OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, Foxx said: tell me oh great and wonderful, if his guilt is so resolved, why isn't he sentenced and the case over and done with? hint: because it isn't resolved... ...this should be good bro......probably exceeds his 343 page brief to adjudicate a client's parking ticket....... 2
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 26 minutes ago, Foxx said: i'd quit while i was behind if i was you until you actually did some discovery with regard here. He can't. He's too dishonest for that. And far too intellectually challenged. He can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag, as he's proven over and over here. So he's either not really an attorney, or an incompetent one. Either way, he's lost. 2 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: He can't. He's too dishonest for that. And far too intellectually challenged. He can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag, as he's proven over and over here. So he's either not really an attorney, or an incompetent one. Either way, he's lost. ...isn't Avenatti a purported "lawyer"?....just askin'...... 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: He can't. He's too dishonest for that. And far too intellectually challenged. He can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag, as he's proven over and over here. So he's either not really an attorney, or an incompetent one. Either way, he's lost. If he really is an attorney .... I'm hoping it is a real estate or patent attorney (my cousin is a patent attorney, dry, dry, dry). Please, please, please not a criminal attorney. ? 2
Foxx Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 (edited) 26 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: ... Still no education on Brady from the Foxxy expert. I'm waiting. you're lucky i'm such a nice guy. start here and read forward. if you really want to discover what is going on, you'll do the rest yourself. if you come back with some lame excuse that you seem to be so good at, i'll know your not serious about being educated and are nothing more than a troll. Edited May 15, 2020 by Foxx 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: If he really is an attorney .... I'm hoping it is a real estate or patent attorney (my cousin is a patent attorney, dry, dry, dry). Please, please, please not a criminal attorney. ? ....no but I'd bet he stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night...SMH........... 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Again, the timeline is damning if you look (instead of making up what you think you know about the matter like a certain 3rd chair) 2 6
keepthefaith Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: If he really is an attorney .... I'm hoping it is a real estate or patent attorney (my cousin is a patent attorney, dry, dry, dry). Commercial real estate and intellectual property law, great areas of practice. Potentially big money and mostly clean work and decent clients. 4
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 22 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Simple question. Did he plead guilty? If the answer is yes, then the question of his guilt is resolved. The open question is whether he is allowed to vacate the plea. It's a different legal question. Which I'm sure you know given your expertise in this area. Another post, another misused legal term. Nice work. I think the Flynn case is anything but simple, especially when someone with your legal background struggles to explain his perspective to a humble man of God like me. If the plea is vacated, and the case dropped, in your world, is he still guilty? If the plea is vacated, and General Flynn set free, and the DOJ continues to espouse his innocence, was he still convicted (maybe) as you have halfheartedly argued? Or....is your suggestion that because he initially plead guilty (as he surely did), and may subsequently be vindicated, plea withdrawn and charges dropped, that he was guilty from ××/xx/17 to ××/xx/20? It just seems that so many things are unresolved. Warmly. LS 2 2
Hedge Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 30 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: DAMN HER! SHE WAS PREPARED! 4 6 1
3rdnlng Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Hedge said: DAMN HER! SHE WAS PREPARED! It's not fair that she comes prepared when the vast majority of the so called journalists are handicapped with their heads up their asses. Hell, they can't even sit down. Edited May 15, 2020 by 3rdnlng 1 2 1
GG Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 3 hours ago, SectionC3 said: And, as a general matter, it's perfectly proper for law enforcement to capitalize on a defendant's reluctance to have a family member involved in a pending investigation. So in essence this is a crime in a name of the son? I'm guessing if the setting was Ireland in the '70s Belfast, you and your fellow travelers would be lining up to applaud the Oscar worthy tale of the father taking the plea for the son. 2 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Important: https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1261428128347537408 4 5
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 16, 2020 Posted May 16, 2020 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Good stuff. Let’s get to it. 3
Orlando Buffalo Posted May 16, 2020 Posted May 16, 2020 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I am actually trying to get clarification- is there an actual transcript they can reference? I was under the impression the 302 was just the notes of the agent. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 16, 2020 Posted May 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: I am actually trying to get clarification- is there an actual transcript they can reference? I was under the impression the 302 was just the notes of the agent. The original 302 is “missing.” A 302 report is written from agent notes. 3 1 1 2
Recommended Posts