Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Another sign that things aren't going to go the way the left thinks: 

 

 

Comey's chief of staff quit today - right before he was scheduled to speak to the House Intel committee. 

 

He's either flipped, or about to be indicted. 

 

 

nSugezM.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

nSugezM.jpg

 

Damn straight. We'll see.

 

More on who this guy is and this is an important story (that will, undoubtedly, go under reported in the MSM, as John Carlin's resignation went):

- He was the key guy working on the Clinton exoneration statement

- He was the "communication hub" around the Clinton/Lynch tarmac meeting. 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/23/fbi-small-group-key-figure-james-rybicki-quits-here-comes-the-lois-lerner-manuever/

Posted

Russian bot campaign leading the charge for the partisan right wing written memo to be released. 

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/release-the-memo-campaign-russia-linked-twitter-accounts-2018-1

 

Quote


 


Republican lawmakers are pushing for the House Intelligence Committee to release a memo written by the panel's chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes, that outlines purported surveillance during the transition period against President-elect Donald Trump by former President Barack Obama's administration.

And Russia-linked Twitter bots have jumped on the bandwagon.

#ReleaseTheMemo is the top-trending hashtag among Twitter accounts linked to Russian influence operations, according to Hamilton 68, a website launched last year that says it tracks Russian propaganda in near-real time.

The frequency with which the accounts have been promoting the hashtag has spiked by 233,000% over the past 48 hours, according to the site. The accounts' references to the "memo," meanwhile, have increased by 68,000%.

 

collusion? 

Posted

Remember, this deflection plan was exposed and predicted last Thursday. They coordinated talking points:

 

Nunes/Sessions are Russian ops

Russian Bots pushing the social media narrative

 

... And like clockwork, it comes true to form today. 

 

Don't worry. It won't work. It only makes those who believe it look all the more foolish. Schiff and Pelosi are getting flooded with calls from pissed off Americans today - so much so Schiff's office took the phone off the hook. Don't believe it? Try calling either of their offices. See what you get. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Never forget who started the (modern) usage of Fake News. 

 

It was the Washington Post in response to the Pizzagate hub-bub. 

 

Then they tried to run from it... 

In response to Pizzagate?!?! Lol!! Ok! 

Posted (edited)

November-December 2016: They start the "fake news" trend:

http://archive.is/7AJvc

http://archive.is/2xFIs

http://archive.is/A7Kl4

 

 

January 2017: Then, after having their turn of phrase turned against them, they ran from it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/its-time-to-retire-the-tainted-term-fake-news/2017/01/06/a5a7516c-d375-11e6-945a-76f69a399dd5_story.html?utm_term=.1d6312ba063e

http://archive.is/DMK24

 

This was covered in one thread as it happened, I just can't search well enough on this site to find it.

 

******************************************************************************************************

 

A collection of the new Strozk/Page texts:

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/369815742/Strzok-Page-Text-Messages-5-19-17?irgwc=1&content=27795&campaign=VigLink&ad_group=1726779&keyword=ft500noi&source=impactradius&medium=affiliate#from_embed

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Damn straight. We'll see.

 

More on who this guy is and this is an important story (that will, undoubtedly, go under reported in the MSM, as John Carlin's resignation went):

- He was the key guy working on the Clinton exoneration statement

- He was the "communication hub" around the Clinton/Lynch tarmac meeting. 

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/23/fbi-small-group-key-figure-james-rybicki-quits-here-comes-the-lois-lerner-manuever/

 

Also, this guy was the source for the Axios story regarding McCabe and Wray - which, to me, smelled like a Barium meal (reference earlier Flynn posts). 

 

Now that he's quit, it seems likely he was caught spreading a bogus story about Wray refusing to fire McCabe. 

 

Remember, the leaks have been real, the information has been false. This has happened time and time again. 

 

DUQlkqNXUAAn0TB.jpg

*******************************

 

Re: Russian bots - oops. 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/source-twitter-pins-releasethememo-on-republicans-not-russia

Posted
6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

It boggles the mind that the MSM continues to completely ignore this. All because they hate Trump.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

It boggles the mind that the MSM continues to completely ignore this. All because they hate Trump.

