Nanker Posted January 2, 2018 Posted January 2, 2018 Not collusion? NOT collusion? NOT COLLUSION? WTF have you and the #Resistance been saying for the past 14 months? Conspiracy my azz. There's more evidence of collusion AND conspiracy that the Dems, Hillary's campaign, the Clinton Foundation, the Podestas, Fusion GPS, Huma Habadabadabin, Debbie Syphilis-Test Schultz interfered with the free election process in 2016. 1
Tiberius Posted January 2, 2018 Posted January 2, 2018 30 minutes ago, Nanker said: Not collusion? NOT collusion? NOT COLLUSION? WTF have you and the #Resistance been saying for the past 14 months? Conspiracy my azz. There's more evidence of collusion AND conspiracy that the Dems, Hillary's campaign, the Clinton Foundation, the Podestas, Fusion GPS, Huma Habadabadabin, Debbie Syphilis-Test Schultz interfered with the free election process in 2016. Nope, Trump conspired with Russians illegally to screw with our election. Collusion is not a crime
Koko78 Posted January 2, 2018 Posted January 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Nanker said: Not collusion? NOT collusion? NOT COLLUSION? WTF have you and the #Resistance been saying for the past 14 months? That's old news, and doesn't count in light of the latest DNC talking points memo.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 2, 2018 Posted January 2, 2018 As the MSM tries to make something more of the GP story, remember some key facts: Is he connected to Fusion GPS and a Russian spy? Yup. http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/01/george-papadopouloss-fascinating-link-to-the-trump-dossier/ Was he hired at a time when Clinton was trying to "prop up" Trump as a viable candidate? Yup. https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/ Almost IMMEDIATELY after he was hired, GP - a nobody with delusions of grandeur, tried 6 times (and was denied 6 times) to set a meeting with Trump and Russians. Was he setting a trap? Perhaps on Fusion's behalf? Hmmm... Now, remember the secret court hearing regarding GP's guilty plea. He was "put back into the wild", probably wearing a wire - but wearing a wire to entrap whom? Per the orders of the judge, detailed in the link below, he was not allowed to speak with ANYONE on team Trump... so whom was he wearing the wire for if not Trump? https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/08/secret-hearing-mueller-trump-probe-244653 How do those facts add up to you? Do they add up to bad new for Trump... or bad news for... 2018 is going to be glorious.
/dev/null Posted January 2, 2018 Posted January 2, 2018 4 hours ago, Nanker said: To be fair she was breathing the air in Cleveland 1
Tiberius Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Wow, Fusion GPS speaks! NYTmes publishes their response to Republican obstructionism Read the whole thing it's great https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/opinion/republicans-investigation-fusion-gps.html?mtrref=www.politico.com&assetType=opinion&_r=0 Yes, we hired Mr. Steele, a highly respected Russia expert. But we did so without informing him whom we were working for and gave him no specific marching orders beyond this basic question: Why did Mr. Trump repeatedly seek to do deals in a notoriously corrupt police state that most serious investors shun? What came back shocked us. Mr. Steele’s sources in Russia (who were not paid) reported on an extensive — and now confirmed — effort by the Kremlin to help elect Mr. Trump president. Mr. Steele saw this as a crime in progress and decided he needed to report it to the F.B.I. We did not discuss that decision with our clients, or anyone else. Instead, we deferred to Mr. Steele, a trusted friend and intelligence professional with a long history of working with law enforcement. We did not speak to the F.B.I. and haven’t since. After the election, Mr. Steele decided to share his intelligence with Senator John McCain via an emissary. We helped him do that. The goal was to alert the United States national security community to an attack on our country by a hostile foreign power. We did not, however, share the dossier with BuzzFeed, which to our dismay published it last January. We’re extremely proud of our work to highlight Mr. Trump’s Russia ties. To have done so is our right under the First Amendment. It is time to stop chasing rabbits. The public still has much to learn about a man with the most troubling business past of any United States president. Congress should release transcripts of our firm’s testimony, so that the American people can learn the truth about our work and most important, what happened to our democracy.
