Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Abiding by the constitution would mean executing the traitors who committed treason and sedition. 

 

Just fyi. 

 

Can you quote this from the constitution? 

 

Need more fyi on your claim.

Posted
14 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

Can you quote this from the constitution? 

 

Need more fyi on your claim.

 

it allows for capital punishment

 

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

They already did, that's why Trump needs to cover everything up. Hiding the Mueller report because it shows what the hands off approach really is, lawless. Stopping witnesses from testifying because they can talk about obstruction and conspiracy (gloves off) 

 

This is all so wrong. President can't be indicted, so they turn to Congress and Trump is doing everything in his power to block the legitimate role of Congress to investigate. Lawlessness begets more lawlessness. 

 

How about you guys just put the gloves back on and abide by the Constitution 

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/mueller-report-volume-ii-available-top-congressional-democrats/

 

Quote

In order to provide lawmakers with greater transparency into special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, the Department of Justice placed a less-redacted version of his report in a secure room on Capitol Hill, and granted access to that room to congressional leaders of both parties, as well as the chairmen and ranking members of intelligence and judiciary committees in the House and Senate.

As of this writing, not one of the six Democrats granted access to what amounts to 99.9 percent of volume II of the Mueller report, which details the president’s behavior as it relates to obstruction of justice, have taken the opportunity to examine it. If they had, they could have viewed the entirety of Mueller’s obstruction case against Trump except for the following seven redactions, two of which are applied to footnotes.

 

The truth is that the Democrats have no interest in what is in the report.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, bdutton said:

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/mueller-report-volume-ii-available-top-congressional-democrats/

 

 

The truth is that the Democrats have no interest in what is in the report.

 

100%

 

They want to talk about anything BUT what's in the report, as evidenced by the past several weeks since the report has been out for all to read, including less redacted versions for Congress which, to date, no democrat has bothered to read. 

 

It was always a coup. Always. 

 

Still is.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's not the Constitution.  It also provides a specific definition of "treason" that excludes anything that's happened with respect to Trump's election.

 

And the Rosenberg's weren't convicted and executed for treason.  Only espionage, which is one of the reasons it was so controversial.

Posted
11 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

That's not the Constitution.  It also provides a specific definition of "treason" that excludes anything that's happened with respect to Trump's election.

 

And the Rosenberg's weren't convicted and executed for treason.  Only espionage, which is one of the reasons it was so controversial.

 

it was controversial because Dems don't want to punish anyone for criminal wrongdoing, unless it hits them personally

 

Posted
Just now, row_33 said:

 

it was controversial because Dems don't want to punish anyone for criminal wrongdoing, unless it hits them personally

 

 

It was controversial because many people thought - and still think - the death penalty was excessive for an espionage case.

Posted
2 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

it was controversial because Dems don't want to punish anyone for criminal wrongdoing, unless it hits them personally

 

 

J Edgar Hoover opposed the sentence

Posted
Just now, McGee Return TD said:

 

J Edgar Hoover opposed the sentence

 

I'm sure you think you contributed to the discussion.  But you didn't.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

J Edgar Hoover opposed the sentence

 

and you were there

 

Posted
Just now, DC Tom said:

 

I'm sure you think you contributed to the discussion.  But you didn't.

 

You're right - That idiot Canadian and your genius interpretations combined for a discussion of the year award. I was in the wrong to participate. 

Posted
1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

and you were there

 

 

30jmhq.jpg

Just now, McGee Return TD said:

 

 I was in the wrong to participate. 

 

You're right, you were.  Apology accepted.

Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Sure they do. That's why they are calling for its full release. If anyone things Barr didn't cover up some stuff in his redactions, I have a bridge to sell you. 

 

 

 

They've had the ability to read the report, in full -- outside of GJ information -- for two full weeks and not a single democrat has done so. They have not read the public report either. 

 

If they cared what's in the report, one would logically assume they'd read it. 

 

Oops.

Posted
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Sure they do. That's why they are calling for its full release. If anyone things Barr didn't cover up some stuff in his redactions, I have a bridge to sell you. 

 

 

lol... never go full ######.

 

tenor.gif?itemid=3990841

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They've had the ability to read the report, in full -- outside of GJ information -- for two full weeks and not a single democrat has done so. They have not read the public report either. 

 

If they cared what's in the report, one would logically assume they'd read it. 

 

Oops.

 

What are the rules for the members who can read the report?

 

I've seen it reported that only 12 or so members can see the report and they cannot discuss it with anyone, not even other members of Congress, outside of the room it's in.

Edited by McGee Return TD
Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They've had the ability to read the report, in full -- outside of GJ information -- for two full weeks and not a single democrat has done so. They have not read the public report either. 

 

If they cared what's in the report, one would logically assume they'd read it. 

 

Oops.

 

Who cares if they haven't read it.  That's not important.

 

What's important is: they've had the ability to read the report, in full, outside of grand jury information, and they're throwing a hissy fit over Barr misrepresenting the report and withholding it from them.  They held Barr in contempt for one of two things: withholding something he's not withholding, or withholding details that he's required by law to withhold.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

They've had the ability to read the report, in full -- outside of GJ information -- for two full weeks and not a single democrat has done so. They have not read the public report either. 

 

If they cared what's in the report, one would logically assume they'd read it. 

 

Oops.

It has to be made public to refute Trump's and the GOP lies that are being told about it. Right now its just he said, she said, and Barr is refusing to go on the record with the House because he knows he will have to lie about it. It's just that simple 

×
×
  • Create New...