Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Of course he knew. He asked to be kept informed on everything they were doing. 

Fitton paraphrased... 'i expect judge Sullivan to pursue criminal contempt proceedings against the prosecutors'... '(Sullivan should ask) who knew what and when did they know it?'

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
25 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Fitton paraphrased... 'i expect judge Sullivan to pursue criminal contempt proceedings against the prosecutors'... '(Sullivan should ask) who knew what and when did they know it?'


I will be very interested in seeing what Sullivan does. Does he sign the Flynn order? Does he open a can of whoop-ass on the prosecutors? Flynn's "defense" attorneys... what happens with them? Besides Flynn suing them for malpractice, who goes after them on a licensing level? Can they (will they) be charged with anything? If so, what?

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I will be very interested in seeing what Sullivan does. Does he sign the Flynn order? Does he open a can of whoop-ass on the prosecutors? Flynn's "defense" attorneys... what happens with them? Besides Flynn suing them for malpractice, who goes after them on a licensing level? Can they (will they) be charged with anything? If so, what?

 

i would think that he should be very upset with Van Grack's misrepresentations. as Techo Frog pointed out, those, 'misrepresentations' (some might call them 'lies'), caused him to issue an inaccurate opinion. i don't imagine any judge wants to be lied to and thus have it reflect badly back upon them. @Koko78 might have some insight on this.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
29 minutes ago, Foxx said:

i would think that he should be very upset with Van Grack's misrepresentations. as Techo Frog pointed out, those, 'misrepresentations' (some might call them 'lies'), caused him to issue an inaccurate opinion. i don't imagine any judge wants to be lied to and thus have it reflect badly back upon them. @Koko78 might have some insight on this.

 

I'm not sure the judge can actually do anything to him for the misrepresentations, other than report his unethical conduct to whatever the appropriate attorney discipline agency is in that jurisdiction. Nothing I saw in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure addresses attorney misconduct (unlike Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), and I am not interested enough to try to find any applicable Federal statutes.

 

However, I wouldn't suggest that Mr. Van Grack appear in front of Judge Sullivan - for any reason - in the near future.

  • Thank you (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...