Koko78 Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 12 minutes ago, Hedge said: Grenell's new position is announced: Comedian. Getting it 'wrong' implies that they made any effort to get it right (or even cared about getting it right.) 1
GG Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 16 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said: This Flynndication is even better than the last Flynndication If you're saying that this is another opportunity to prove that you're a lying weasel, then yes. 1 3 1
LB3 Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 1 hour ago, dubs said: The urgency related to full disclosure has to be high. If Biden wins, this all goes away on Inauguration Day and probably before that. which does a lot to explain why there was a Muller report, impeachment, the reaction by governors to Covid, and now the nationwide riots. Anything to run out the clock. If Biden loses, the stage certainly seems set for bloodshed. George Floyd's murder was the kindling. Trump winning will be the match. Charges brought against Obama will be the gasoline. He will be deemed another innocent black man that the justice system failed. The United States will burn if things aren't done perfectly if they go after him. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 30 minutes ago, LB3 said: If Biden loses, the stage certainly seems set for bloodshed. George Floyd's murder was the kindling. Trump winning will be the match. Charges brought against Obama will be the gasoline. He will be deemed another innocent black man that the justice system failed. The United States will burn if things aren't done perfectly if they go after him. I think the inverse is also true. Which is the scary part. If Biden wins, and they try to sweep this all away, they will be met by force. However the election goes, November 4th will begin one of the most tenuous and dangerous times in our nation's history. 1 2
BuffaloHokie13 Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 28 minutes ago, LB3 said: If Biden loses, the stage certainly seems set for bloodshed. George Floyd's murder was the kindling. Trump winning will be the match. Charges brought against Obama will be the gasoline. He will be deemed another innocent black man that the justice system failed. The United States will burn if things aren't done perfectly if they go after him. You forgot the step where Chauvin walks because Ellison overcharged. I really hope that doesn't happen... 3
Deranged Rhino Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 Flynn popped up on Gorka's show too. And Hannity's radio show as well. Clips coming: 1 2
GG Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 24 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: You forgot the step where Chauvin walks because Ellison overcharged. I really hope that doesn't happen... I have a hunch they will play up their interpersonal angle, and upped charges will stick 2
SectionC3 Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I'm surprised Powell let him go on. It probably is all over, but what if... It’s a pretty stark split between majority and dissent. According to the dissent, there’s also a circuit split. That, coupled with the unique nature of the underlying legal issue, makes it a good candidate for an en banc. And let’s be clear here. This ruling is elevation of form over substance. Personally I don’t care whether Flynn is guilty, innocent, or somewhere in between. This decision invites prosecutorial abuse and favoritism. The vehicle by which Flynn now likely will escape further prosecution subjugates substance to prosecutorial caprice. The worm someday will turn and there will be a defendant who the pro-Flynn crowd doesn’t like who will benefit from this. It will be wrong then, too. 1 hour ago, GG said: If you're saying that this is another opportunity to prove that you're a lying weasel, then yes. Hoax. You’re the weasel. Do you still believe that Jews have an obligation to be racist? I haven’t heard much from you lately, which is surprising since you’re allegedly the intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong crowd around here. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: It’s a pretty stark split between majority and dissent. According to the dissent, there’s also a circuit split. That, coupled with the unique nature of the underlying legal issue, makes it a good candidate for an en banc. And let’s be clear here. This ruling is elevation of form over substance. Personally I don’t care whether Flynn is guilty, innocent, or somewhere in between. This decision invites prosecutorial abuse and favoritism. The vehicle by which Flynn now likely will escape further prosecution subjugates substance to prosecutorial caprice. The worm someday will turn and there will be a defendant who the pro-Flynn crowd doesn’t like who will benefit from this. It will be wrong then, too. GTFOH. "I don't care whether Flynn is guilty..." yet you spent months here embarrassing yourself screaming he was guilty. Try to spin this all you want, but what was shown today was that you were wrong -- again. And if you weren't a coward, you'd be taking a year off now. But you weaseled away from that because you lack any semblance of a backbone or functioning testicles. Keep trying to run away from fact, reason, and logic while claiming to be a brilliant legal mind. The truth is there for all to see now. You're full of it. Always have been. And you're a terrible attorney. You should give back your degree. Edited June 24, 2020 by Deranged Rhino 3
GG Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. You’re the weasel. Do you still believe that Jews have an obligation to be racist? I haven’t heard much from you lately, which is surprising since you’re allegedly the intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong crowd around here. Wrong as always. That wasn't the question. It was "are Jews excused from being called racists since they're brown?" 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 1 minute ago, GG said: Wrong as always. That wasn't the question. It was "are Jews excused from being called racists since they're brown?" He can't help himself. He's deeply embarrassed right now and spinning wildly to try to throw shite in every direction in the hopes it helps people forget his own idiocy.
