Nanker Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 Why did Loretta Lynch lobby the State Department to give a Russian spy a visa?
Tiberius Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 19 minutes ago, Nanker said: Why did Loretta Lynch lobby the State Department to give a Russian spy a visa? Link?
3rdnlng Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Link? Is it you? Edited January 11, 2018 by 3rdnlng
Tiberius Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Is it you? Trump thrives because of voters as unintelligent and uninformed as you
Tiberius Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 Interesting to see how Trump is now running scared from the idea of voluntarily testifying before Mueller, after saying he would 100% testify. Hope the subpoena him.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 2 hours ago, Nanker said: Why did Preet Bahrara sign off on a visa for Natalia Veselnitskaya so she could enter the US and meet with Trump campaign officials? Just doing Loretta Lynch’s bidding? After all, she lobbied the State Department to get the visa for her. Good question. I say it goes higher than Lynch. Have you noticed who was the translator for that meeting? That's a connection I've been waiting for someone to pick up on.
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 20 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Interesting to see how Trump is now running scared from the idea of voluntarily testifying before Mueller, after saying he would 100% testify. Hope the subpoena him. Subpoena him to what? Do you even know what a subpoena is? Actually, do you even know what the difference between an interview and testimony is?
Deranged Rhino Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 Just now, Koko78 said: Subpoena him to what? Do you even know what a subpoena is? Actually, do you even know what the difference between an interview and testimony is? You're going to make his brain malfunction.
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're going to make his brain malfunction. That's a hell of a leap of faith to assume he has a brain. 1
Tiberius Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Subpoena him to what? Do you even know what a subpoena is? Actually, do you even know what the difference between an interview and testimony is? Yes, yes and yes 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're going to make his brain malfunction. Lol, not from you clowns
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Yes, yes and yes The first question wasn't a yes or no question, dipshit.
Tiberius Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: The first question wasn't a yes or no question, dipshit. Yes, I guess they will ask him what he knew and when he knew it. (You can stop reading now, because I am going to say something you do not believe is true.) They will ask him about what he knew about his campaign's involvement in working with Russia. Did he know about the meeting at Trump Tower, for instance? Steve Bannon says of course he would have.
3rdnlng Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 6 minutes ago, Koko78 said: The first question wasn't a yes or no question, dipshit. 6 minutes ago, Koko78 said: The first question wasn't a yes or no question, dipshit. What, did you expect him to get them all right? https://tenor.com/view/monkey-typing-gif-9631515
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Yes, I guess they will ask him what he knew and when he knew it. (You can stop reading now, because I am going to say something you do not believe is true.) They will ask him about what he knew about his campaign's involvement in working with Russia. Did he know about the meeting at Trump Tower, for instance? Steve Bannon says of course he would have. Clearly you don't understand what a subpoena is. A subpoena is a directive to appear (or produce documentation) to a court. It is not used, and cannot be used, to compel someone to show up at your office for an interview. A subpoena cannot be used to compel someone to submit to questioning outside of an official court proceeding - as in a trial or other evidentiary hearing. 1
Tiberius Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 Just now, Koko78 said: Clearly you don't understand what a subpoena is. A subpoena is a directive to appear (or produce documentation) to a court. It is not used, and cannot be used, to compel someone to show up at your office for an interview. A subpoena cannot be used to compel someone to submit to questioning outside of an official court proceeding - as in a trial or other evidentiary hearing. Yes, stupid, if he refuses to talk he can be given a subpoena to testify in one of the grand juries already sitting. Wow, you sure got me there!
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Yes, stupid, if he refuses to talk he can be given a subpoena to testify in one of the grand juries already sitting. Wow, you sure got me there! Which goes back to you having absolutely no understanding of what the difference is between an interview and testimony.
row_33 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 Tibs just types and sends without Mr. Brain even coming between fingers and keyboard 1
snafu Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Yes, I guess they will ask him what he knew and when he knew it. (You can stop reading now, because I am going to say something you do not believe is true.) They will ask him about what he knew about his campaign's involvement in working with Russia. Did he know about the meeting at Trump Tower, for instance? Steve Bannon says of course he would have. Did you know that whether someone is under oath or not it is a crime to lie to the FBI? Like when Hillary was interviewed by the FBI. She wasn't under oath. So she lied to the FBI (and wasn't charged for it), or she told the truth to the FBI (and wasn't charged for it). So if there's no evidence of collusion, Trump can go and tell the truth and he won't be in the same position as Hillary -- who committed a crime either way. But, hey, it's okay to leave her alone because she apologized, right? 1
row_33 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 Nothing the Dems do will be under suspicion or investigated or charged.
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 14 minutes ago, row_33 said: Nothing the Dems do will be under suspicion or investigated or charged. That's what happens when you load the investigations with partisan Democrat hacks.
Recommended Posts