of us realize george c has no god damn idea what he's talking about most of the time.

 

I remember when he also adamant that Jerry Hughes was a goner....he wouldn't sign an extension with the Bills a few years ago.

He mocked me for being clueless because I didn't see the writing on the wall.

 

I miss Jerry Hughes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is the worst joke ever told on the internet.

 

I remember when he also adamant that Jerry Hughes was a goner....he wouldn't sign an extension with the Bills a few years ago.

He mocked me for being clueless because I didn't see the writing on the wall.

 

I miss Jerry Hughes.

when talking to him, you'd think he was a snotty teenager. the guy is in his 50s or 60s. not a good look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I injured my shoulder building a fire pit this weekend.

I consulted with Dr. George and he let me know it would never heal. Told me I would be in a sling for the next 136 months.

did he give you anything to rub on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not clear as a bell that Rex is the one who desired Ragland and Whaley may or may not have agreed?

 

Rex's track record tells us what to expect. Anything out of Ragland is a bonus.

I think it probably was Rex that wanted Ragland, but ultimately Whaley had final say. Many GMs have failed because they listened to coaches instead of going with the players they preferred. Phil Savage talked about that exact situation as the one bit of advice he'd give to every new GM. That's what led to him choosing Wimbley over Ngata. He now knows the mistake was ultimately his own fault. The same goes for Whaley.

 

As for Ragland, I do expect some production from him in base and big sets. Again, just because a player is taken earlier than he should have been doesn't mean he doesn't hold some value.

Edited by BarleyNY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

most of us realize george c has no god damn idea what he's talking about most of the time.

Teef, so sad to see that you still live to argue with everyone and everything. It's a very sad state..

I'm not even sure why I'm responding to you.

Since you can't seem to concentrate clearly on what I said, I said Lawson will play, but will be totally ineffective until the following season.

 

You can continue to argue, throw stones, fight and lay on your belly having another consistent temper tantrum kicking and screaming, and the rest of us will just smile...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...