B-Man Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 JUDGING THE FLYNN CASE JUDGE: A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. has basically ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case against General Flynn. High time. Alas, the decision was 2-1. Powerline’s Scott Johnson has posted the majority opinion. Choice quote from Scott: “The Flynn case constitutes a sidebar to the biggest political scandal in American history by far. One can only hope that this is, as it should be, the end of the road for this utterly disgraceful case.” 1 3
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 7 minutes ago, B-Man said: JUDGING THE FLYNN CASE JUDGE: A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. has basically ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case against General Flynn. High time. Alas, the decision was 2-1. Powerline’s Scott Johnson has posted the majority opinion. Choice quote from Scott: “The Flynn case constitutes a sidebar to the biggest political scandal in American history by far. One can only hope that this is, as it should be, the end of the road for this utterly disgraceful case.” ....with the way good 'ol Emmett tried to upstage the DC US Court of Appeals, knowing they had precedent, I'm surprised there was a dissenting vote....
snafu Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 (edited) 41 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: And let’s be clear here. This ruling is elevation of form over substance. Flynn’s guilty plea seems pretty much form over substance, too. One form over substance outcome doesn’t carry any more weight than the other. According to you the end result, and only the end result, counts. This case isn’t yet officially over. Flynn is still guilty as of 5:14 today. Isn’t that how it goes? And I guess nobody really needed to hear from an amicus after all. Edited June 24, 2020 by snafu 2
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 1 minute ago, snafu said: Flynn’s guilty plea seems pretty much form over substance, too. One form over substance outcome doesn’t carry any more weight than the other. According to you the end result, and only the end result, counts. This case isn’t yet officially over. Flynn is still guilty as of 5:14 today. Isn’t that how it goes? I'm going to wait for Holder's Op-Ed piece to get the real scoop.......probably one of the best AG's in US history.................. 2
keepthefaith Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 45 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And you're a terrible attorney. Could be. There is a bell curve in every profession. 1
SectionC3 Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 1 hour ago, GG said: Wrong as always. That wasn't the question. It was "are Jews excused from being called racists since they're brown?" Hoax. It was the question. You inserted the word "being" in today. But you didn't have it initially. 43 minutes ago, snafu said: Flynn’s guilty plea seems pretty much form over substance, too. One form over substance outcome doesn’t carry any more weight than the other. According to you the end result, and only the end result, counts. This case isn’t yet officially over. Flynn is still guilty as of 5:14 today. Isn’t that how it goes? And I guess nobody really needed to hear from an amicus after all. Hoax. Except for the fact that he is still guilty. 51 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ....with the way good 'ol Emmett tried to upstage the DC US Court of Appeals, knowing they had precedent, I'm surprised there was a dissenting vote.... Try reading the dissent. 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: He can't help himself. He's deeply embarrassed right now and spinning wildly to try to throw shite in every direction in the hopes it helps people forget his own idiocy. Fake news. 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: GTFOH. "I don't care whether Flynn is guilty..." yet you spent months here embarrassing yourself screaming he was guilty. Try to spin this all you want, but what was shown today was that you were wrong -- again. And if you weren't a coward, you'd be taking a year off now. But you weaseled away from that because you lack any semblance of a backbone or functioning testicles. Keep trying to run away from fact, reason, and logic while claiming to be a brilliant legal mind. The truth is there for all to see now. You're full of it. Always have been. And you're a terrible attorney. You should give back your degree. Hoax.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted June 24, 2020 Posted June 24, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. It was the question. You inserted the word "being" in today. But you didn't have it initially. Hoax. Except for the fact that he is still guilty. Try reading the dissent. Fake news. fake lawyer.........hide your fraud versus displaying it.......Ebay may recall your shingle............. Edited June 24, 2020 by OldTimeAFLGuy
Recommended Posts