Bleeding Bills Blue Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Its not better than last year. Sorry D Backs < last year LB < Last year RB older OL = same QB = same WR < last year DL = same Tell me how they are better again with a much tougher schedule Got it. Cant formulate an argument to his tape so deflect Theyre not coached by an idiot... We had league worst safeties a year ago - i don't see how our LBs are worse than last year, or how you can possibly say our WRs are worse than a year ago. Edited June 5, 2017 by dneveu
MAJBobby Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 There is zero evidence for this proposition. None. Ok yep none. I mean easy to get YAC when reaching behind or all over to catch balls wow football knowledge people please
Gugny Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 What? Surely, you don't believe that and I've missed sarcasm again on the board. I, too, predict 4 wins. No sarcasm.
26CornerBlitz Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Its not better than last year. Sorry D Backs < last year LB < Last year RB older OL = same QB = same WR < last year DL = same Tell me how they are better again with a much tougher schedule Got it. Cant formulate an argument to his tape so deflect I could see the LB situation being better with Hodges and Ragland in the lineup. The WRs could also be better if Maclin is signed, Sammy stays healthy, and Zay Jones is ready to contribute. Tyrod could also be more productive in the new offense if his weapons stay healthy.
thebandit27 Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Its not better than last year. Sorry D Backs < last year LB < Last year RB older OL = same QB = same WR < last year DL = same Come on now... DBs could be worse, but could just as easily be better. With a scheme change, it's entirely possible that the additions of Hyde, Poyer, and Tre White will be a better overall group than Gilmore and the garbage at safety last year LBs are probably a wash; I don't see how they get worse by going from Zach and Preston to Hodges/Ragland/LorAx. RB is probably worse with Gilly gone The OL is NOT the same; they added Dawkins in round 2, and he'll compete at RT QBs are NOT the same; they have Yates and Peterman. They'll probably be about the same in terms of performance though. WR is extremely debatable. Watkins could easily be an upgrade over his 2016 self with improved health, and I think there's hope that Zay Jones will be an upgrade over Woods. DL is the same, but I also think that it's worth noting that Shaq Lawson will likely have an actual offseason this year.
MAJBobby Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Theyre not coached by an idiot... We had league worst safeties a year ago - i don't see how our LBs are worse than last year, or how you can possibly say our WRs are worse than a year ago. Easy LBer = Lost Brown replaced him with what? Also now have LORAX playing what? Safeties still Suck. Hyde essentially just replaces Williams SS is still horrible WR have what again Sammy and what? Rookies and unknowns This team is much worse that last year with Talent on the field
Jamie Nails Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Kinda thought we'd have any update by this time. Felt like the momo was moving fast in our direction yesterday and now nada.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Watch the all 22s. And come back and tell me he throws with anticipation. And that the WRs were always covered. I got it he can scramble and buy some time. Awesome. As i have said with him from day one not a long term solution until he can progress from pocket. And to Date has not he is at his ceiling. And just not good enough Do you know what play was called on the snaps you are watching? Do you know the progression Tyrod was supposed to follow on the snaps you are watching? Do you know what route each receiver on the field was supposed to run, or do you just see them in space and declare them open? I'm sure you'll dismiss this as excuses, but without that context all-22 is still nothing compared to film review with the team. You'd think if everyone was running free every play the WRs and team in general would be more hesitant to back Tyrod instead of following his leadership.
26CornerBlitz Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 @SalSports NFL Network's @MikeGarafolo says he expects 4-5 serious contenders for Jeremy Maclin and "the Bills' draw will be tempting for him."
MAJBobby Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Do you know what play was called on the snaps you are watching? Do you know the progression Tyrod was supposed to follow on the snaps you are watching? Do you know what route each receiver on the field was supposed to run, or do you just see them in space and declare them open? I'm sure you'll dismiss this as excuses, but without that context all-22 is still nothing compared to film review with the team. You'd think if everyone was running free every play the WRs and team in general would be more hesitant to back Tyrod instead of following his leadership. Again it is easy to know progressions called based on drops and route concepts. But keep deflecting
H2o Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Kinda thought we'd have any update by this time. Felt like the momo was moving fast in our direction yesterday and now nada. The Bills Fanatics people said he would be signed within a couple of days. If we don't hear anything by tomorrow then we should flip out.
MAJBobby Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) @SalSports NFL Network's @MikeGarafolo says he expects 4-5 serious contenders for Jeremy Maclin and "the Bills' draw will be tempting for him." He really should go to a contender. Unless we overpay Edited June 5, 2017 by MAJBobby
BuffaloHokie13 Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Again it is easy to know progressions called based on drops and route concepts. But keep deflecting So you're saying you think you know 1 of the 3 things I asked. Good job. Keep deflecting.
MAJBobby Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Do you know what play was called on the snaps you are watching? Do you know the progression Tyrod was supposed to follow on the snaps you are watching? Do you know what route each receiver on the field was supposed to run, or do you just see them in space and declare them open? I'm sure you'll dismiss this as excuses, but without that context all-22 is still nothing compared to film review with the team. You'd think if everyone was running free every play the WRs and team in general would be more hesitant to back Tyrod instead of following his leadership. Oo you mean being good teammates got it. All you had to do was watch the WR body language last year. So you're saying you think you know 1 of the 3 things I asked. Good job. Keep deflecting.Ok1. Route concept are easy to see 2. Progressions are also easy to figure out based of route concept and drop 3. Yes again route is easy to figure out with drop and other routes being run. Unless of course you are saying all the WR are running wrong routes Edited June 5, 2017 by MAJBobby
JM2009 Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 He really should go to a contender. Unless we overpay Why-because you don't want him here?
r00tabaga Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Its not better than last year. Sorry D Backs < last year LB < Last year RB older OL = same QB = same WR < last year DL = same Tell me how they are better again with a much tougher schedule Got it. Cant formulate an argument to his tape so deflect When you hijack ANOTHER thread with your personal agenda, expect an argument or two. Dbacks < last year but scheme wise, we're better suited this year. LBs < this year. I'll take Hodges & Reggie over Zack any day. RBs < this year Again, I'll take DiMarco & Tolbert over Gillislee all day. Oline & QBs < this year easy...better depth Dline < this year, EASY 4-3 SCHEME Edited June 5, 2017 by r00tabaga
C.Biscuit97 Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 There is zero evidence for this proposition. None. Must be a giant coincidence that all of the best qbs are near the top of this list. https://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-yards-after-catch-statistics/2016/
MAJBobby Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Why-because you don't want him here? Because for him he should go to a better team
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 I, too, predict 4 wins. No sarcasm. Could be but I'm thinking 5 or 6. The team is pretty good imo other than quarterback.
C.Biscuit97 Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 1) I certainly agree that Tom Brady is more accurate than Tyrod Taylor. I don't think anyone's arguing that. 2) Sammy's primary role in Roman's offense was big plays via superb athletic ability and deep ball tracking, which I agree is a misuse and far too limited a role. In college he thrived on screens, slants, and end-arounds. I believe that acquiring Maclin would allow him to serve as the big play receiver and let Sammy's role go back to what he excelled at. JMO. But are those throws what Tyrod excels in? But I agree with your overall point.
Recommended Posts