Buffalo_Gal Posted June 11, 2020 Posted June 11, 2020 39 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Boy, this comment gets it (second tweet): 1 1
Joe Miner Posted June 11, 2020 Posted June 11, 2020 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: No, if the case is not dismissed with prejudice, I go on vacation for a year. When it is dismissed with prejudice, you go on vacation for a year. That's the terms. Seems more likely he'll just create a new account. Kinda his MO. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted June 11, 2020 Posted June 11, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Joe Miner said: Seems more likely he'll just create a new account. Kinda his MO. Of course he will. He's an intellectually dishonest coward. He proved it with his last post. Accusing me of trying to create wiggle room when he's the one playing semantics. SuperShittyLawyerSection has brought nothing of value to this thread other than exposing his own ignorance -- and the fact that he's a terrible attorney who can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag. Edited June 11, 2020 by Deranged Rhino
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 11, 2020 Posted June 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Of course he will. He's an intellectually dishonest coward. He proved it with his last post. Accusing me of trying to create wiggle room when he's the one playing semantics. SuperShittyLawyerSection has brought nothing of value to this thread other than exposing his own ignorance -- and the fact that he's a terrible attorney who can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag. And you still believe he's an attorney? Even after all the nonsense he's spouted!? And you believe he'd honor a bet when proven wrong? You're a good guy, but come on... he would never, ever uphold to the terms of the bet. He'd simply come back under a different nic. 1
3rdnlng Posted June 11, 2020 Posted June 11, 2020 39 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: And you still believe he's an attorney? Even after all the nonsense he's spouted!? And you believe he'd honor a bet when proven wrong? You're a good guy, but come on... he would never, ever uphold to the terms of the bet. He'd simply come back under a different nic. Yes, he could very well be an attorney. There are a lot of dumb attorneys in this world and I've dealt with my share. There are also a lot of very good ones that are a pleasure to work with. Point to remember: never, ever come to an agreement with an attorney without recognizing that their negotiations never end. You can have a signed agreement and they'll still try to squeeze a little bit more out of you. Even otherwise good attorneys will do this. Just never go to your bottom line until the final end. Leave some room.
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 This was helpful to me. Others may want to read her thread. 5
KRC Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 On 6/10/2020 at 3:54 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: Why do I get the idea SectionC3 is a receptionist at a law office and thinks he knows more than he actually does? Why disparage receptionists? 3 1
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 15 minutes out. Here's the link to the livestream again for those curious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a15exlPAA3U 2 2
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 And we're off... Powell up for 10 first. Then DOJ, then Sullivan's lawyer. 3
Deranged Rhino Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 One of several threads out there covering the play by play: 1 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 Wall is making a case even a dummy like me can understand. 2 1
snafu Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 (edited) "There's nothing 'magical' about the 'plea line'" -- DOJ argues. Says Fokker doesn't prohibit this stance. Edited June 12, 2020 by snafu 3
snafu Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 Is the Court saying that the Government should disclose ALL reasons for wanting to dismiss? Is it the Court's job to "rank" reasons if there's more than one? Wouldn't a "good" reason to dismiss be just as important as a "bad" reason? 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 Does this Obama judge think Flynn killed George Floyd? This is weird. (For all I know it is common, but as a lay person, seems weird.) 2
snafu Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Does this Obama judge think Flynn killed George Floyd? This is weird. (For all I know it is common, but as a lay person, seems weird.) No, he's using this hypothetical as an example of a "bad" motive by the DOJ to pull the case. It is akin to the accusation in this case that the President brought pressure on the DOJ to dismiss. I think he's playing devil's advocate. Edited June 12, 2020 by snafu 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 12, 2020 Posted June 12, 2020 Sullivan's attorney seems to be arguing... let's keep going. You never know what Sullivan is gonna do! Man, what Flynn has to say must really be something that the #resistance crowd is going to these lengths. 2
Recommended Posts