Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

And that is precisely why the FF's created the EC.

 

 

Oh, the irony!

To help Trump win? LOL, no, no. 

 

The will of the people will prevail next time. Trump's lies have spent themselves out. No "Best health care ever" 

 

No massive infrastructure projects, no locking Hillary up, no Mexico going to pay for wall, no Nothing! F U!!! 

Posted

Sad day for soooooo many.

The President of the United States is definitively found NOT to be a Russian puppet/traitor.

And people are upset and throwing tantrums because this is the case. 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
25 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

The 20th century ended with three consecutive elections with a winner receiving less than 50% of the popular vote

 

1992: Bill Clinton 43.0%

1996: Bill Clinton 49.2%

2000: George W Bush 47.9%

 

 

See those #s trending up as we become more polarized?  As a strong third candidate drops off?

 

 

Anyway... It's

 

Popular vs. EC. I wasn't talking less than 50%.  That's a whole other beast.

 

Has there been two winner take all elections in a row where the EC was on the other side of the popular vote?  That means won popular, lost EC?  EC decides.

 

Trump tapped out his EC strategy.  He needs to strengthen in IA, WI, MI, PA...

 

OR MAKE in roads with other heavy working class areas.

 

Just saying.  The nation has been getting more purple out in red territory than it has been getting pink in blue territory in the last 90 years.

2 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Sad day for soooooo many.

The President of the United States is definitively found NOT to be a Russian puppet/traitor.

And people are upset and throwing tantrums because this is the case. 

Who?  Has the report been released to you?

 

Did you read it?

 

Where can I find it in whole so I can read.

 

Link?

Posted
8 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

 

 

See those #s trending up as we become more polarized?  As a strong third candidate drops off?

 

 

Anyway... It's

 

Popular vs. EC. I wasn't talking less than 50%.  That's a whole other beast.

 

Has there been two winner take all elections in a row where the EC was on the other side of the popular vote?  That means won popular, lost EC?  EC decides.

 

Trump tapped out his EC strategy.  He needs to strengthen in IA, WI, MI, PA...

 

OR MAKE in roads with other heavy working class areas.

 

Just saying.  The nation has been getting more purple out in red territory than it has been getting pink in blue territory in the last 90 years.

Who?  Has the report been released to you?

 

Did you read it?

 

Where can I find it in whole so I can read.

 

Link?

Here ya go. Written in language only you can understand.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Thanks.  Is that the whole unedited report from the Justice Department?

 

You done reading it yet ? 

 

What did you find ?    Anything besides a big case of the derps on your part ?

Posted
32 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

That I am an All-star?

 

Johnny, tell me what I just won!

 

sweet ***** all

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

That I am an All-star?

 

Johnny, tell me what I just won!

 

Since I now have Smash Mouth stuck in my head thanks to you, the rest of you can suffer along with me...

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

To help Trump win? LOL, no, no. 

 

The will of the people will prevail next time. Trump's lies have spent themselves out. No "Best health care ever" 

 

No massive infrastructure projects, no locking Hillary up, no Mexico going to pay for wall, no Nothing! F U!!! 

Turn off CNN dude. Prior to the election Trump was interviewed and asked what he meant by ‘Mexico would pay for the wall’ and he said he DID NOT expect them to write us s check!!  Sheeesh wake up! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Sorry Jim Jones... My mommy said never drink anything strangers give you.

 

Especially from creepers who want to bang dead suicide victims.

 

stop-right-there-before-you-speak-just-k

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Turn off CNN dude. Prior to the election Trump was interviewed and asked what he meant by ‘Mexico would pay for the wall’ and he said he DID NOT expect them to write us s check!!  Sheeesh wake up! 

He said they may even write us a check! 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/10/trump-claims-he-never-said-mexico-would-cut-check-wall-lets-go-tape/?utm_term=.5598e1a65fe1

 

Watch it for yourself oh brainwashed one. They are not paying for it period dummy 

Edited by Tiberius
Posted
19 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

He said they may even write us a check! 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/10/trump-claims-he-never-said-mexico-would-cut-check-wall-lets-go-tape/?utm_term=.5598e1a65fe1

 

Watch it for yourself oh brainwashed one. They are not paying for it period dummy 

Does the word MAY not mean anything in liberal fantasy land? Watch his one on one interview with Sean Hannity. Geez dude turn off the nonsense! You lost an election. How about just trying to win the next one?

Posted
Just now, SoCal Deek said:

Does the word MAY not mean anything in liberal fantasy land? Watch his one on one interview with Sean Hannity. Geez dude turn off the nonsense! You lost an election. How about just trying to win the next one?

LOL, so how are they paying for it? Oh ya, that's right, WE are paying for it UNCONSTITUTIONALLY! 

 

How's Mexico paying for it again? Through hocus pokus? 

×
×
  • Create New...