Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

 


I haven’t been following her but the simple fact that CBS is allowing this tells me the rats are jumping ship. 
 

Expect more chaos and quarantine between now and November. This is going to get ugly. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, dubs said:


I haven’t been following her but the simple fact that CBS is allowing this tells me the rats are jumping ship. 
 

Expect more chaos and quarantine between now and November. This is going to get ugly. 

Are you familiar with Catherine Herridge?

Posted
8 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Are you familiar with Catherine Herridge?


not really, why?

Posted
2 minutes ago, dubs said:


not really, why?

She's one of the few real journalists out there. She called things as she saw them regardless of political ramifications. Back maybe a year ago she switched from Fox News to CBS. There was another real journalist that did the same thing about that moment in time (I forget who) but I can remember thinking that maybe CBS was trying to become more objective. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

She's one of the few real journalists out there. She called things as she saw them regardless of political ramifications. Back maybe a year ago she switched from Fox News to CBS. There was another real journalist that did the same thing about that moment in time (I forget who) but I can remember thinking that maybe CBS was trying to become more objective. 


I recall her name but have been boycotting the news for so long I guess I’ve missed her. 
 

good to know, thanks!  
 

 

Posted
17 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

She's one of the few real journalists out there. She called things as she saw them regardless of political ramifications. Back maybe a year ago she switched from Fox News to CBS. There was another real journalist that did the same thing about that moment in time (I forget who) but I can remember thinking that maybe CBS was trying to become more objective. 

Who is the other real journalist that jumped to another network?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, realtruelove said:

Who is the other real journalist that jumped to another network?

 

I was wondering this as well. Maybe it was John Solomon who left The Hill to start his own venture?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Hedge said:

 

I was wondering this as well. Maybe it was John Solomon who left The Hill to start his own venture?

That could be it.  Let's see if anyone else chimes in.  Maybe one of the trolls knows....

Posted

 

KIMBERLEY STRASSEL: Judging FBI Conduct: The D.C. Circuit becomes the first court to acknowledge the FBI’s 2016 abuse.

House Judiciary Committee Democrats were back at their “politicized Justice Department” theme this week, calling a disgruntled former lieutenant of special counsel Robert Mueller to accuse the department of giving special treatment to President Trump’s allies. Too bad the testimony came on the very day a federal court confirmed that Mr. Mueller’s team and the Federal Bureau of Investigation engaged in misconduct.

 

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit did so via an order requiring Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss charges against former national security adviser Mike Flynn. Most of the focus has been on the legal merits of the ruling. Judge Neomi Rao’s compelling opinion rebuked Judge Sullivan for ignoring the department’s call to drop the case and instead setting himself up as both prosecutor and jury. This was a win for the separation of powers, even as it was a step toward justice for Mr. Flynn.

 

Largely overlooked was the decision’s rebuke of the FBI and the Mueller team. The D.C. Circuit became the first federal court to acknowledge the misconduct that Attorney General William Barr is trying to bring to light. Most of the courts that oversaw Mr. Mueller’s prosecutions were asked to do no more than rubber-stamp a plea deal or sign off on a jury verdict. But Mr. Flynn, backed by tenacious lawyer Sidney Powell, fought the charges—forcing the Justice Department to review its actions, acknowledge its bad acts, and move to dismiss its case. Democrats and the press cast this outcome as evidence of Mr. Barr’s “politicization.” The circuit court begs to differ.

 

The Justice Department’s credibility was at stake here. Judge Sullivan bought into the same Democratic conspiracy theories, which is why he refused Justice’s motion to dismiss and appointed retired judge John Gleeson to act as shadow prosecutor. He argued the Justice Department wasn’t entitled to the usual “presumption of regularity.” And if the circuit judges thought there was anything to claims that Mr. Barr was playing political favorites, it could have allowed the process to continue.

 

Instead they bluntly noted that there was no “legitimate basis” to question the department’s behavior. They even slapped Mr. Gleeson for relying on “news stories, tweets and other facts outside the record.” By contrast, Judge Rao’s opinion notes: “The government’s motion includes an extensive discussion of newly discovered evidence casting Flynn’s guilt into doubt.” It points out that this includes “evidence of misconduct by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” It finishes by noting that each government branch must be encouraged to “self correct when it errs.”

 

The court’s conclusion is obvious. All it had to do was look at the voluminous evidence the Justice Department supplied. Its briefs proved the FBI had improperly pursued Mr. Flynn, keeping open an investigation that produced no evidence, ginning up a “violation” of the seldom-enforced Logan Act, sandbagging Mr. Flynn with an interview that had no “legitimate investigative basis.” It even provided new FBI notes this week suggesting that then-President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were improperly engaged in the investigation. The department’s filings showed that the Mueller team had consistently denied defense attorneys exculpatory information. And it explained the straightforward process by which it had reached its decision to withdraw: Mr. Barr in February appointed veteran U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen to review the case, and in May Mr. Jensen concluded dismissal was “the proper and just course.”

 

 

 

 

 

But Nadler will run interference for this, with the media’s help, because they’re all on the same OrangeManBad team.

 
 
 
 
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

Bongino cracks me up. 

4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

And Twitter hasn't banned him after tweeting this dozens of times so it must be true.  Twitter approved!

Posted
21 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Bongino cracks me up. 

 

And Twitter hasn't banned him after tweeting this dozens of times so it must be true.  Twitter approved!

 

I'm sure it gets shadow banned, but that's precisely why he posts it every morning like clockwork.

Posted (edited)

Where is DR, did the tarts on this site get soros to cough up enough

dough to bribe the mods to cancel him from ppp

Edited by Unforgiven
Posted
8 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

Wow. and i'm guessing even talking about it is a ban.

God bless America, and big brother.

images.jpg


There are two threads about it ... look on page 2 or 3.
 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...