DC Tom Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: Sure sounds like a police force to me What does the FBI do with persons it arrests in the course of an ... https://www.fbi.gov/.../what-does-the-fbi-do-with-persons-it-arrests-in-the-course-of-a... A person arrested by the FBI is taken into custody, photographed, and fingerprinted. In addition, an attempt often is made to obtain a voluntary statement from the arrestee. The arrestee remains in FBIcustody until the initial court appearance, which must take place without unnecessary delay. Mr. Tom's Lapdog strikes again Let's see what the FBI has to say. Hey FBI, are you a police force? No 1
3rdnlng Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 4 hours ago, Tiberius said: Have you looked at the facts? All the lies Trump told, the Russians offering info, Trump's team wanting them, the connection to Wikileaks, Trump's love of Putin, the changing of our foreign policy and so much more. Hard to see see how it can be dismissed when so many verifiable facts support the basic conclusion. I'm not so worried about the collusion as I am of the President being compromised. Do do you remember Elliott Spitzer resigning because he was with a whore? That was because it made him a potential target of black mail. Same thing here with Trump and Russia. If Putin has something hanging over Trump, that's real bad news for the US. Would you at least agree with that point? Please explain how Spitzer was vulnerable to blackmail after the news came out about him whoring around.
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 10 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Please explain how Spitzer was vulnerable to blackmail after the news came out about him whoring around. So all you can do is ask pointless questions on something you can easily look up yourself. You are not a worthless poster, but it is close Ya, period, so funny! Not
3rdnlng Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So all you can do is ask pointless questions on something you can easily look up yourself. You are not a worthless poster, but it is close Ya, period, so funny! Not So, you realize how silly your statement was and are now trying to chickenshit your way around it?
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: So, you realize how silly your statement was and are now trying to chickenshit your way around it? Wasn't silly at all. The fact you NEVER have a point at all is what's silly
3rdnlng Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Wasn't silly at all. The fact you NEVER have a point at all is what's silly My point, you idiot is that once the news was out regarding Spitzer and the whore then there wouldn't be anything to blackmail him with.
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: My point, you idiot is that once the news was out regarding Spitzer and the whore then there wouldn't be anything to blackmail him with. Wow, you actually made a point! A not very good one, but a point nonetheless. Yes, I'm sure a guy who was paying a pimp could continue being the chief law enforcement officer of the state 1
3rdnlng Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Wow, you actually made a point! A not very good one, but a point nonetheless. Yes, I'm sure a guy who was paying a pimp could continue being the chief law enforcement officer of the state Don't move the goalposts. This is what you wrote: "Do do you remember Elliott Spitzer resigning because he was with a whore? That was because it made him a potential target of black mail." I have completely refuted it, admit it.
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Don't move the goalposts. This is what you wrote: "Do do you remember Elliott Spitzer resigning because he was with a whore? That was because it made him a potential target of black mail." I have completely refuted it, admit it. No, he could have still been blackmailed. The pint could have either revealed more info that was not in the public, or like DC Tom, just pulled something out of his azz. Ahem
3rdnlng Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: No, he could have still been blackmailed. The pint could have either revealed more info that was not in the public, or like DC Tom, just pulled something out of his azz. Ahem So, you now claim that he could have been blackmailed for something else? You're terrible at this.
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 49 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: So, you now claim that he could have been blackmailed for something else? You're terrible at this. You are not making any sense at all. You are a troll, and that's all Point is. Trump might be compromised by Putin 1
3rdnlng Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 24 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are not making any sense at all. You are a troll, and that's all Point is. Trump might be compromised by Putin After a year of investigations that have produced nothing you still want Trump out because he might have been compromised by Putin?
DC Tom Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 33 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are not making any sense at all. You are a troll, and that's all Point is. Trump might be compromised by Putin After a year of screaming "is," now you're going with "might be?"
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: After a year of investigations that have produced nothing you still want Trump out because he might have been compromised by Putin? Produced nothing? See, you are being either willfully ignorant or just being a troll And how long should a complex investigation into international affairs, cyber crimes and the interference our elections take? 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: After a year of screaming "is," now you're going with "might be?" Yes Mr. Pettifogger, if I said "is" you'd scream like a monkey that it wasn't absolutely proven yet and traitors, well, Republican traitors anyway, are so innocent until and even after proven guilty
3rdnlng Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Produced nothing? See, you are being either willfully ignorant or just being a troll And how long should a complex investigation into international affairs, cyber crimes and the interference our elections take? Ha! The MSM and the left has been in collusion in the leaking of anything that would disparage Trump regardless of its veracity. The only things they can leak regarding the Russian investigation are falsehoods that have been proven to be fabrications.
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Ha! The MSM and the left has been in collusion in the leaking of anything that would disparage Trump regardless of its veracity. The only things they can leak regarding the Russian investigation are falsehoods that have been proven to be fabrications. What falsehoods have been proven fabrications? Flynn's guilty plea? The Trump Towers meetings? The obvious obstruction of justice? Don't ever say you love this country when you are covering for such a traitor
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 ______________ http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/21/politics/andrew-mccabe-congress-testimony/index.html Good luck Conservatives trying to convince Americans that its the FBI who is lying and not pathological liar Trump about the meetings between Trump and Comey Quote In private testimony before the House Intelligence Committee this week, McCabe told lawmakers that Comey informed him of conversations he had with President Donald Trump soon after they happened, according to three sources with knowledge of the matter. Congressional Russia investigators grill FBI deputy director The testimony suggests McCabe could corroborate Comey's account, including Trump's ask that Comey show him loyalty, which the President has strongly disputed. Comey previously testified that he briefed some of his senior colleagues at the FBI about this conversation with Trump.
B-Man Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 STONEWALL: Byron York: Frustrated lawmakers pressed FBI’s McCabe for answers on Trump dossier. They got nothing.. “At one point, McCabe was reminded that another top FBI official had months ago told the House that the bureau had not been able to corroborate the dossier. McCabe’s response was noncommittal.” .
Tiberius Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 25 minutes ago, B-Man said: STONEWALL: Byron York: Frustrated lawmakers pressed FBI’s McCabe for answers on Trump dossier. They got nothing.. “At one point, McCabe was reminded that another top FBI official had months ago told the House that the bureau had not been able to corroborate the dossier. McCabe’s response was noncommittal.” . He wouldn't spill the beans on an on going investigation. Nothing bad here These Republicans must feel Trump is guilty so they are nit picking over the investigation. Sad
Nanker Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 Quote In private testimony before the House Intelligence Committee this week, McCabe told lawmakers that Comey informed him of conversations he had with President Donald Trump soon after they happened, according to three sources with knowledge of the matter illegal leaks by Adam Schiff and two other Democrat shills who have groped through sewers to try to find anything to pin on Trump. Congressional Russia investigators grill FBI deputy director The testimony suggests McCabe could corroborate Comey's account, including Trump's ask that Comey show him loyalty, which the President has strongly disputed. Comey previously testified that he briefed gave nothing more than hearsay to some of his senior colleagues at the FBI about this (perhaps recorded) conversation with Trump. Comey is a rat and he could have said anything to his colleagues. It doesn't mean what he said is actually what went down.
Recommended Posts