Taro T Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 51 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I agree it would work without the indictments. I do think those indictmeitts are coming though... Could be wrong, but we'll see as the year unfolds. Definitely going to be interesting. And, though it's always true that people should track down original sources whenever possible, with this story it seems that'll be even moreso the case. Expecting a lot of dissonance between what gets reported & what's actually happening. Regardless of whos ox is being gored.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 41 minutes ago, Taro T said: Definitely going to be interesting. And, though it's always true that people should track down original sources whenever possible, with this story it seems that'll be even moreso the case. Expecting a lot of dissonance between what gets reported & what's actually happening. Regardless of whos ox is being gored. Absolutely. Those who have farmed out their critical thinking skills to "authorities" in the media are going to be put in the spin cycle. They're going to be confused, scared, and angry. Our aptitude for discernment and forgiveness is about to be tested.
Warren Zevon Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 21 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Well done. You're even quoting half of your possee sticking up for you. #deepstate
DC Tom Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 1 minute ago, garybusey said: You're even quoting half of your possee sticking up for you. #deepstate Chemtrails and HAARP are blinding you to the truth. WAKE UP, SHEEPL...er, sheepson? What's the singular of "sheeple?"
Nanker Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: Chemtrails and HAARP are blinding you to the truth. WAKE UP, SHEEPL...er, sheepson? What's the singular of "sheeple?" Shitpole
B-Man Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: What's the singular of "sheeple?" Tiberius. . 3
Deranged Rhino Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 13 minutes ago, garybusey said: You're even quoting half of your possee sticking up for you. #deepstate You need to brush up on basic reading skills. Just because they enjoy my stuff doesn't mean they agree with it.
njbuff Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 7 hours ago, Tiberius said: Actually, that's just a clarification, not a retraction. Does nothing to help Trump in any way at all. I just hope this country is ready ready for a President to be facing jail time Obama wouldn't last long in prison. 1
/dev/null Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 1 minute ago, njbuff said: Obama wouldn't last long in prison. i disagree, he'd find a husband
njbuff Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 Just now, /dev/null said: i disagree, he'd find a husband Hillary???????? She has a bigger penis than Obama.
KevinRome Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 I’ve recent become aware of an ex-federal prosecutor that is really informed about what is going on. She wrote a book a few years ago about the egredious abuses by several prosecuters in some high profile cases. They later became became appointed to Obama’s DOJ. Familiar names today. Obama stocked the gov with a bunch of bad cops. I’m still stunned at the breadth of the corruption. Just shows how naive I am. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 (edited) 35 minutes ago, KevinRome said: I’ve recent become aware of an ex-federal prosecutor that is really informed about what is going on. She wrote a book a few years ago about the egredious abuses by several prosecuters in some high profile cases. They later became became appointed to Obama’s DOJ. Familiar names today. Obama stocked the gov with a bunch of bad cops. I’m still stunned at the breadth of the corruption. Just shows how naive I am. So many are, it's nothing to be ashamed of unless you willingly turn a blind eye to it. And remember this, the rot is on both sides. It's systemic, not just one president, not just one party. We've been living in an imaginary democratic republic since 1963. Time for that to change now. Edited January 14, 2018 by Deranged Rhino
Nanker Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 3 hours ago, garybusey said: You're even quoting half of your possee sticking up for you. #deepstate 2
Tiberius Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 15 hours ago, KevinRome said: I’ve recent become aware of an ex-federal prosecutor that is really informed about what is going on. She wrote a book a few years ago about the egredious abuses by several prosecuters in some high profile cases. They later became became appointed to Obama’s DOJ. Familiar names today. Obama stocked the gov with a bunch of bad cops. I’m still stunned at the breadth of the corruption. Just shows how naive I am. Mueller is a fair guy, if he uncovers Trump's money laundering, corruption, obstruction of justice, etc, he will present it fairly. It will be a hell of a situation deciding what to do with Trump. Jail? Maybe, but he'd probably have to be out of office first we are a nation of laws, no one should be above the law, and if Mueller finds Trump broke the law, which seems likely, he will have to be punished
/dev/null Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Mueller is a fair guy, if he uncovers Trump's money laundering, corruption, obstruction of justice, etc, he will present it fairly. It will be a hell of a situation deciding what to do with Trump. Jail? Maybe, but he'd probably have to be out of office first we are a nation of laws, no one should be above the law, and if Mueller finds Trump broke the law, which seems likely, he will have to be punished And if he doesn't, how will you react?
Tiberius Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 Just now, /dev/null said: And if he doesn't, how will you react? Me? Ad Hominem. Why?
/dev/null Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Me? Ad Hominem. Why? You seem to have a vested interest in the findings going a particular direction. How will you react if you hitched your horse to the wrong wagon? 1
Tiberius Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 16 minutes ago, /dev/null said: You seem to have a vested interest in the findings going a particular direction. How will you react if you hitched your horse to the wrong wagon? Ad Hominem again? Why do you do that? What's the point?
Koko78 Posted January 15, 2018 Posted January 15, 2018 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: You seem to have a vested interest in the findings going a particular direction. How will you react if you hitched your horse to the wrong wagon? C'mon man, you know that he's going to turn on Mueller and call him every name in the book, while intentionally forgetting all of the "fair guy" comments he made when holding out hope that the coup will go forward. The only thing that will console Tibs at the end of this investigation would be the hilarity of another Ambassador being murdered. 1
Recommended Posts