Foxx Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 45 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said: ... Stop being intellectually dishonest hahahahahahahaaa, you weren't looking in the mirror when you blurted this out were you? 5
Warren Zevon Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, Foxx said: hahahahahahahaaa, you weren't looking in the mirror when you blurted this out were you? There is literal evidence of his intellectual dishonesty 1
Foxx Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 Sundances' take, over at the CTH, on today's proceedings. seems to make quite a bit of sense in today's environment. Understanding Likelihood of DC Circuit Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus…. 1 1 2
Warren Zevon Posted June 14, 2020 Posted June 14, 2020 Will Brian Cates cry when Flynn is finally Flynndicated?
Nanker Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 On 6/12/2020 at 2:53 PM, Warren Zevon said: That's okay - liberals can't meme anyway And they can't sing or dance either.
Foxx Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: unclear. the wording of the article title would seem to suggest that the DOJ has already subpoenaed the e-mails. however, the body would seem to suggest this is an opinion that it would be advisable only. Edited June 15, 2020 by Foxx 3
Deranged Rhino Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 28 minutes ago, Foxx said: unclear. the wording of the article title would seem to suggest that the DOJ has already subpoenaed the e-mails. however, the body would seem to suggest this is an opinion that it would be advisable only. I think it’s speculation — that’s my take at least. 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 On 6/12/2020 at 10:26 AM, snafu said: No, he's using this hypothetical as an example of a "bad" motive by the DOJ to pull the case. It is akin to the accusation in this case that the President brought pressure on the DOJ to dismiss. I think he's playing devil's advocate. I worked with a lady who, as it turns out, was a fundamentalist Christian. I was unaware and said to her one day "To play devil's advocate..." , she stopped, looked at me in horror and said "HE DOES NOT NEED AN ADVOCATE!". I wasn't even sure initially who she was talking about. 1 2 1
Joe Miner Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 51 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I worked with a lady who, as it turns out, was a fundamentalist Christian. I was unaware and said to her one day "To play devil's advocate..." , she stopped, looked at me in horror and said "HE DOES NOT NEED AN ADVOCATE!". I wasn't even sure initially who she was talking about. Maybe she's just not a Pacino fan? 2
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 49 minutes ago, Joe Miner said: Maybe she's just not a Pacino fan? She also used to say to me things like....”blah blah blah it was gross tech.”. She used it fairly often in a variety of contexts when I realized she was trying to say “grotesque”. She was 10 years or so younger than I, I really thought it was something all the cool kids were saying. It could be Pacino though, I hadn’t considered that.
Koko78 Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 2 hours ago, Foxx said: unclear. the wording of the article title would seem to suggest that the DOJ has already subpoenaed the e-mails. however, the body would seem to suggest this is an opinion that it would be advisable only. I read it as some guy's fantasy scenario. I would not be in favor of the DOJ going after the judge's emails, absent some probable cause that there was something illegal in there. 2
GG Posted June 15, 2020 Posted June 15, 2020 17 minutes ago, Koko78 said: I read it as some guy's fantasy scenario. I would not be in favor of the DOJ going after the judge's emails, absent some probable cause that there was something illegal in there. Yeah, there have been a bunch of fantasy retribution theories floated this week that should never see the light of day. 1 1
Recommended Posts