OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 27, 2020 Posted May 27, 2020 ...wow......and here I thought "Sleepy Bob" was also "Squeaky Clean Bob"....I've been duped...………. Gregg Jarrett: Trump attorney accuses Mueller of 'monstrous lie and scheme to defraud' By Gregg Jarrett | Fox News John Dowd, one of the lead lawyers who represented President Trump during Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian collusion, said Tuesday that the special counsel engineered a perjury trap for Trump in the exact same way that James Comey’s FBI invented a trap for former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. “Mueller’s scheme was the same one captured in the (newly released) FBI set-up notes pertaining to Flynn. They knew they had nothing, but using their official power they created and perpetuated the facade of an investigation,” said Dowd. In an extensive interview on Tuesday, Dowd explained to me how his commitment of cooperation and transparency in dealing with Mueller was eventually turned against the president, as the special counsel “misled” Trump’s legal team in order to manufacture a crime where none existed. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-attorney-accuses-mueller-lie-defraud-gregg-jarrett 1 2
Koko78 Posted May 27, 2020 Posted May 27, 2020 22 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: So was Horowitz running cover for the FBI when he claimed there was no evidence of political bias? Was he lied to and shielded from the evidence? Was he just dumb? 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 27, 2020 Posted May 27, 2020 26 minutes ago, Koko78 said: So was Horowitz running cover for the FBI when he claimed there was no evidence of political bias? Was he lied to and shielded from the evidence? Was he just dumb? My guess was the middle option. I think Horowitz has/had an unconscious bend to lean towards protecting the institution(s) when possible -- but only to a point. Based on how slow the evidence was turned over from the DOJ to Flynn's legal teams, I would suspect there were games being played with the IG. It's really all down to Durham and the other US attorneys looking into everything (there are at least two more, Jensen and Huber). And I think we're still 4-5 weeks away from hearing anything from him (that's a guess, not a prediction). 1 2
B-Man Posted May 28, 2020 Posted May 28, 2020 GOOD: Criminal Referrals Imminent In Obamagate Probe, Mueller Team Being Investigated. 5
Deranged Rhino Posted May 28, 2020 Posted May 28, 2020 (edited) I have to say, I've heard this one before. I've had people tell me that the (still) redacted portion of RR's revised scope memo was for Walid. I always dismissed this because the idea that that FBI -- even a crooked one -- would give more than a quick glance at a man like Walid -- seemed like a bridge too far. But there are signals now that it was legit -- which is hilarious in its outrageousness. ... It also lends more credence to the MB theory... but that's for a different thread. Edited May 28, 2020 by Deranged Rhino 1 2
Deranged Rhino Posted May 29, 2020 Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: They never learn... every drop of transparency has worked against the collusion narrative engineers. Not for them. Every time. https://mobile.twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1266157405659901953 And it really doesn’t take a former US Attorney to puzzle this out, but: https://mobile.twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1266168060114685952 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 29, 2020 Posted May 29, 2020 Fear And Grenell already said they're not summaries. Release: https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05-29 ODNI to CEG RHJ (Flynn Transcripts).pdf 2 3
billsfan1959 Posted May 29, 2020 Posted May 29, 2020 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: + More (It was always a coup) Read through it all. Can't find anything that would warrant the concerns raised at the Jan 05 meeting at the WH - or for keeping Crossfire Razor open 3
Deranged Rhino Posted May 29, 2020 Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, billsfan1959 said: Read through it all. Can't find anything that would warrant the concerns raised at the Jan 05 meeting at the WH - or for keeping Crossfire Razor open Correct -- and it proves "sanctions" weren't the topic. Expulsions were, and that was known, reasonable, and expected to occur. It also shows why the DOJ ruled the call wasn't criminal or in violation in any way prior to the FBI going to interview him. This is a major blow to the narrative that has been force fed on many (including the loudest asshats here). They were lied to, repeatedly. Now they can see that for themselves. But watch how many will take GarBoTibs' approach of trying to spin it. 2 2
Recommended Posts