Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/24/2019 at 6:42 PM, DC Tom said:

 

How do the Democrats even begin to compete with this sort of marketing?

#orangemanbad

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

It's "CLEAR" to Adam..........................:wallbash:

 

 

 

 

I said it 100 days ago before they took over the majority -- the House committee will be all about show and 2020, nothing of merit or substance. The Senate Judiciary is where the action will be.

 

Schiff will be lucky to escape what's coming without a perp walk.

(he's Gang of 8 and knows better than most just how false the information he's pushed/is pushing is. Criminally so)

Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

It's "CLEAR" to Adam..........................:wallbash:

 

 

 

Follow the money? That's what politicians in the swamp do, not what DOJ is supposed to do.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: :lol: 

 

What? 

 

 

How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? 

If the House dems can call John Dean to testify then most anything is possible.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: :lol: 

 

What? 

 

 

How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? 

If the defense gets to enter Inspector Clousseau highlights then it's all good.

Edited by 4merper4mer
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: :lol: 

 

What? 

 

 

How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? 

 

Full re.tard is an interesting prosecution strategy...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: :lol: 

 

What? 

 

 

How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? 

 

Probably an inaccurate tweet. 

 

(Shocker. )

Posted
5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: :lol: 

 

What? 

 

 

How can a clip from a movie be evidence? I can see it being used as a visual aid for a closing/opening statement (maybe) but evidence? 

Evidence there never should have been a Godfather III???

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

That's not how it works, you weaselly little *****.

 

Be careful what you wish for, Strzok, as you will surely get it.

 

 

By the way...are we back to Russia or we still planning to impeach Trump because he sent out a white supremacist dog whistle to a far-left Bernie fan to make him murder a bunch of people in Dayton?

Posted
6 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Be careful what you wish for, Strzok, as you will surely get it.

 

 

By the way...are we back to Russia or we still planning to impeach Trump because he sent out a white supremacist dog whistle to a far-left Bernie fan to make him murder a bunch of people in Dayton?

 

Image result for why not both meme

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Bold move. 

 

 

Watching his perp walk will be one of the highlights. 

 

 

The irony is THICK.

 

Not irony, good legal strategy.

 

They're going to get a preview of the evidence regarding the case for any potential criminal charges through the civil discovery process.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Not irony, good legal strategy.

 

They're going to get a preview of the evidence regarding the case for any potential criminal charges through the civil discovery process.

 

Yes but that works both ways, right? 

×
×
  • Create New...