boyst Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: Ahhhh, your favorite boogeyman is here! Show me on the doll where the bad man touched you. But no, I went over the rankings on Politfact, the non-profit non-partisan fact checkers. They rate news channels, don't you know? It turns out, they actually rank what the pundits say on the major news channels: ABC, CNN, NBC, CBS and Fox https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/ CNN is no prize, but Fox is easily the least truthful. Politfact. Yep. Wikipedia says they're legit and Snopes shows they're Accurate We need someone with enough free time and is lonely enough to respond who has a borderline drinking problem and no women in his life to set you straight. That narrows it down: @Teddy KGB, @TakeYouToTasker or @Deranged Rhino. 1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Politfact is absolutely not what you describe them as. It has been documented as projecting a fairly severe left-wing bias, while promoting itself as non-partisan. IE. It's a political spin machine used to deceive. You're a shill. ??????????????????? Thanks for proving my above post. Loser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 12 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: If I wanted accurate, factual reporting, why on Earth would I go to Fox News? The BBC and NPR are considerably less biased, and have a far better track record with fact based reporting. If you've been paying attention, this is the entire point that people were making from the hearing. The media ran with the first part of the session where Sullivan berated Flynn, and only a handful corrected the narrative after Sullivan apologized for his misrepresentation. Because again, you're being selective in what you want to read. The NPR account is fairly even-handed, and if you are going to quote it, then quote the entire relevant section. Quote At another point, the judge asked prosecutor Brandon Van Grack whether Flynn's conduct might have amounted to "treason" and also suggested that Flynn may have been acting as a foreign agent during his 24 days in the Trump White House. Van Grack responded that Flynn's undeclared lobbying work for Turkey ended before his stint in the White House and that "the government has no reason to believe that the defendant has committed treason." The judge later said he was merely asking the questions, not drawing any conclusions 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 (edited) 29 minutes ago, WhitewalkerInPhilly said: If I wanted accurate, factual reporting, why on Earth would I go to Fox News? The BBC and NPR are considerably less biased, and have a far better track record with fact based reporting. Ah, I see. I haven't read what Fox has reported on either. I just figured since you were crowing about busting a nut that someone else might question the veracity of news/partial news reports, surely you could not be so vapid and intellectually unaware as to have your own version of fake news and not know it. I get it now. There is only one source of inaccurate reporting in wwpland. I read/listen to NPR, I like to get a flavor for what others might be thinking or reporting on a variety of subjects. I don't spend much time with the BBC, I feel that since the government, through its agents and intelligence community tried to influence our Presidential election, they are not to be trusted. Edited December 19, 2018 by leh-nerd skin-erd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Go back a few pages to when this was live, and people were responding at it was happening from various sources (via Twitter) that were in the courtroom. I'd also strongly suggest people read the court transcript when released. Methinks people will see Judge Sullivan is most unhappy with all parties involved. The "treason" remark was, IMO, directed at the SCO. It was retracted after he met with the attorneys for the SC at the break (Judge Sullivan did not meet with Flynn attorneys at that break). There is definitely something fishy here. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 24 minutes ago, westside said: Of course he didn't. He says what his puppet masters tell him to say. He's nothing more than a brain less puppet, just like the rest of the leftwing nutbags. He's limited, unfortunately. If he goes swimming in a wading pool, his assumption thereafter is that all bodies of water are knee deep. That doesn't make him a bad person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 11 minutes ago, GG said: If you've been paying attention, this is the entire point that people were making from the hearing. Didn't some predict that the narrative would become the judge's initial rant, and ignore his retraction? 