 

Not just the MSM, but otherwise sane, smart people who are on the other side politically. 

 

Not talking about the Tibs of the world or the PastaJoes, but the real life lefties who aren't too far gone down the progressive insanity road.

34 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Question for the lawyers in the house... 

 

By claiming to be Comey's attorney, does that now put everything they discussed under the attorney client privilege umbrella? What's the work around (if any)?

 

 

*******************************

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Question for the lawyers in the house... 

 

By claiming to be Comey's attorney, does that now put everything they discussed under the attorney client privilege umbrella? What's the work around (if any)?

 

 

A lot of depends on when he is claiming he began representing Comey. If I'm an investigator, I would want to know if there are any retainers or letters of engagement signed.

 

The work-around (assuming that he claims he was acting as Comey's attorney prior to the leak) is that Comey waived attorney-client privilege as to the leak issues by testifying to it and identifying the attorney as a "close friend" that he enlisted to leak the information. Once privilege is waived, there is no takesy-backsy.

 

There is also a factual question relating to whenever the attorney claims he started representing Comey, as Comey never testified about the man being his attorney when called to help leak the memo; simply that he was a friend who worked as a law professor at Columbia.

 

The other work-around of a privilege claim is that the attorney was actively involved in a criminal conspiracy with Comey, such as illegally leaking information to the press.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Koko78 said:

 

A lot of depends on when he is claiming he began representing Comey. If I'm an investigator, I would want to know if there are any retainers or letters of engagement signed.

 

The work-around (assuming that he claims he was acting as Comey's attorney prior to the leak) is that Comey waived attorney-client privilege as to the leak issues by testifying to it and identifying the attorney as a "close friend" that he enlisted to leak the information. Once privilege is waived, there is no takesy-backsy.

 

There is also a factual question relating to whenever the attorney claims he started representing Comey, as Comey never testified about the man being his attorney when called to help leak the memo; simply that he was a friend who worked as a law professor at Columbia.

 

The other work-around of a privilege claim is that the attorney was actively involved in a criminal conspiracy with Comey, such as illegally leaking information to the press.

:beer:

 

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/23/white-house-supports-full-transparency-nunes-memo/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS

Posted
7 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Members are divided on releasing it to the public.

 

This right there should bother....... EVERY............. American.

Won't change the fact that Trump's campaign was working with Russians, that there was an misinformation campaign afoot to elect Trump by the Russians, that guilty pleas have already been reached, that indictments have been handed down, that Trump has lied and lied and lied about Russia connections 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Won't change the fact that Trump's campaign was working with Russians, that there was an misinformation campaign afoot to elect Trump by the Russians, that guilty pleas have already been reached, that indictments have been handed down, that Trump has lied and lied and lied about Russia connections 

big-bang-straight-jacket-o.gif

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Won't change the fact that Trump's campaign was working with Russians, that there was an misinformation campaign afoot to elect Trump by the Russians, that guilty pleas have already been reached, that indictments have been handed down, that Trump has lied and lied and lied about Russia connections 

 

Only an idiot believes Trump was in bed with the Russians. 

 

When the Russian collusion delusion gets debunked will you eat crow?

Posted
Just now, njbuff said:

 

Only an idiot believes Trump was in bed with the Russians. 

 

When the Russian collusion delusion gets debunked will you eat crow?

 

It's already been proven to him. Thus, it can't be debunked. 

 

Sure, when you ask him for evidence he comes up empty. I've said from the beginning I'm completely open to the idea that the collusion is real - I just need to see evidence of it that doesn't come from the same talking heads who lied us into the Iraq war (Clapper, Brennan) citing unnamed sources and unknown methods. 

 

The only real evidence produced so far in all of this shows a conspiracy to undermine a legally elected POTUS, constitution and will of the people be damned. 

 

But denial is a hell of a thing. 

×
×
  • Create New...