Buffalo_Gal Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) On 4/22/2020 at 2:23 PM, daz28 said: I've went through it some, but as with most things trying to fish through the nonsense can be frustrating. The right wants me to think that the Dems are all deep state, and the left wants me to think everything was kosher. Even if I did get to the bottom of it, I'd still just be a smarter insignificant daz. Deep state has morphed into a catch-all for the un-elected bureaucracy. The people involved in the sedition were appointments (although Obama knew about it if you read the Page/Strzok email exchange) as well as some people that were hired workers. Again, you are never going to believe anyone who has been following this if you do not read the source material yourself. I strongly urge you to do so. It is not fun reading, you will (probably) be red pilled, but it is worth the effort. Edited May 21, 2020 by Buffalo_Gal 4
Foxx Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: It’s not a left/right issue. Both sides were very much in on it. It’s a DC establishment issue. right. it just so happens that today's boogieman is the Left. at some point the shoe will transfer and the Right will be the boogieman. bread and circuses for the (m)asses. Edited April 22, 2020 by Foxx 4
Foxx Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 25 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: because many of the NPC lemmings crowd can't seem to read past the headline (that is often misleading, btw)... More Media Misdirection on Trump-Russia The headline is an attention-grabber, particularly the subhead. The New York Times breathlessly reports that a Republican-led Senate panel has issued a report that “undercuts claims by President Trump and his allies that Obama-era officials sought to undermine his candidacy by investigating Russia’s 2016 election meddling.” Naturally, you’re thinking: “That’s it. All Trump’s diatribes about a ‘hoax’ have been the usual claptrap. Even the GOP admits that the Obama administration had good reasons to investigate whether Trump’s campaign was colluding with Russia.” Except . . . that’s not what the Times story actually says. Carefully parsed, it’s not even what the headline says. In truth, the story is a nothing-burger. We learn that one of the most useless committees on Capitol Hill, the Senate Intelligence Committee, has issued a 158-page report — festooned with the usual “there are things we can’t tell you” redactions — as a capper to its three-year investigation into a question no one is asking: Did the intelligence community competently conclude that Russia interfered in the 2016 campaign? ... 1 3 3
snafu Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 11 hours ago, Tiberius said: Bi-Partisan Senate said investigation was right. BTW, Russia still trying to help Trump This is a problem! Is nobody calling out the Russians and Trump about this?!?! Thanks for letting us know. I hope you continue to spread the word, friend. 1
Tiberius Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 8 hours ago, snafu said: This is a problem! Is nobody calling out the Russians and Trump about this?!?! Thanks for letting us know. I hope you continue to spread the word, friend. You admit Russia is helping Trump? Good!
snafu Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You admit Russia is helping Trump? Good! No. There is no evidence that Russia IS helping Trump. Where do you get that information? The Senate report only addressed the 2016 election. And the Senate report, now that I think about it, doesn’t say anything about Trump colluding with Russia. Hmmmm, maybe you’re NOT so right about the things you allege? 1
Tiberius Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 10 minutes ago, snafu said: No. There is no evidence that Russia IS helping Trump. Where do you get that information? The Senate report only addressed the 2016 election. And the Senate report, now that I think about it, doesn’t say anything about Trump colluding with Russia. Hmmmm, maybe you’re NOT so right about the things you allege? Thanks! I thought for a minute you left the loony farm, but no, you are still there. Remember, Russia is helping Trump. 1
bdutton Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: You admit Russia is helping Trump? Good! Russia is helping whoever they think will continue to divide the american people and you and others on the left are just helping them. 2
Tiberius Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, bdutton said: Russia is helping whoever they think will continue to divide the american people and you and others on the left are just helping them. No, they like Trump. Do you agree Putin is a murderous scum?
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 HMMMMMMM... Gee, why would Durham’s team be expanding to include trafficking experts? https://mobile.twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1253336166717259782 (but nothing is happening) 3
Koko78 Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 17 hours ago, B-Man said: . That's nonsense. Clearly Putin favored Trump over the candidate whom he had been paying off for years. Hillary would have clearly stopped taking bribes through the Clinton Money Laundering Foundation if she had been elected. No doubt that Bill would have stopped accepting $500,000 speaking fees from Russia as well. 2
Nanker Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 17 hours ago, B-Man said: . 24 minutes ago, Koko78 said: That's nonsense. Clearly Putin favored Trump over the candidate whom he had been paying off for years. Hillary would have clearly stopped taking bribes through the Clinton Money Laundering Foundation if she had been elected. No doubt that Bill would have stopped accepting $500,000 speaking fees from Russia as well. Just more unverified nonsense. Everyone knows the veracity of those documents can't be proven until the Clinical Trials are completed. #DENY-DENY-DENY...SHENEVERWASSUPPOSEDTOLOSE! 1
Warren Zevon Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 NANK - THE - THANK! NANK - THE - THANK! NANK - THE - THANK!
Koko78 Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, Nanker said: Just more unverified nonsense. Everyone knows the veracity of those documents can't be proven until the Clinical Trials are completed. #DENY-DENY-DENY...SHENEVERWASSUPPOSEDTOLOSE! Short clinical trials, or the 30-year long-term studies? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 More: The leak came from CNN, not the Examiner. Scarpelli is the perfect guy to bring in to review pending indictments in an effort to make them airtight FYI. Violent crimes, Narcotics, and Trafficking experts now aboard. Two things immediately popped to mind: 1) Cassandra https://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/obama-hezbollah-drug-trafficking-investigation/ and 2) 3 2
Recommended Posts