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 10 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: You're beyond wrong on this and even typing this out isn't worth my time so I'll stop right he Can you show proof he was working for the white house when this happened please? You, matter of fact, cannot. He wasn't. The only thing you. Have learned is when they rectally inserted talking points in to you #NPC. Go play in traffic. Humanity needs this from you. 8 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Politfact is absolutely not what you describe them as. It has been documented as projecting a fairly severe left-wing bias, while promoting itself as non-partisan. IE. It's a political spin machine used to deceive. You're a shill. HAHAHA....you know what yesterday was? .....It was that episode of South Park when the internet went down and Randy couldn't porn out.....Well yesterday was the day the internet got turned back on for you guys and you could finish off those boners you have had for 6 weeks...gonna be great...the judge would throw out the case....admonish the FBI and prosecution and show the Mueller was as corrupt as you want to believe....and then this board would have been like the famous last scene....this was your "Brazilian Fart Porn" ....get the Kleenex!! Instead the the Judge calls out the whole thing....beats down the defense for floating the BS idea that Flynn was cornered and tells the traitor to go sing some more!!! TOTAL FAIL FOR YOU STOOGES......TOTAL FAIL HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Didn't some predict that the narrative would become the judge's initial rant, and ignore his retraction? Only because it was so utterly predictable. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 16 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Politfact is absolutely not what you describe them as. It has been documented as projecting a fairly severe left-wing bias, while promoting itself as non-partisan. IE. It's a political spin machine used to deceive. You're a shill. I think the name got him. Politfact sounds factual. In fact, Politfact has reportedly investigated Politfact and certified they are non-partisan. Honestly what a dimwit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 16 minutes ago, TH3 said: Instead the the Judge calls out the whole thing....beats down the defense for floating the BS idea that Flynn was cornered and tells the traitor to go sing some more!!! That's not what happened. That's not even close to what happened. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, DC Tom said: That's not what happened. That's not even close to what happened. You guys do a tremendous job of talking yourselves into your preconceived beliefs.....step out of this phone booth...stop looking at those tweets from nobodies ....that is exactly what happened 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 48 minutes ago, bdutton said: You do realize that the Judge reversed his statement after the recess and basically apologized for his mistake. Yes, sort of. The judge also made Flynn admit all the right wing conspiracy "he was trapped by FBI talk" was crapola, too. 1 minute ago, TH3 said: You guys do a tremendous job of talking yourselves into your preconceived beliefs.....step out of this phone booth...stop looking at those tweets from nobodies ....that is exactly what happened DCTom will say anything, even if its totally and blatantly and provably wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, TH3 said: You guys do a tremendous job of talking yourselves into your preconceived beliefs.....step out of this phone booth...stop looking at those tweets from nobodies ....that is exactly what happened Seriously? You're ignoring most of what was recorded to happen, and ascribing prosecutorial actions and partisanship to the judge...and we're reinforcing our preconceptions? Are you just functionally retarded, or literally mentally disabled? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 OUR RULING CLASS LIVES IN A COMFORTING FANTASY WORLD: . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, TH3 said: You guys do a tremendous job of talking yourselves into your preconceived beliefs.....step out of this phone booth...stop looking at those tweets from nobodies ....that is exactly what happened No, no it's not at all. For anyone to believe this to be the case, they would first have to take small soundbites from the overall hearing completely out of context; and would be required to believe that the role of federal judges is one of primary investigation, and to conspire with the prosecution against the defense. Both of which are absurdities. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, TakeYouToTasker said: No, no it's not at all. For anyone to believe this to be the case, they would first have to take small soundbites from the overall hearing completely out of context; and would be required to believe that the role of federal judges is one of primary investigation, and to conspire with the prosecution against the defense. Both of which are absurdities. But it's baskin, so...absurdities, yet completely expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, TH3 said: stop looking at those tweets from nobodies Stop with this garbage! Paul Sperry, Tracy Beanz, & Techo Fog are the 3 best journalists out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 "You betrayed that flag" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 35 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Seriously? You're ignoring most of what was recorded to happen, and ascribing prosecutorial actions and partisanship to the judge...and we're reinforcing our preconceptions? Are you just functionally retarded, or literally mentally disabled? Why can't they be both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 FBI memos suggest Rosenstein expedited normal review process to fire McCabe before retirement Newly released internal FBI documents suggest Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein may have accelerated the review of ex-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's alleged misconduct to ensure he was terminated prior to his retirement, just days before he would have been eligible for a lifetime pension. </snip> 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts