OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 26, 2019 Posted October 26, 2019 On 10/26/2019 at 2:57 PM, Nanker said: Expand ...yes there are significant issues there...... 2
Nanker Posted October 26, 2019 Posted October 26, 2019 On 10/26/2019 at 3:06 PM, Gary Busey said: Good morning wanky Expand 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 27, 2019 Posted October 27, 2019 Oh boy... She was banging McCabe too. 1 3
keepthefaith Posted October 27, 2019 Posted October 27, 2019 On 10/27/2019 at 11:18 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Oh boy... She was banging McCabe too. Expand Really? That will be interesting if the story is affirmed. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted October 27, 2019 Posted October 27, 2019 On 10/27/2019 at 11:27 PM, keepthefaith said: Really? That will be interesting if the story is affirmed. Expand I've heard that rumored for awhile, but never anything to substantiate it (and still haven't). We'll see what OAN rolls out to back it up. 2
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 On 10/27/2019 at 11:18 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Oh boy... She was banging McCabe too. Expand At this point, I'm most inclined to believe she was a Russian agent than anyone else involved in this whole mess. (Yes, I would. Cute, slutty brunette with obvious low standards? Where've you been all my life, baby?) 1 2
B-Man Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 On 10/28/2019 at 1:19 AM, DC Tom said: At this point, I'm most inclined to believe she was a Russian agent than anyone else involved in this whole mess. (Yes, I would. Cute, slutty brunette with obvious low standards? Where've you been all my life, baby?) Expand 2
Hedge Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 On 10/27/2019 at 11:18 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Oh boy... She was banging McCabe too. Expand Original tweet was deleted after this: 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 (edited) On 10/29/2019 at 3:05 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Expand I am trying to figure out why the government hasn't dismissed the charges. Clearly someone is now feeding Sidney Powell's team information, although every time I see something released it is always the prosecution delaying or obfuscating. Who is in charge of this prosecution? Does Barr have no say in this? Or is this playing out this way for a reason? Prosecutorial misconduct? all the info coming out twice? I am trying to figure out an end-game for the US Government that covers them in glory, and there does not appear to be one. So, why is this continuing? And whose decision is it to continually withhold evidence from the Flynn trial? I understood the first several years of bad faith by the prosecution, but I do not understand "why" at this point. Edited October 29, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1 3
Nanker Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 On 10/29/2019 at 3:52 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: I am trying to figure out why the government hasn't dismissed the charges. Clearly someone is now feeding Sidney Powell's team information, although every time I see something released it is always the prosecution delaying or obfuscating. Who is in charge of this prosecution? Does Barr have no say in this? Or is this playing out this way for a reason? Prosecutorial misconduct? all the info coming out twice? I am trying to figure out an end-game for the US Government that covers them in glory, and there does not appear to be one. So, why is this continuing? And whose decision is it to continually withhold evidence from the Flynn trial? I understood the first several years of bad faith by the prosecution, but I do not understand "why" at this point. Expand Agreed. It's been the most painful slow-roll I think I've ever seen. There's a missing piece here. It doesn't add up well. Perhaps the Persecution's team is also under investigation. Maybe the judge is dragging his feet because he's seeing the misconduct - which he presided over (as judge) and needs to carefully couch the end result (throwing out the charges - most likely in my view) so he doesn't appear too hasty in accepting Flynn's guilty plea. (I know he "begged" him not to but at the time Flynn was being extorted to the fullest extent of the law.) Could he not have accepted Flynn's plea and sent the case directly to trial - and the government's mis-deed would have been uncovered months ago instead of coming out in the sentencing phase and only after Flynn fired his legal team and hired a lawyer with some grasp of the overall situation? 2
DC Tom Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 On 10/29/2019 at 3:52 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: I am trying to figure out why the government hasn't dismissed the charges. Clearly someone is now feeding Sidney Powell's team information, although every time I see something released it is always the prosecution delaying or obfuscating. Who is in charge of this prosecution? Does Barr have no say in this? Or is this playing out this way for a reason? Prosecutorial misconduct? all the info coming out twice? I am trying to figure out an end-game for the US Government that covers them in glory, and there does not appear to be one. So, why is this continuing? And whose decision is it to continually withhold evidence from the Flynn trial? I understood the first several years of bad faith by the prosecution, but I do not understand "why" at this point. Expand Probably hoping Trump gets impeached and they can quietly resolve this behind the resulting uproar. 3
keepthefaith Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 On 10/29/2019 at 3:52 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: I am trying to figure out why the government hasn't dismissed the charges. Clearly someone is now feeding Sidney Powell's team information, although every time I see something released it is always the prosecution delaying or obfuscating. Who is in charge of this prosecution? Does Barr have no say in this? Or is this playing out this way for a reason? Prosecutorial misconduct? all the info coming out twice? I am trying to figure out an end-game for the US Government that covers them in glory, and there does not appear to be one. So, why is this continuing? And whose decision is it to continually withhold evidence from the Flynn trial? I understood the first several years of bad faith by the prosecution, but I do not understand "why" at this point. Expand Maybe it's important for the DOJ to avoid any appearance of partisanship. If the charges against Flynn are to be dropped, they want to make absolutely sure they are on very solid ground. 1 2
Foxx Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 On 10/29/2019 at 3:52 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: I am trying to figure out why the government hasn't dismissed the charges. Clearly someone is now feeding Sidney Powell's team information, although every time I see something released it is always the prosecution delaying or obfuscating. Who is in charge of this prosecution? Does Barr have no say in this? Or is this playing out this way for a reason? Prosecutorial misconduct? all the info coming out twice? I am trying to figure out an end-game for the US Government that covers them in glory, and there does not appear to be one. So, why is this continuing? And whose decision is it to continually withhold evidence from the Flynn trial? I understood the first several years of bad faith by the prosecution, but I do not understand "why" at this point. Expand to the bolded, this has been my question for some time as well. who exactly is prosecuting this case? it would stand to reason that Barr would have oversight of it. it would also stand to reason if Barr is who he appears to be, he would want to see justice served. unless we are wrong here, some things just don't add up. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 Gar-Bear, spectacularly wrong again... as expected: 1 2
Foxx Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 https://twitter.com/RealSLokhova/status/1189335854902370304 3
Recommended Posts