Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:


Boy, is that worth the read. "Odd" is such a simple word. I think he was looking for malfeasance (although he claims the trap wasn't illegal, just the rest of it). His point about the reveal for a process crime really does make you wonder WTH Mueller is thinking.
 

</snip>
 

Having authored hundreds of 302s, and run many sensitive counterintelligence investigations and operations during my bureau career, I know an FBI oddity when one wanders by.
 

</snip>


But “legal” doesn’t mean it was proper. McCabe dispatched Peter Strzok and another agent to do the interview. Pause a moment: Comey, McCabe, Strzok. All three subsequently were fired for cause.
 

</snip>
 

And so Flynn, who now faces criminal sentencing for lying to FBI agents, was contacted by McCabe, who not only lied to FBI agents but did so, unlike Flynn, while under oath. McCabe remains uncharged. Words such as “odd” and “ironic” fail.
 

</snip>
 

Oddity No. 3: The interview results reflected on the 302 seem untethered from the Russia collusion counterintelligence investigation. The only way FBI agents can legitimately interview Flynn is through an authorized FBI investigation — in this case, the Russia collusion counterintelligence case examining “links” between the Russian government and the Trump campaign to interfere with the 2016 presidential campaign.  
 

But Flynn is never asked about those things. Instead, the FBI interviewers appear fixated on understanding what the Trump administration might do to counter Obama administration policies, specifically sanctions imposed on Russia by President Obama after his party lost the election and an anti-Israel United Nations resolution that the Trump administration opposed. These are policy differences between duly elected presidential administrations, not of criminal or even counterintelligence interest.

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
 
Quote

 

December 26, 2018 9:40 am

A secret legal dispute over a grand jury subpoena believed to be linked to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has made its way to the Supreme Court, with Chief Justice John Roberts on Sunday night putting on pause a contempt order in the case.

Little is known about the sealed case, beyond that a mystery foreign company has resisted the subpoena and has lost its efforts to quash it at the federal court and appellate court level.

There has been no official confirmation that the subpoena came from Mueller’s probe. However, Politico reported earlier this year signs the case was Mueller related, and there have been other sightings at the federal courthouse in D.C. suggesting Mueller’s team was involved. A sealed hearing in the case in front of an appellate court panel earlier this month prompted an extraordinary amount of secrecy, with reporters being cleared from the entire courthouse floor where the judges were hearing the arguments.

Roberts on Sunday temporarily halted a contempt order the company is facing for resisting the subpoena, including the fines the company is accruing for defying the subpoena. Roberts’ order is public, but it provided no new details about the case. His move came after the company on Saturday requested the stay, in a filing that is noted in the court’s docket but is not available to be read publicly.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Nanker said:

And here's the direct link to the story embedded in DR's linky thingy above:

 

https://amgreatness.com/2018/12/23/the-neverending-mysterious-saga-of-michael-flynn/#.XCOu9B7sL1k.twitter

 

 

I'd like to punch the Special Investigator in the teeth.

Why? He is a great American. Putting corrupt filth in jail.

He's doing the job you guys hoped the House Republicans tried doing with Hillary, but they couldn't find a crime.

×
×
  • Create New...