Koko78 Posted May 22, 2020 Posted May 22, 2020 4 hours ago, Tiberius said: Flynn lied to protect Trump Identify the specific statement made by Flynn, which you claim was a lie "to protect Trump".
B-Man Posted May 23, 2020 Posted May 23, 2020 The Italian Connection: Why Did the U.S. Ambassador to Italy and His Deputy Request Unmaskings of Flynn Calls? 2 2
realtruelove Posted May 23, 2020 Posted May 23, 2020 He's obviously stalling. Perhaps someone with legal expertise can explain the possible course of actions. Was this not one of his options in this case? Does he have the legal right to do this? If yes, then why didn't someone anticipate it.
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 23, 2020 Posted May 23, 2020 23 minutes ago, realtruelove said: He's obviously stalling. Perhaps someone with legal expertise can explain the possible course of actions. Was this not one of his options in this case? Does he have the legal right to do this? If yes, then why didn't someone anticipate it. Good questions! What I have been reading from people who work in federal courts is the order to personally respond is extraordinary. If he was ordered to respond himself, and instead has a personal attorney do it for him, is that the same as not responding? Because not responding the writ is granted. Could he be referred for judicial misconduct for refusing a demand from a higher court by not responding himself as ordered? 1
Koko78 Posted May 23, 2020 Posted May 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Good questions! What I have been reading from people who work in federal courts is the order to personally respond is extraordinary. If he was ordered to respond himself, and instead has a personal attorney do it for him, is that the same as not responding? Because not responding the writ is granted. Could he be referred for judicial misconduct for refusing a demand from a higher court by not responding himself as ordered? As to both of your questions, I doubt it. There's nothing wrong or improper with Sullivan hiring an attorney to respond for him. Not sure what his argument is going to be, considering the weight of the applicable caselaw is against his keeping the case against Flynn active. 3 2
3rdnlng Posted May 24, 2020 Posted May 24, 2020 50 minutes ago, Koko78 said: As to both of your questions, I doubt it. There's nothing wrong or improper with Sullivan hiring an attorney to respond for him. Not sure what his argument is going to be, considering the weight of the applicable caselaw is against his keeping the case against Flynn active. Who pays for the attorney? 1 1
Koko78 Posted May 24, 2020 Posted May 24, 2020 22 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Who pays for the attorney? That's an interesting question. I'm not sure. I would assume we are, considering that he is responding to the Circuit Court in his capacity as District Court Judge. 2
Reality Check Posted May 24, 2020 Posted May 24, 2020 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/flynn-judge-outsources-high-profile-lawyer-explain-why-he-wont-dismiss-case This judge is toast. Check mate. 2
Hedge Posted May 24, 2020 Posted May 24, 2020 (edited) Posting for the video, not the comment: I am not on the train (yet) that somehow Gowdy was complicit in any of this. Recall that POTUS and Jay Sekulow were speaking publicly about Gowdy joining his impeachment legal defense team, until that got delayed due to lobbying issues. Edited May 24, 2020 by Hedge 2
Albwan Posted May 25, 2020 Posted May 25, 2020 (edited) On 5/24/2020 at 1:05 AM, Prickly Pete said: I think Gowdy is full of *****. Seriously my gut tells me this dude just loves the sound of his own voice. Edited May 25, 2020 by Albwan
Recommended Posts