Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

Obviously the Russians have a sweet spot in the hearts for right wing western politicians they can get their filthy rat claws into

 

 
Rex_Questions_to_the_Government_at_P_10030266F.jpg
 
Marine Le Pen's loan offers a rare look inside the Russian influence engine, demonstrating how people, companies and networks outside the Kremlin pursue President Vladimir Putin’s foreign policy aims, often without a centralized plan.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This spin on the Steele Dossier is hilariously shallow (of course the source is too):

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/john_sipher/status/1078635078408912896

 

The dossier was used, along with circular intelligence, to get FISA warrants on multiple American citizens. If it's not accurate, then the entire basis for those warrants is fraudulent and should scare every American regardless of their chosen political party. 

 

Why?

 

Because it proves the DOJ and USIC conspired to violate the constitutional rights of Americans in order to interfer with a legal election. The USIC and DOJ playing favorites is the opposite of what our system of justice is supposed to represent. 

 

And now, after two years of "the dossier is real and verified!" those complicit in the crimes are trying to reframe that context to: "it was just a sketch of the situation, it doesn't matter if it's real or not because Orange Man bad!"  

 

Sane people on both sides of the aisle should be able to recognize this for what it is... How many will though?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

And now, after two years of "the dossier is real and verified!" those complicit in the crimes are trying to reframe that context to: "it was just a sketch of the situation, it doesn't matter if it's real or not because Orange Man bad!"

As I've said before... This entire Collusion investigation is based on a false premise. THAT should negate ANY possible crime found as a result.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

This is a big piece of news (from yesterday): 

 

FIG was an op. And there's evidence. Ask what that means.


What does that mean? ?

But seriously, this is truly sad how the intelligence community can go about sculpting a narrative (or crime!), feed it to the MSM (who goes wild with it), or, conversely, how high crimes can be ignored based on "who" is in office at the time. 

And the "elites" wonder why the natives are getting restless. Shesh.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


What does that mean? ?

But seriously, this is truly sad how the intelligence community can go about sculpting a narrative (or crime!), feed it to the MSM (who goes wild with it), or, conversely, how high crimes can be ignored based on "who" is in office at the time. 

And the "elites" wonder why the natives are getting restless. Shesh.

 

It means a couple different things actually. 

 

1) It is further proof of what was floated here months ago, namely that Flynn was actively working with the DIA when he went to Russia and when he formed FIG (the Flynn Intelligence Group). The two "partners" who were indicted in December were, more than likely, indicted due to the work Flynn was doing on the DIA's behalf before any of the Russian collusion stuff began. There's documentation to prove this, documentation which should have been provided to the judge prior to sentencing - but was withheld. 

 

*Related

 

2) Solomon's still got the best sources, likely from both POTUS and a few others highly connected people to both Congress and the DOJ. 

 

Flynn was sent in as bait - willingly - to run some sort of intelligence operation against foreign lobbyists, Russian and Turkish. He was propped up on RT (with the knowledge and consent of the DIA), wrote an op ed, and "began a lobbying group" ... that didn't do any lobbying. 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Sometimes public silence can be deafening or, for that matter, misleading.

 

For nearly two years now, the intelligence community has kept secret evidence in the Russia collusion case that directly undercuts the portrayal of retired Army general and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn as a Russian stooge.

 

That silence was maintained even when former acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn was possibly “compromised” by Moscow.

And when a Democratic senator, Al Franken of Minnesota, suggested the former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) chief posed a “danger to this republic.”

 

And even when some media outlets opined about whether Flynn’s contacts with Russia were treasonous. 

 

Yes, the Pentagon did give a classified briefing to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) in May 2017, but then it declined the senator’s impassioned plea three months later to make some of that briefing information public.

 

“It appears the public release of this information would not pose any ongoing risk to national security. Moreover, the declassification would be in the public interest, and is in the interest of fairness to Lt. Gen. Flynn,” Grassley wrote in August 2017.

 

Were the information Grassley requested made public, America would have learned this, according to my sources:

 

  • Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA.
  • He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
  • The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA. 
  • When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources.

DIA spokesman James Kudla on Wednesday declined comment about Flynn.

 

Rather than a diplomatic embarrassment bordering on treason, Flynn’s conduct at the RT event provided some modest benefit to the U.S. intelligence community, something that many former military and intelligence officers continue to offer their country after retirement when they keep security clearances.

 

More at the link:

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol:

 

 

Oh, that's just fabulous.

 

But untrue.  In fact, Don Jr. transported the cell tower in question to the roof of Cohen's building, where the phone pinged it.  WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

Ironic how some people believe Trump is the most disorganized and unintelligent President in the history of planet Earth also believe Trump is brilliant enough to plot something like this

 

A/k/a The Dubya Paradox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...