ExiledInIllinois Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 24 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said: Not sure if this is exiled or tibs LoL... I don't wear a tie and work in a cube. But close. 1 2
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 hour ago, ExiledInIllinois said: LoL... I don't wear a tie and work in a cube. But close. Neither do I! And there is evidence of Russians conspiring with Trumps campaign. ---- Quote However, let’s say for the sake of argument that the report shows: 1.) Trump hired multiple campaign officials who had, collectively, more than 100 contacts with Russians and solicited a hostile foreign power’s help in winning the presidency; 2.) Trump lied repeatedly about his pursuit of a business deal with a hostile foreign power while running for president; and 3.) Trump took a slew of actions (from misleading the public to seeking leniency for Michael Flynn to intimidating witnesses in plain sight) that, if committed by anyone other than the president, would be grounds for indictment. Do the Republicans plan on running in 2020 under the banner: Leave the Russian patsy in power — or What’s a little obstruction between friends? https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/23/its-not-democrats-who-will-have-problem-addressing-impeachment/?utm_term=.9f084750a05f 1
Doc Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 I'll take "how the libs are going to lose the 2020 election" for $2B, Alex. 1
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 hour ago, ExiledInIllinois said: LoL... I don't wear a tie and work in a cube. But close. It's obviously not you because you're not a white collar kind of guy, you're blue collar 17 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Neither do I! And obviously not you, because your job is to wash the collared shirts 1
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 minute ago, /dev/null said: It's obviously not you because you're not a white collar kind of guy, you're blue collar And obviously not you, because your job is to wash the collared shirts Oh Tay! Mr. Pocket Protector. LoL...
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 13 minutes ago, Doc said: I'll take "how the libs are going to lose the 2020 election" for $2B, Alex. don't be so sure, 17 months is an eternity in politics.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said: Fox is just as bad as the rest. Always has been. Anyone needing proof just look at who they added to the board once they split from Disney: Fox news / Murdoch is part of the club. Same team, different jerseys. 1
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Doc said: I'll take "how the libs are going to lose the 2020 election" for $2B, Alex. I don't think Don is gaining voters... And he did win an upside down election in 2016... This ain't 2004 where Dubya righted the ship. Have there ever been two upside down elections in a row in American history? Edited March 24, 2019 by ExiledInIllinois
row_33 Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: don't be so sure, 17 months is an eternity in politics. You can’t run a 17 month campaign with the media demanding new exciting things five times a day
Doc Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: I don't think Don is gaining voters... And he did win an upside down election in 2016... This ain't 2004 where Dubya righted the ship. Have there ever been two upside down elections in a row in American history? Who is to say it will be upside down? Hillary was as well-known of a candidate as you'll ever see.
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 Just now, Doc said: Who is to say it will be upside down? Hillary was as well-known of a candidate as you'll ever see. Upside down = lose popular, win EC. Has there ever been two in a row?
keepthefaith Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Upside down = lose popular, win EC. It's not a popularity contest.
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Have there ever been two upside down elections in a row in American history? The 20th century ended with three consecutive elections with a winner receiving less than 50% of the popular vote 1992: Bill Clinton 43.0% 1996: Bill Clinton 49.2% 2000: George W Bush 47.9%
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 27 minutes ago, Doc said: I'll take "how the libs are going to lose the 2020 election" for $2B, Alex. To trump??? LOL!! The FBI won't be helping him this time, and America has seen what an incompetent slob and hateful POS he is. No way does he win in 2020. No one will believe his lies now. He's a spent force. Maybe if Dems push this slavery reparations crap, but I think they will come to their senses
Doc Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Upside down = lose popular, win EC. Has there ever been two in a row? I know what "upside down" means. I'm asking if you think it's a slam-dunk that the D challenger will win the PV? 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: To trump??? LOL!! The FBI won't be helping him this time, and America has seen what an incompetent slob and hateful POS he is. No way does he win in 2020. No one will believe his lies now. He's a spent force. Maybe if Dems push this slavery reparations crap, but I think they will come to their senses I'll take... Edited March 24, 2019 by Doc
Tiberius Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: It's not a popularity contest. Sure it is. Or at least it will be this time, the majority of voters will pick the next president. The midterm elections saw Dems with a ten percent victory margin! In a gerrymandered race they still won 40 seats! And maybe forty one after it was discovered they tried stealing one in NC! Dems have a huge voter advantage. That's why Trump needs the EC math, he can't win otherwise 1 minute ago, Doc said: I'll take... Drink your kool aid then!
keepthefaith Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Sure it is. Or at least it will be this time, the majority of voters will pick the next president. The midterm elections saw Dems with a ten percent victory margin! In a gerrymandered race they still won 40 seats! And maybe forty one after it was discovered they tried stealing one in NC! Dems have a huge voter advantage. That's why Trump needs the EC math, he can't win otherwise There is no otherwise. 2
Doc Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Dems have a huge voter advantage. That's why Trump needs the EC math, he can't win otherwise And that is precisely why the FF's created the EC. 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Drink your kool aid then! Oh, the irony! 3
/dev/null Posted March 24, 2019 Posted March 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Doc said: And that is precisely why the FF's created the EC. ^winning argument
Recommended Posts