Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Top Mueller Prosecutor Stepping Down In Latest Clue Russia Inquiry May Be Ending
 

</snip>
 

The departure is the strongest sign yet that Mueller and his team have all but concluded their work.
 

</snip>

 

He's gonna go teach in NY (shocker). He's not going back to the DOJ --- his choice? Or "asked" to not return? Apparently, while he was at the DOJ during the 2016 election he was part of the chain of custody of the Steele dossier.

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Top Mueller Prosecutor Stepping Down In Latest Clue Russia Inquiry May Be Ending
 

</snip>
 

The departure is the strongest sign yet that Mueller and his team have all but concluded their work.
 

</snip>

 

He's gonna go teach in NY (shocker). He's not going back to the DOJ --- his choice? Or "asked" to not return? Apparently, while he was at the DOJ during the 2016 election he was part of the chain of custody of the Steele dossier.

 

This is the surest sign yet that Mueller is done. No more indictments coming, certainly not Trump's kids. If they had any high profile indictments left, Weissman would be running point. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Oh quick! Put the House of Representatives on the list of Deep State actors! :lol:

 

 

 

Quote

 

The House voted overwhelmingly and in bipartisan fashion to urge the Justice Department to publicly release the entirety of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report into Russian interference in the 2016 election, once completed.

The move is an attempt to “send a clear signal both to the American people and the Department of Justice” that lawmakers expect to see the full account of Mueller’s work, according to the House Judiciary Committee’s chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.).

The final vote count was 420 in favor, with no one voting no. Four lawmakers voted “present.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-overwhelmingly-bipartisan-vote-house-calls-for-mueller-report-to-be-made-public/2019/03/14/bed337fe-4660-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html?utm_term=.d819ee09782f

Posted
12 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

Neither. 

Is that because you don't think there's data or there have been no legal actions taken on the data?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, GG said:

Is that because you don't think there's data or there have been no legal actions taken on the data?

Because he's told what to say. He's a sock monkey. Nothing more.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Foxx said:

 

And you wonder how it's possible to take this stuff seriously:

 

Quote

 

Zainab Ahmad, a member of Mueller’s legal team, is the former Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York. As pointed out by Blackburn, Ahmad attended a Global Center on Cooperative Security event in 2017. In recent days, Blackburn wrote via Twitter: “Zainab Ahmad is a major player in the Russiagate scandal at the DOJ. Does she work for SC Mueller? She was at a GCCS event in May 2017. Arvinder Sambei, a co-director of the [London Centre of International Law Practice], worked with Joseph Mifsud, [George Papadopoulos] and [Simona Mangiante]. She’s a GCCS consultant.”

 

Blackburn told this author: “Zainab Ahmad was one of the first DOJ prosecutors to have seen the Steele dossier. In May 2017, she attended a counter-terrorism conference in New York with the Global Center on Cooperative Security (GCCS), an organization which Joseph Mifsud, the alleged Russian spy, had been working within London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.”

 

 

Random tenuous link = DEEP STATE! QED! Seriously, QED QED QED!

Posted

Tying Mifsud to western intelligence is not a tenuous link. It's a fact - as much of one as you can find in the gray world of spooks. There's much more to tie him to western intelligence (especially British intelligence) than there ever has been to tie him to Russian IC. Yet that narrative went unquestioned for years... wonder why?

 

But again, to understand why that matters, and how Mifsud fits in, requires someone to honestly read and assess the 100s of pages of evidence and documentation to support this which have been provided in this thread and others. 

 

Some refuse to do so. 

 

Because they're either here for reasons other than they admit, they're asshats, or they're suffering from crippling cognitive dissonance. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...