reddogblitz Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 8 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said: The most corrupt POTUS in modern times would surely want that, right? Donald could not carry Nixon or LBJ's lunch box. 1 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 2 hours ago, LSHMEAB said: If all that comes to fruition, then so be it. I was speaking more of a Barr lead Special Counsel investigating the investigators who appear to have cleared Trump. THAT would not be a good luck. We'll see what happens over the next couple weeks, but I've been watching Dem overreach for two years. The chickens are now coming home to roost. If I were Trump/an R member of the oversight committee, I would be reluctant to "potentially" make the same political miscalculation. At the end of the day, Trump played the left and can ride that wave. We shall see. Hey, I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate your intellectual honesty when approaching this topic. You’ve made me hopeful that a portion of folks who consider themselves left leaning, and oppose the President can be reached on this issue. Sincerely. 2 2
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 22 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Donald could not carry Nixon or LBJ's lunch box. Maybe. But this is 2019. The machines hide things better. Years of practice.
LSHMEAB Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 (edited) 26 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Hey, I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate your intellectual honesty when approaching this topic. You’ve made me hopeful that a portion of folks who consider themselves left leaning, and oppose the President can be reached on this issue. Sincerely. It never made sense from a logical perspective. There were THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of reporters who would have loved to uncover some nefarious Trump plot to collude with the Russians. In this day and age, SOMEONE, SOMEWHERE, would have uncovered more than a stupid meeting with a Russian lawyer and a phone call about a damn porn star. Those suffering from TDS suspended all logical deduction in their desire to re-write history and retroactively change the outcome of a legitimate election. Did the Russians monkey around on Facebook to sew discord in our body politic? Probably. Were there a few less than pristine actors on the Trump team? Yes. Yet there has never been a shred of evidence that Trump or anyone in his inner circle actively participated in Russia related malfeasance. Trump is (justifiably) about to embark on a victory lap "the likes of which the world has never seen." And he will revel in the tears of those that participated in this witch hunt. And it was a witch hunt. I should add that I say all this as someone who is not a fan of Trump or many of his policies. I do say this as someone who's primary pursuit in life is the truth. Edited March 23, 2019 by LSHMEAB 3 2 3
reddogblitz Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Maybe. But this is 2019. The machines hide things better. Years of practice. Perhaps, but do you REALLY think Trump is smart enough to collude with the Russian government and be able to hide it so well that a 2 year multi million dollar investigation could not find it? Edited March 23, 2019 by reddogblitz 1
Doc Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 (edited) 40 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Perhaps, but do you REALLY think Trump is smart enough to collude with the Russian government and be able to hide it so well that a 2 year multi million dollar investigation could not find it? The greatest trick Donald Trump ever pulled was convincing the world that he never colluded with Russia. Edited March 23, 2019 by Doc 4
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 13 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Perhaps, but do you REALLY think Trump is smart enough to collude with the Russian government and be able to hide it so well that a 2 year multi million dollar investigation could not find it? Trump doesn't have to be smart. The Russian have to be. We know how smart they are. Look... They (people) are screaming for another Brexit re-vote. The Russians gotta be working OT.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 47 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Maybe. But this is 2019. The machines hide things better. Years of practice. 4 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Trump doesn't have to be smart. The Russian have to be. We know how smart they are. Look... They (people) are screaming for another Brexit re-vote. The Russians gotta be working OT. They had Trump under the microscope. Using the most invasive and powerful surveillance tools ever created in history. And they were weilded by duplicitous, treasonous coup plotters who figured they'd find something - anything - they could use to force him out. They assumed he was as dirty as they were. He'd have to be, he's a reality star and casino mogul. But they came up empty. Because he's cleaner than they are. Saying trump could hide it - or the Russians could - is fairytale nonsense and comments like this are why you're deservedly ignored by many. 5
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 29 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They had Trump under the microscope. Using the most invasive and powerful surveillance tools ever created in history. And they were weilded by duplicitous, treasonous coup plotters who figured they'd find something - anything - they could use to force him out. They assumed he was as dirty as they were. He'd have to be, he's a reality star and casino mogul. But they came up empty. Because he's cleaner than they are. Saying trump could hide it - or the Russians could - is fairytale nonsense and comments like this are why you're deservedly ignored by many. Translation by DRino: They never landed on the moon, but now I trust that they did. TrustTheProcess® Because it fits my narrative -Signed, Your Average Freelance Hollywood Screenwriter
Deranged Rhino Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 Just now, ExiledInIllinois said: Translation by DRino: They never landed on the moon, but now I trust that they did. TrustTheProcess® Because it fits my narrative -Signed, Your Average Freelance Hollywood Screenwriter Again, it takes a special kind of person to call me a conspiracy theorist less than 24 hours after the fiction you've been believing and screaming about for two years gets exposed as such. You're not a serious person. This is why you're mocked and ignored. 8 1
Teddy KGB Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Translation by DRino: They never landed on the moon, but now I trust that they did. TrustTheProcess® Because it fits my narrative -Signed, Your Average Freelance Hollywood Screenwriter Lmao @ the narrative part. You can’t really be this dumb can you ? 2
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Again, it takes a special kind of person to call me a conspiracy theorist less than 24 hours after the fiction you've been believing and screaming about for two years gets exposed as such. You're not a serious person. This is why you're mocked and ignored. You cut me to the quick. Ouch.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said: You cut me to the quick. Ouch. It's the truth. Though I'd understand why you struggle to see it as such. Understanding the difference between fact, fiction, and general reality has never been your strongest suit.
snafu Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 3 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Translation by DRino: They never landed on the moon, but now I trust that they did. TrustTheProcess® Because it fits my narrative -Signed, Your Average Freelance Hollywood Screenwriter What narrative do you have? What supports it? I’m willing to believe that Mueller’s report needs to come out before anyone starts crowing. I’m willing to predict that the report is not going to be a glowing exoneration of Trump. Mueller will probably cast some shade on Trump world and walk that line between calling him a Boy Scout and calling him a criminal. But obviously (like Chris Matthews asked) if Trump DID something, then why didn’t Mueller go after anyone for collusion/conspiracy? Nobody in these 22 months were accused of consorting with Russians to affect the 2016 election. On the other hand, more has come from the past 22 months which would implicate members of the previous administration and bad actors in the FBI for trying to railroad the collusion narrative. 1
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's the truth. Though I'd understand why you struggle to see it as such. Understanding the difference between fact, fiction, and general reality has never been your strongest suit. A conspiracy theorist telling another the "truth." I am a bit skeptical. Sorry... You can't blame me.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 23, 2019 Posted March 23, 2019 Just now, ExiledInIllinois said: A conspiracy theorist telling another the "truth." I am a bit skeptical. Sorry... You can't blame me. 1 1
Recommended Posts