Tiberius Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 I guess our little misinformation bots have not been given their marching orders from Moscow and the other right wing propaganda outlets
Nanker Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 So, reports of golden showers that were a part of the dossier from "Mr. Steele’s sources in Russia (who were not paid) reported on an extensive — and now confirmed — effort by the Kremlin to help elect Mr. Trump president. Yeah, that really raised his standing in the national polls. You dummy.
Koko78 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Nanker said: So, reports of golden showers that were a part of the dossier from "Mr. Steele’s sources in Russia (who were not paid) reported on an extensive — and now confirmed — effort by the Kremlin to help elect Mr. Trump president. Yeah, that really raised his standing in the national polls. You dummy. Well, you have to give them credit for trying to stand by the stuff they think they can use to make money. Though the false claim of "confirmation" is hilarious. Edit: As a side note, I would suspect that it is accurate that their "sources" are unpaid, as I'm sure those 'unnamed sources citing unnamed methods' are totally real and not figments of Steele's imagination (like all of the dossier). Edited January 3, 2018 by Koko78
row_33 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 30 minutes ago, Nanker said: So, reports of golden showers that were a part of the dossier from "Mr. Steele’s sources in Russia (who were not paid) reported on an extensive — and now confirmed — effort by the Kremlin to help elect Mr. Trump president. Yeah, that really raised his standing in the national polls. You dummy. the 4Chan hoax that insane Trump-haters bought hook, line, and sinker?
B-Man Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, row_33 said: the 4Chan hoax that insane Trump-haters bought hook, line, and sinker? Yep, the media doubles down on their stupidity/hypocrisy............and the lemmings eat it up. , Edited January 3, 2018 by B-Man
Tiberius Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 35 minutes ago, Nanker said: So, reports of golden showers that were a part of the dossier from "Mr. Steele’s sources in Russia (who were not paid) reported on an extensive — and now confirmed — effort by the Kremlin to help elect Mr. Trump president. Yeah, that really raised his standing in the national polls. You dummy. That's not been disproven. In fact the Trump people went so far as to admit that prostitutes were sent to his room. They only say he turned them down. But the the money laundering is the big thing here. Criminal enterprise, which means Trump was compromised and could very well have conspired with Russians as we already know they did. Thats ts why he obstructed justice to hide that. Obstruction has already been proved. Just filling in details of why. Why wont Republicans release the transcripts of the interviews?? 1
Tiberius Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Bannon said this??? Quote Steve Bannon has described as “treasonous” a 2016 meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, campaign chairman Paul Manafort and a Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, who said she had damaging information on Hillary Clinton, according to a new book by Michael Wolff seen by The Guardiannewspaper. In Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Wolff writes that Bannon told him: “The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor—with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers. Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad ****, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.” The June 2016 meeting came about after Trump Jr. was allegedly promised documents that would “incriminate” rival Hillary Clinton. Wolff writes that Bannon told him that if any such meeting had to take place, it should have been set up “in a Holiday Inn in Manchester, New Hampshire, with your lawyers who meet with these people.” Bannon told Wolff the investigation into alleged collusion with the Kremlin is likely focusing on alleged money-laundering and predicted: “They’re going to crack Don Jr. like an egg on national TV.” READ IT AT THE GUARDIAN 1
Koko78 Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Keep pushing the 'Red Menace' narrative like it's 1954...
Tiberius Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 7 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Keep pushing the 'Red Menace' narrative like it's 1954... Got treason? Brannon thinks so. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 The trolling going on is amazing to see. Now Bannon is going to be embraced by the very same people who called him Goebbels last night over dinner. 1
B-Man Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 39 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The trolling going on is amazing to see. Now Bannon is going to be embraced by the very same people who called him Goebbels last night over dinner. Lemmings gotta lemming.................. I suppose that it would be silly to point out that this selected excerpt came out right before a new book release ? 1
Tiberius Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Oh boy, you two clowns rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic!
Deranged Rhino Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Worth clicking on to read the full thread.
Recommended Posts