Deranged Rhino Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 (over obstruction - not collusion/conspiracy... which makes it entirely irrelevant) 1 1
Chandemonium Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 Looks like the folks at The Onion have been reading @Deranged Rhino‘s threads about Mueller and the Deep State: https://politics.theonion.com/white-house-says-mueller-report-must-be-kept-private-be-1833813865 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Chandemonium said: Looks like the folks at The Onion have been reading @Deranged Rhino‘s threads about Mueller and the Deep State: https://politics.theonion.com/white-house-says-mueller-report-must-be-kept-private-be-1833813865 The last few years have been so *****-up it has been very difficult to recognize The Onion as parody. Edited April 4, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 2
KRC Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 4 minutes ago, Chandemonium said: Looks like the folks at The Onion have been reading @Deranged Rhino‘s threads about Mueller and the Deep State: https://politics.theonion.com/white-house-says-mueller-report-must-be-kept-private-be-1833813865 From the article: Quote would be reduced to “gibbering idiots,” foaming at the mouth Too late. 1 1
Tiberius Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: (thread) That's funny! Just show the American people the report and we won't have to rely on annonomous sourcing 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: (over obstruction - not collusion/conspiracy... which makes it entirely irrelevant) No, not at all. Obstruction of justice is a crime. And if the obstruction hurt the probe, or hindered it from finding the conspiracy, then it is especially important to know that.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: if the obstruction hurt the probe, or hindered it from finding the conspiracy, then it is especially important to know that. It didn't. We know from muellers own words.
outsidethebox Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: That's funny! Just show the American people the report and we won't have to rely on annonomous sourcing No, not at all. Obstruction of justice is a crime. And if the obstruction hurt the probe, or hindered it from finding the conspiracy, then it is especially important to know that. How can you obstruct something that never happened?
KRC Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 1 minute ago, westside said: How can you obstruct something that never happened? With tweets. Duh. 2
Tiberius Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 5 minutes ago, westside said: How can you obstruct something that never happened? Easily, by obstructing the investigation.
Foxx Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 for you, @Tiberius https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1113812239784402944 3
Tiberius Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, Foxx said: for you, @Tiberius https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1113812239784402944 Comey was fired before the special council was even appointed, so that point is just a game argument.
outsidethebox Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 12 hours ago, Tiberius said: Easily, by obstructing the investigation. Why would they obstruct a investigation when they knew they never colluded?
row_33 Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 (edited) 13 hours ago, westside said: How can you obstruct something that never happened? Martha Stewart found out and served time for it. there never was a crime but you didn’t meet patently outrageous demands during the investigation, so you are guilty (see, Kafkaesque) 16 minutes ago, westside said: Why would they obstruct a investigation when they knew they never colluded? Just fall off the turnip truck, Sport? Edited April 5, 2019 by row_33
/dev/null Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 46 minutes ago, row_33 said: Martha Stewart found out and served time for it. there never was a crime but you didn’t meet patently outrageous demands during the investigation, so you are guilty (see, Kafkaesque) 1
Tiberius Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 1 hour ago, westside said: Why would they obstruct a investigation when they knew they never colluded? Maybe they were conspiring with the Russians and trying to hide it. We we need to see the report.
outsidethebox Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 1 hour ago, row_33 said: Martha Stewart found out and served time for it. there never was a crime but you didn’t meet patently outrageous demands during the investigation, so you are guilty (see, Kafkaesque) Just fall off the turnip truck, Sport? I'm replying to tibs. So I have talk to him like you would a 2 year old. 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Maybe they were conspiring with the Russians and trying to hide it. We we need to see the report. Was Mueller conspiring with the Russians as well? After two years and thousands of information collected, he didn't find any collusion? He came out and said no collusion. Do you know something Mueller doesn't know?
Tiberius Posted April 5, 2019 Posted April 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, westside said: I'm replying to tibs. So I have talk to him like you would a 2 year old. Was Mueller conspiring with the Russians as well? After two years and thousands of information collected, he didn't find any collusion? He came out and said no collusion. Do you know something Mueller doesn't know? Let's see the report then. They are hiding something. Yes, I know the report isn't being released.
Recommended Posts