Deranged Rhino Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 http://thefederalist.com/2019/01/02/new-documents-suggest-steele-dossier-deliberate-setup-trump/#.XC129g_6XQd.twitter 1
outsidethebox Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 48 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: http://thefederalist.com/2019/01/02/new-documents-suggest-steele-dossier-deliberate-setup-trump/#.XC129g_6XQd.twitter And nothing will done with this. The deep state wins again.
Deranged Rhino Posted January 4, 2019 Posted January 4, 2019 This from the same guy who for two years has said he's seen evidence of collusion/conspiracy and called Trump a traitor... Schiff was, and remains, full of Schiff.
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 On 12/22/2018 at 11:12 PM, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/shannonbream/status/1076596315415629825?s=12 https://mobile.twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1076594202170085376?s=21 Follow-up: Supreme Court could act on mystery Mueller grand jury caseForeign-owned company could have to pay fines The Supreme Court could now decide as early as Wednesday afternoon whether an unnamed foreign-owned company will have to pay daily fines for avoiding a grand jury subpoena related to Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation. 1
njbuff Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 What's the cost of this Russian waste of time up to now....................... $175 trillion????
Nanker Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 It doesn’t matter. Plan A. Slime Trump in the campaign so he loses. Plan B. Resist and pursue Russia collusion so his administration is hamstrung and can’t drive their agenda. Plan C. Retake the House. Plan D. Eliminate POTUS and VP. Speaker Pelosi becomes POTUS 46. She he was never supposed to lose. She was NEVER supposed to lose. SHE WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO LOSE! 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: "but our sources say"... who is the source? Clyde the janitor? There was a time when I felt all journalist sources needed to be protected so they would not be afraid to inform investigative reports about the truth of a dangerous situation. Of course, there was also a time when I thought most reporters were journalists. These days, I am not so certain most of the press doesn't make up lies and just print "sources say". If this a lawsuit against McClatchy by Mitchell? 2
Taro T Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: "but our sources say"... who is the source? Clyde the janitor? There was a time when I felt all journalist sources needed to be protected so they would not be afraid to inform investigative reports about the truth of a dangerous situation. Of course, there was also a time when I thought most reporters were journalists. These days, I am not so certain most of the press doesn't make up lies and just print "sources say". If this a lawsuit against McClatchy by Mitchell? You have it backwards. Journalists, for the most part, used to be reporters. Now, reporters seem to be very few and far between. We need some good old fashioned reporters again who simply REPORT the facts as completely as they can and leave it to the reader (or listener or viewer) to interpret those facts. We don't need them to select how to best support the narrative of their journal. Missing the days when "yellow journalism" was a bad thing.
DC Tom Posted January 5, 2019 Posted January 5, 2019 31 minutes ago, Taro T said: You have it backwards. Journalists, for the most part, used to be reporters. Now, reporters seem to be very few and far between. We need some good old fashioned reporters again who simply REPORT the facts as completely as they can and leave it to the reader (or listener or viewer) to interpret those facts. We don't need them to select how to best support the narrative of their journal. Missing the days when "yellow journalism" was a bad thing. Not as much as you'd think, though. Edward R. Murrow showed bias in his reporting (albeit against Hitler and McCarthy, so no one cared, and he did allow McCarthy a half-hour rebuttal on his show), and ultimately lost his job complaining that his producers didn't allow him to show enough bias. And Cronkite's Vietnam reporting was decidedly, intentionally, purposefully slanted. It's always been present...it's just usually not nearly as bad as it is now. Even Civil War reporting was less angry and biased than news is today.
Koko78 Posted January 6, 2019 Posted January 6, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: It's always been present...it's just usually not nearly as bad as it is now. Even Civil War reporting was less angry and biased than news is today. That's just because Johnny Reb wasn't orange.
/dev/null Posted January 6, 2019 Posted January 6, 2019 8 minutes ago, Koko78 said: That's just because Johnny Reb wasn't orange. Robert E Lee may have been a slaveholder, but a Southern gentleman would never take a second scoop
keepthefaith Posted January 6, 2019 Posted January 6, 2019 6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: The responses from Gordon show how committed they are to their leftist partners. Thanks for posting, revealing.
Kemp Posted January 6, 2019 Posted January 6, 2019 17 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: "but our sources say"... who is the source? Clyde the janitor? There was a time when I felt all journalist sources needed to be protected so they would not be afraid to inform investigative reports about the truth of a dangerous situation. Of course, there was also a time when I thought most reporters were journalists. These days, I am not so certain most of the press doesn't make up lies and just print "sources say". If this a lawsuit against McClatchy by Mitchell? The article posted near the top of this page defending Flynn is also anonymously sourced.
3rdnlng Posted January 6, 2019 Posted January 6, 2019 46 minutes ago, Kemp said: The article posted near the top of this page defending Flynn is also anonymously sourced. What a crockofshit answer. There are more than one articles related to Flynn near the top of the page. Why are you afraid to be specific?
Taro T Posted January 7, 2019 Posted January 7, 2019 On Saturday, January 05, 2019 at 5:11 PM, DC Tom said: Not as much as you'd think, though. Edward R. Murrow showed bias in his reporting (albeit against Hitler and McCarthy, so no one cared, and he did allow McCarthy a half-hour rebuttal on his show), and ultimately lost his job complaining that his producers didn't allow him to show enough bias. And Cronkite's Vietnam reporting was decidedly, intentionally, purposefully slanted. It's always been present...it's just usually not nearly as bad as it is now. Even Civil War reporting was less angry and biased than news is today. The bolded being the key.
Kemp Posted January 7, 2019 Posted January 7, 2019 11 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: What a crockofshit answer. There are more than one articles related to Flynn near the top of the page. Why are you afraid to be specific? The one that Rhino posted Maybe now you can figure it out, considering that his post actually stated that it came from unnamed sources.
3rdnlng Posted January 7, 2019 Posted January 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, Kemp said: The one that Rhino posted Maybe now you can figure it out, considering that his post actually stated that it came from unnamed sources. I don't need to try to figure out what you mean, you dumbass. If you want discussion then you should make it easy to have a discussion with you.
DC Tom Posted January 7, 2019 Posted January 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I don't need to try to figure out what you mean, you dumbass. If you want discussion then you should make it easy to have a discussion with you. "I'm not going to have a discussion with you if you make it difficult!"
Recommended Posts