TakeYouToTasker Posted April 11, 2019 Posted April 11, 2019 (edited) - Trump is a Russian agent - Trump not Russian asset, but colluded with Russia - Trump didn’t collude with Russia, but Russia acted on his behalf - There was no Russian collusion, but Trump obstructed justice - There was no obstruction of justice, but AG Barr is a Trump stooge - We did not spy on the Trump Campaign - The word "spying" is incendiary language <- YOU ARE HERE - Some people spied, but it was an accident - There was intentional spying, but it was predicated on a good, and properly run intelligence operation - There was spying, it wasn’t based on good intelligence, but it was done by a few rogue bad apples - We ordered and coordinated the spying, but there was no cover up - There was a cover up, but not to hide the fact that we tried to rig a federal election - We tried to rig a federal election, but not with the help of our international allies - We tried to rig a federal election with the help of our international allies, but did not attempt a coup in order to oust a duly elected President to cover our tracks - We attempted a coup edit: borrowed from somewhere I cannot remember, and improved upon. Edited April 11, 2019 by TakeYouToTasker 8 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 11, 2019 Posted April 11, 2019 * The one thing that is still not being discussed publicly in the mainstream: what triggered this. It wasn't just the fact Trump won, but it's tied directly to Adm Rogers' discovery of 702 abuse inside the DOJ and FBI by private contractors (Fusion GPS, Crowd Strike, and others). 1 3
/dev/null Posted April 12, 2019 Posted April 12, 2019 7 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: - Trump is a Russian agent - Trump not Russian asset, but colluded with Russia - Trump didn’t collude with Russia, but Russia acted on his behalf - There was no Russian collusion, but Trump obstructed justice - There was no obstruction of justice, but AG Barr is a Trump stooge - We did not spy on the Trump Campaign - The word "spying" is incendiary language <- YOU ARE HERE - Some people spied, but it was an accident - There was intentional spying, but it was predicated on a good, and properly run intelligence operation - There was spying, it wasn’t based on good intelligence, but it was done by a few rogue bad apples - We ordered and coordinated the spying, but there was no cover up - There was a cover up, but not to hide the fact that we tried to rig a federal election - We tried to rig a federal election, but not with the help of our international allies - We tried to rig a federal election with the help of our international allies, but did not attempt a coup in order to oust a duly elected President to cover our tracks - We attempted a coup edit: borrowed from somewhere I cannot remember, and improved upon. you glossed over a few steps of Shut Up You're a Racist Shut Up Shut Up You Racist Shut up You're only saying Obama spied because you're a racist Shut up Spying is the new racist dog whistle Shut Up 4
keepthefaith Posted April 12, 2019 Posted April 12, 2019 Just now, /dev/null said: Spying is the new racist dog whistle As ridiculous a position as that seems, the left will likely play that card just as you say. 2
/dev/null Posted April 13, 2019 Posted April 13, 2019 Twitter account citing "people in room told me" is not a reliable source. don't follow the same path the MSM took the last two years
Hedge Posted April 13, 2019 Posted April 13, 2019 2 hours ago, /dev/null said: Twitter account citing "people in room told me" is not a reliable source. don't follow the same path the MSM took the last two years It seems to me that most posters on this board are discerning enough to realize that grains (or boulders) of salt are needed for this type of information. I would rather have read the tweet in the post you are referring to, than not to have seen it at all, which I wouldn't have otherwise. Now the onus is on me to decide if I want to file it away as potentially interesting third hand information or if I feel compelled to do my own follow up (if possible) to see if it can be verified. 3
/dev/null Posted April 13, 2019 Posted April 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, Hedge said: It seems to me that most posters on this board are discerning enough to realize that grains (or boulders) of salt are needed for this type of information. I would rather have read the tweet in the post you are referring to, than not to have seen it at all, which I wouldn't have otherwise. Now the onus is on me to decide if I want to file it away as potentially interesting third hand information or if I feel compelled to do my own follow up (if possible) to see if it can be verified. I agree My concern is we just spent two years listening to the MSM cite unnamed sources to advance a Narrative leading to an outcome the political left desired (impeachment) ahead of any actual facts or evidence. With the conclusion of the Mueller report, people critical of the political left and their MSM enablers seem to have fallen into the same trap by citing unnamed sources and leaks from the report in regards to possible spying by the Obama administration My advice is to keep the powder dry until the report is released. Then if there is evidence of spying......Republicans Pounce!!! 4 1
reddogblitz Posted April 13, 2019 Posted April 13, 2019 On 4/10/2019 at 9:07 AM, Deranged Rhino said: If only there were several threads with hundreds of pages to them, detailing the how, why, and what he's talking about. i havs had a good time watching the yellow dog D's and pundits aghast that the smear job accusations have come out of left field with NO EVIDENCE. The nerve of that guy. wolf had guests on and asked them where these allegations came from and they had no clue. I wish he would have had Rhino on. I'm thinking he could have helped them out. 1
/dev/null Posted April 13, 2019 Posted April 13, 2019 32 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: i havs had a good time watching the yellow dog D's and pundits aghast that the smear job accusations have come out of left field with NO EVIDENCE. The nerve of that guy. wolf had guests on and asked them where these allegations came from and they had no clue. I wish he would have had Rhino on. I'm thinking he could have helped them out. Wolf would never let someone like DR on his show. Gregggggy's facts and logic would harsh The Narrative
Nanker Posted April 14, 2019 Posted April 14, 2019 That’s what’s so confounding about the lefties. They just have closed off any possibility that the allegations against The President are totally bogus. They’ve closed their minds to that and now they’re going to be drinking some bitter medicine. 1
Prickly Pete Posted April 14, 2019 Posted April 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Nanker said: That’s what’s so confounding about the lefties. They just have closed off any possibility that the allegations against The President are totally bogus. They’ve closed their minds to that and now they’re going to be drinking some bitter medicine. I am feeling the cognitive dissonance in my business partner. We have argued for years now, and he is lashing out a bit because he can't cope with accepting that all the nonsense he has been spouting is wrong, and virtually all my predictions are coming true. He won't admit the source of his irritability of course. 1 1
Albwan Posted April 14, 2019 Posted April 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Nanker said: That’s what’s so confounding about the lefties. They just have closed off any possibility that the allegations against The President are totally bogus. They’ve closed their minds to that and now they’re going to be drinking some bitter medicine. They know they are in charge and that Trump and his voters are powerless.
Doc Posted April 14, 2019 Posted April 14, 2019 I work with a GI doc who hates Trump. For the past 2 years he'd often make a disparaging comment about Trump and occasionally about colluding with Russia, but he didn't go much farther because he knows I'd say it was all bull####. So I came in to work on Monday after the Mueller report dropped and there was a cake sitting there that was made by one of the GI nurses who happens to be Russian and happened to be working in his room. So when I was in-between cases I went into his room and said to her "Hey Natalia, did you make that cake to celebrate the fact that there's no Russian collusion?" Everyone busted-out laughing, except for the doc, who gave a dry "ha ha." Then the next time I worked with him he said "well, collusion wasn't the problem, it was the obstruction." I rolled my eyes at him and said "no, collusion was the only issue and we'll see what constituted obstruction when no crime occurred and Mueller was able to investigate fully." 1 1
4merper4mer Posted April 14, 2019 Posted April 14, 2019 12 hours ago, Albwan said: They know they are in charge and that Trump and his voters are powerless. Exakatickly. And that's why I've been calling the date any true culprit will be held to account the 12 of never. There may be a scapegoat here and there but even that is questionable. And when they have proven out that they can get away with anything, it will be bad news for the next few generations.
Recommended Posts