Kemp Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: No. They're pro western IC with long histories of working with the west and lobbyists, including the Podesta Group, Manafort's firm, and Mercury. They were also instrumental in the overthrow of Putin loyalists in the Ukraine. Manafort also gave the info to Kilimnik according to Manafort's attorney and wouldn't sharing that info with any foreigners be suspicious? What would be a non-nefarious reason for giving out the info?
3rdnlng Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, Kemp said: Sorry you couldn't understand what was obvious to some, but I do appreciate your personal compliment. Obvious to who? Name names.
Kemp Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 On 1/6/2019 at 8:12 PM, 3rdnlng said: I don't need to try to figure out what you mean, you dumbass. If you want discussion then you should make it easy to have a discussion with you. By the way, you still didn't address the point about anonymous sources being good or bad, no matter which side of the debate it falls on. Give it a shot. 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: Obvious to who? Name names. Now that your confusion has cleared why not answer? Bet you can't.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 Just now, Kemp said: Manafort also gave the info to Kilimnik according to Manafort's attorney and wouldn't sharing that info with any foreigners be suspicious? What would be a non-nefarious reason for giving out the info? There's a reason the NYT lead with fake news two days ago then had to retract. To confuse you on just this issue. Passing it to Kilimnik is not suspicious considering their relationship. To find out why, look into what Manafort and the Podestas were doing for the Ukraine at the time. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 59 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& The House committees will have lots of hearings... the real power is in the Senate. And Graham said yesterday top of his agenda is FISA abuse. I still have my fingers crossed that his spinal fusion holds. 1 2
Kemp Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 35 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: There's a reason the NYT lead with fake news two days ago then had to retract. To confuse you on just this issue. Passing it to Kilimnik is not suspicious considering their relationship. To find out why, look into what Manafort and the Podestas were doing for the Ukraine at the time. Passing along American voter rolls to foreigners is not suspicious? What about their relationship justifies it?
Deranged Rhino Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 13 minutes ago, Kemp said: Passing along American voter rolls to foreigners is not suspicious? What about their relationship justifies it? It is suspicious. But not for the reasons you're implying. Manafort was a plant. Once you get that sorted, the rest makes sense.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 From the Dailey beast Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, will testify publicly in front of the House Oversight Committee on Feb. 7, according to CNN. “I thank Michael Cohen for agreeing to testify before the Oversight Committee voluntarily,” said Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-MD). “I want to make clear that we have no interest in inappropriately interfering with any ongoing criminal investigations, and to that end, we are in the process of consulting with Special Counsel Mueller’s office.” Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison late last year for lying to Congress, orchestrating hush payments to two women, and other crimes. He’s been cooperating with Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Cohen told CNN that he agreed to testify before Congress “in furtherance of my commitment to cooperate and provide the American people with answers.” “I look forward to having the privilege of being afforded a platform with which to give a full and credible account of the events which have transpired,” he said. 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: It is suspicious. But not for the reasons you're implying. Manafort was a plant. Once you get that sorted, the rest makes sense. Putin's plant.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 28 minutes ago, Tiberius said: .Putin's plant. Incorrect.
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Holy *****... this was a real tweet. ? The Democrats are in more trouble than I supposed if Elijah Cummings is one of their "super powers". (That tweet has to be paid for, no one is that insane and stupid to believe something like that!) 1
BeginnersMind Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 PT Barnum could not get a better circus than Cohen testifying before Congress.
DC Tom Posted January 11, 2019 Posted January 11, 2019 3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Holy *****... this was a real tweet. ? The Democrats are in more trouble than I supposed if Elijah Cummings is one of their "super powers". (That tweet has to be paid for, no one is that insane and stupid to believe something like that!) He is pretty sharp on the oversight committee, actually.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 11, 2019 Posted January 11, 2019 Whaaaa? Who could'a seen this twist coming?! Much more to come. (swampiest committee on the Hill) 1
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2019 Posted January 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Whaaaa? Who could'a seen this twist coming?! Much more to come. (swampiest committee on the Hill) Well, that explains the timing of the Manafort 'oopsie', and the subsequent media misrepresentation/lies about the internal polling data. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted January 11, 2019 Posted January 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: Well, that explains the timing of the Manafort 'oopsie', and the subsequent media misrepresentation/lies about the internal polling data. Sure does.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 11, 2019 Posted January 11, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: One more fun factoid... Dec '16 is when the missing Strzok Page texts began. Reconcile. 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 11, 2019 Posted January 11, 2019 @Deranged Rhino How did the structure of this post even happen ? Do you have a time machine?
Deranged Rhino Posted January 11, 2019 Posted January 11, 2019 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: @Deranged Rhino How did the structure of this post even happen ? Do you have a time machine? I don't know to be honest. I thought it would quote the other post I quoted but it did not.
Recommended Posts